Recanalization Therapies for Large Vessel Occlusion Due to Cervical Artery Dissection: A Cohort Study of the EVA-TRISP Collaboration / 대한뇌졸중학회지

Background@#and Purpose This study aimed to investigate the effect of endovascular treatment (EVT, with or without intravenous thrombolysis [IVT]) versus IVT alone on outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) attributable to cervical artery dissection (CeAD). @*Methods@#This multinational cohort study was conducted based on prospectively collected data from the EVA-TRISP (EndoVAscular treatment and ThRombolysis for Ischemic Stroke Patients) collaboration. Consecutive patients (2015–2019) with AIS-LVO attributable to CeAD treated with EVT and/or IVT were included. Primary outcome measures were (1) favorable 3-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) and (2) complete recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale 2b/3). Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (OR [95% CI]) from logistic regression models were calculated (unadjusted, adjusted). Secondary analyses were performed in the patients with LVO in the anterior circulation (LVOant) including propensity score matching. @*Results@#Among 290 patients, 222 (76.6%) had EVT and 68 (23.4%) IVT alone. EVT-treated patients had more severe strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, median [interquartile range]: 14 [10–19] vs. 4 [2–7], P<0.001). The frequency of favorable 3-month outcome did not differ significantly between both groups (EVT: 64.0% vs. IVT: 86.8%; ORadjusted 0.56 [0.24–1.32]). EVT was associated with higher rates of recanalization (80.5% vs. 40.7%; ORadjusted 8.85 [4.28–18.29]) compared to IVT. All secondary analyses showed higher recanalization rates in the EVT-group, which however never translated into better functional outcome rates compared to the IVT-group. @*Conclusion@#We observed no signal of superiority of EVT over IVT regarding functional outcome in CeAD-patients with AIS and LVO despite higher rates of complete recanalization with EVT. Whether pathophysiological CeAD-characteristics or their younger age might explain this observation deserves further research.

Clinical Outcome of Neurological patients with COVID-19: the impact of Healthcare organization improvement between waves.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the differences of clinical presentations and the impact of healthcare organization on outcomes of neurological COVID-19 patients admitted during the first and second pandemic waves. MethodsIn this single center cohort study, we included all patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to a Neuro-COVID Unit. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were compared between patients admitted during the first and second waves of COVID-19 pandemic. Results223 patients were included, of whom 112 and 111 hospitalized during the first and second pandemic waves, respectively. Patients admitted during the second wave were younger and exhibited pulmonary COVID-19 severity, resulting in less oxygen support (n=41, 36.9% vs n=79, 70.5%, p<0.001) and lower mortality rates (14.4% vs 31.3%, p=0.004). The different healthcare strategies and early steroid treatment emerged as significant predictors of mortality independently from age, premorbid conditions and COVID-19 severity in cox regression analyses. ConclusionsDifferences in healthcare strategies during the second phase of COVID-19 pandemic probably explain the differences in clinical outcomes independently of disease severity, underlying the importance of standardized early management of neurological patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on AMI and Stroke mortality in Lombardy: Evidence from the epicenter of the pandemic

