High efficacy of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and impact of baseline resistance-associated substitutions in hepatitis C genotype 3 infection.

BACKGROUND: Twelve weeks of the pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral (DAA) combination sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) was highly efficient in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 (GT3) infection in the ASTRAL-3 approval study. However, presence of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) in the HCV nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) was associated with lower treatment response. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of SOF/VEL ± ribavirin (RBV) and the impact of NS5A RASs and RBV use on treatment outcome in HCV GT3 infection in a real-world setting. METHODS: In this multicentre cohort study, GT3 patients from ten treatment centres across Germany were included. Sustained virological response was assessed 12 weeks after end-of-treatment (SVR12) in modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol analysis (PP). NS5A RASs were tested by population-based sequencing. RESULTS: A total of 293 GT3 patients were included. The median age was 48 years, 70% were male, 25.3% were cirrhotic, 9.2% were HCV/HIV co-infected and 21.8% were treatment-experienced, including 4.1% with DAA experience. Baseline NS5A RASs (Y93H, A30K, L31M) were detected in 11.2%. RBV was added in 5% of noncirrhotic and 58.9% of cirrhotic patients, respectively. SVR12 rates for SOF/VEL±RBV were 95.9% (mITT) and 99.5% (PP), respectively. Only 1 virological relapse occurred in a cirrhotic patient previously treated with SOF/RBV. No treatment-related major adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Twelve weeks of SOL/VEL±RBV was safe and highly efficient in HCV GT3 across a diverse patient population. Baseline NS5A RASs were rarely observed and presence did not seem to impact SVR, regardless of the use of RBV.

Rates of sustained virological response 12 weeks after the scheduled end of direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-based hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy from the National German HCV registry: does HIV coinfection impair the response to DAA combination therapy?

OBJECTIVES: The European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) treatment recommendations for hepatitis C no longer discriminate between HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected and HCV-monoinfected patients. However, recent data from Spain are questioning these recommendations on the basis of the findings of higher relapse rates and lower cure rates in HIV/HCV-infected subjects. The aim of our study was to compare HCV cure rates in monoinfected and coinfected patients from Germany. METHODS: Data acquired from the Deutsches Hepatitis C-Registry were analysed. A total of 5657 HCV-monoinfected subjects and 488 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were included in the study. Rates of sustained virological response 12 weeks after the scheduled end of therapy (SVR12) were collected in both subgroups and in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. RESULTS: HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were more frequently male (84.6% vs. 56.4%, respectively; P < 0.001) and younger than HCV-monoinfected subjects (46.5 ± 9 vs. 53.8 ± 12.5 years, respectively; P < 0.001). The CD4 blood cell count was > 350 cells/µL in 63.1% of HIV-positive subjects and 88.7% were on antiretroviral therapy. SVR12 rates were 90.3% (5111 of 5657) in our HCV-monoinfected cohort and 91.2% (445 of 488) in our coinfected patients. Liver cirrhosis was confirmed in 1667 of 5657 (29.5%) monoinfected patients and 84 of 488 (17.2%; P < 0.001) coinfected patients. SVR12 rates did not differ between HCV-monoinfected and HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with liver cirrhosis (87.8% vs. 89.3%, respectively; P = 0.864). A treatment duration of 8 weeks did not reduce the percentage of patients with SVR12 in either subgroup (93.7% in both groups). CONCLUSIONS: We found high SVR12 rates in monoinfected as well as coinfected individuals. No differences were detected between the two subgroups regardless of whether there was accompanying liver cirrhosis or a shortened treatment duration.

Real-world experience with the all-oral, interferon-free regimen of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the German Hepatitis C Registry.

