"Doctor, how long will it take?" Results from an historical cohort on surgical pressure ulcer healing delay and related factors in persons with spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Flap surgery for deep pelvic pressure ulcers has already shown its effectiveness. Most studies relating to the postoperative period assessed complications rates and associated risk factors, but none focused on delayed wound healing. The objective of this study was to describe wound healing delay after primary flap surgery in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to assess associated risk factors. METHODS: This observational retrospective study based on medical charts included all persons with SCI operated for primary flap surgery for pelvic PU in the Hérault department of France between 2006 and 2014. Overall, 100 biomedical, psychological, socioeconomics and care management factors were studied. The primary outcome was wound healing delay, defined as time from surgery to complete cutaneous closure. RESULTS: 85 patients were included. Median healing time was 48 days (R: 20-406). Healing rate was 70% at 3 months and 90% at 4 months. After a multivariate analysis three factors were significantly associated with delayed wound healing: duration of hospitalization in the acute care unit (HR = 2.68; p = 0.004), local post-operative complication (HR = 10.75; p = 0.02), and post-operative sepsis (HR = 2.18; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: After primary skin flap surgery for PU in persons with SCI, delayed wound healing is related to local or general complications as well as care management organization. The risk of delayed wound healing justifies the implementation of a coordinated pre-operative management to prevent complications and a structured care network for an earlier transfer to a SCI rehabilitation center.

Rotator cuff surgery in persons with spinal cord injury: relevance of a multidisciplinary approach.

BACKGROUND: This article is a prospective review of patients with spinal cord injury who underwent multidisciplinary consultation from January 2005 to September 2013 for pain in one or both shoulders. METHODS: We performed clinical, functional, and lesion evaluations of 38 patients with paraplegia and quadriplegia presenting with rotator cuff pathologies. RESULTS: Surgery was indicated and performed on 38 shoulders in 28 patients. The lesion assessment during surgery showed injuries that were more severe than one would have thought based on imaging data. The mean pain intensity rating in the operative and nonoperative groups was 0 and 1.6, respectively, at rest and 2 and 4.9, respectively, during paroxysmal peaks. On average, for patients who had surgery, the Functional Independence Measure score decreased by 2.3. The mean satisfaction index in operated patients was 8.5 of 10. CONCLUSIONS: When the surgical indication was based on a multidisciplinary decision, no negative results were reported that could have challenged the validity of this decision. Pain relief was the primary benefit reported after surgery. The functional status was modified because of the technical aids needed to prevent shoulder overuse. There are several arguments in favor of rotator cuff surgery for wheelchair-bound patients with spinal cord injury. Because of their functional impairments, wheelchair-bound patients will continue to overburden their shoulders after rotator cuff surgery. A multidisciplinary approach emerges as the solution to inform and educate patients to limit the risk of recurrence.

Long-term mechanical ventilation equipment for neuromuscular patients: meeting the expectations of patients and prescribers.

BACKGROUND: To maximize the likelihood of successful long-term mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with neuromuscular diseases, ventilator characteristics and settings must be chosen carefully, taking into account both medical requisites and the patient's preference and comfort. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patients' knowledge about and comfort with their long-term MV; to compare patients' and prescribers' opinions and expectations regarding long-term MV; and to compare the equipment used by the patients to the prescribers' current MV prescription. METHODS: Neuromuscular patients receiving long-term MV, and home MV prescribers in Belgium and France were asked to respond to a questionnaire survey specifically developed for the study. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were collected from 209 patients (mean age 35.4 ± 15.9 y, range 3-86 y), ventilated since 11 ± 17 year, and 45 MV prescribers. One hundred sixty-three (78%) patients correctly designated their MV mode as a volume or pressure controlled mode. When an inspiratory trigger was available, 92% of the patients were able to use it, but only 69% were satisfied. Prescribers were more prone than patients to use new technologies such as an emergency-release system for the noninvasive interface (1-10 visual analog scale score 9.2 ± 1.5 vs 6.8 ± 3.3, P < .001), a humidification system (8.6 ± 1.4 vs 7.8 ± 2.6, P = .02), a contactor for providing larger inspiratory volumes (8.4 ± 1.7 vs 6.0 ± 3.0, P = .009), a built-in cough assistance mode (9.2 ± 1.4 vs 5.5 ± 3.5, P < .001), new options to improve speech, or new MV modes such as a volume-targeted pressure control. CONCLUSIONS: The opinions of patients and prescribers differed about the ideal home ventilator. Patients were less prone to use new technologies, mainly because of a lack of information, underlining the need for regular MV update in patients receiving long-term MV.