BackgroundThe Covid-19 pandemic has enormously impacted the delivery of clinical healthcare and hospital management practices in most of the hospitals around the world for both Covid and no-Covid patients. In this context, it is extremely important to assess whether the clinical management of no-Covid cases has not seriously been compromised during the first epidemic outbreak. Among no-Covid cases, patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke need non-deferrable emergency care and are the natural candidates as no-Covid patients to be studied. Preliminary evidence suggests that i) the time from onset of symptoms to emergency department (ED) presentation has increased in Covid-19 times as well 30-day mortality during the pandemic has been higher. We aimed to complement this evidence assessing if the additional stress due to the high inflow of Covid-19 patients at hospital level has modified AMI and Stroke admission criteria and related mortality rates in a causal inference framework. MethodsTo study the impact of Covid pandemic on mortality rates for AMI and Stroke we adopt two quasi-experimental approaches, regression-discontinuity design (RDD) and difference-in-regression-discontinuity (DRD) designs by which we identify the plausible causal effect on mortality of the Covid-19-related hospital stress due to the introduction of State of Emergency restrictions. FindingsWe check the causal effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on mortality rates of AMI and stroke over several time-windows of 15-days around the implementation date of the State of Emergency restrictions for COVID-19 (March, 9th). Despite the potential adverse effect on expected mortality due to a longer time to hospitalization, the AMI and Stroke mortality rates are overall not statistically different from the one observed in the control group. The obtained results provided by RDD and DRD models are robust also when we account for seasonality and unobserved factors. InterpretationIn a quasi-experimental setting we assessed the causal impact of the hospital and staff extra-burden generated by the first wave of Covid-19 patients on mortality rates of no-Covid non-deferrable urgent cases (AMI and Stroke) hospitalized at Spedali Civili of Brescia, one of the most hit provinces in Italy by Covid-19 during March and May 2020. We find a non-statistically significant impact on mortality rates for AMI and Stroke patients providing evidence of the hospital ability to manage - with the implementation of a double track organization-the simultaneously delivery of high quality cares to both Covid and no-Covid patients. Availability of similar data for the regional context as a whole is needed to further substantiate the findings and explore existing differences in efficacy of different managerial settings implemented in Lombardy hospitals. FundingAll authors - except for Stefano Verzillo-acknowledge financial support from the Region of Lombardy, project 2014IT16RFOP012 Misura a sostegno dello sviluppo di collaborazioni per lidentificazione di terapie e sistemi di diagnostica, protezione e analisi per contrastare lemergenza Coronavirus e altre emergenze virali del futuro. Stefano Verzillo has participated as external econometrician from European Commission, Joint Research Center to this project without receiving any funding or financial support, in compliance with EC rules. His contribution has been offered in the Conceptualization and Writing and Editing stages. Role of the Funding sourceThe founder had no roles in our study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish and preparation of the manuscript.

COVID-19 impact on consecutive neurological patients admitted to the emergency department

ObjectiveAim of this study was to analyse the impact of COVID-19 on clinical and laboratory findings and outcome of neurological patients consecutively admitted to the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary hub center. MethodsAll adult patients consecutively admitted to the ED for neurological manifestations from February 20th through April 30th 2020 at Spedali Civili of Brescia entered the study. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were extracted from medical records and compared between patients with and without COVID-19. ResultsOut of 505 consecutively patients evaluated at ED with neurological symptoms, 147 (29.1%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. These patients displayed at triage higher values of CRP, AST, ALT, and fibrinogen but not lymphopenia (p<0.05). They were older (73.1 {+/-} 12.4 vs 65.1 {+/-} 18.9 years, p=0.001) had higher frequency of stroke (34.7% vs 29.3%), encephalitis/meningitis (9.5% vs 1.9%) and delirium (16.3% vs 5.0%). Compared to patients without COVID, they were more frequently hospitalized (91.2% vs 69.3%, p<0.0001) and showed higher mortality rates (29.7% vs 1.8%, p<0.0.001) and discharge disability, independently from age. ConclusionsCOVID-19 impacts on clinical presentation of neurological disorders, with higher frequency of stroke, encephalitis and delirium, and was strongly associated with increased hospitalisation, mortality and disability.

Clinical features and outcomes of inpatients with neurological disease and COVID-19

ObjectiveTo report the clinical and laboratory characteristics, as well as treatment and clinical outcomes of patients admitted for neurological diseases with COVID-19 in a Neuro-COVID unit compared to patients without COVID-19. MethodsIn this retrospective, single centre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients with confirmed COVID-19, who had been discharged or died by April 5, 2020. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data were extracted from medical records. Results173 patients were included in this study, of whom 56 resulted positive for COVID-19 and 117 resulted negative for COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 were older, had a different distribution regarding admission diagnoses, including cerebrovascular disorders, and had a higher quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score on admission (all p<0.05). In-hospital mortality rates and incident delirium were significantly higher in the COVID-19 group (all p<0.05). COVID-19 and non-COVID patients with stroke had similar baseline characteristics but patients with COVID-19 had higher modified Rankin scale scores at discharge (p<0.0001), with a significantly lower number of patients with a good outcome (p<0.0001). Multivariable regressions showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with higher qSOFA scores (odds ratio 4.47, 95% CI 1.21-16.5; p=0.025), lower platelet count (0.98, 0.97-0.99; p=0.005) and higher lactate dehydrogenase (1.01, 1.00-1.03; p=0.009) on admission. ConclusionsCOVID-19 patients admitted with neurological disease, including stroke, have a significantly higher in-hospital mortality, incident delirium and higher disability than patients without COVID-19.