Real-world studies are relevant to complement clinical trials on novel antiviral therapies against chronic hepatitis C; however, clinical practice data are currently limited. This study investigated effectiveness and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir (OBV/PTV/r)±dasabuvir (DSV)±ribavirin (RBV) for treatment of HCV genotype (GT) 1 and GT4 infection in a large real-world cohort. The German Hepatitis C Registry is an observational cohort study prospectively collecting clinical practice data on direct-acting antiviral therapies. Patients with GT1/4 infection treated with OBV/PTV/r±DSV±RBV were analysed. Effectiveness was assessed by sustained virologic response in 558 patients who reached post-treatment week 12 (SVR12). Safety is reported in 1017 patients who initiated treatment. Of the patients, 892 (88%) had GT1 and 125 (12%) had GT4 infection. Prior treatment experience and cirrhosis were reported in 598 (59%) and 228 (22%) patients, respectively. Overall, SVR12 (mITT) was 96% (486/505) in GT1- and 100% (53/53) in GT4 patients. SVR12 rates were high across subgroups including patients with cirrhosis (95%, 123/129), patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (100%, 34/34), and subgroups excluded from registrational trials like patients ≥70 years (96%, 64/67) and failures to prior protease inhibitor treatment (96%, 46/48). Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were reported in 52% (525/1017) and 2% (21/1017) of patients, respectively, and led to treatment discontinuation in 1.5% (15/1017) of patients. OBV/PTV/r±DSV±RBV was effective and generally well tolerated for treatment of HCV infection in clinical practice.

Real-world use, effectiveness and safety of anti-viral treatment in chronic hepatitis C genotype 3 infection.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 3 (GT3) is more challenging compared with other genotypes. Since 2014, several new treatment regimens have been approved but sometimes based on limited data. AIM: To validate the use, effectiveness and safety of anti-viral treatment in chronic hepatitis C genotype 3 infection under real-word conditions. METHODS: The German Hepatitis C-Registry is a large national non-interventional real-world study for patients with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 1322 GT3 patients were enrolled (211 untreated and 1111 treated patients). RESULTS: Between February 2014 and September 2015, five different treatment strategies have been used (PegIFN+RBV, PegIFN+RBV+SOF, SOF+RBV, DCV+SOF±RBV, LDV/SOF±RBV). Treatment uptake and use of treatment concepts changed markedly and rapidly during the study influenced by new approvals, guideline recommendations, and label updates. PegIFN-based therapies constantly declined while DCV-based therapies increased with one interruption after the approval of LDV/SOF, which was frequently used until new guidelines recommended not using this combination for GT3. Per-protocol SVR ranged from 80.9% in the PegIFN+RBV group to 96.1% in PegIFN+RBV+SOF treated patients. Treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis showed a suboptimal SVR of 68% for SOF+RBV but a high SVR of 90-95% for DCV+SOF±RBV. The safety analysis showed more adverse events and a stronger decline of haemoglobin for RBV containing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data can validate the effectiveness and safety for treatment regimens that had previously been approved with limited data, in particular for specific subgroups of patients. The present study demonstrates how rapid new scientific data, new treatment guidelines, new drug approvals and label changes are implemented into routine clinical practice today.

Chronic hepatitis C patients prior to broad access to interferon-free treatments in Germany.

In 2014, the first interferon-free treatment options for chronic Hepatitis C (CHC) became available in Europe introducing a new era of highly effective and well tolerated oral treatment options for CHC. The data from the cross-sectional study CURRENT-C highlights the epidemiological characteristics of patients with CHC in Germany. During the period that the study was conducted, the approval of the combination drugs for the treatment of CHC was imminent.Between June and November 2014, 1471 CHC-patients not receiving anti-HCV treatment were included nationwide in 40 German centers specializing in viral hepatitis. The mean age was 52.4 years with 41.2 % of the patients being female. Presumed route of infection in male patients was most frequently drug use (46.2 %) and blood products in females (22.8 %). The route of infection was unknown in 28.2 % of male and 43.1 % of female patients. Compared to male patients, female patients were older (55.6 vs. 50.1 years) and longer diagnosed with HCV (18 vs. 15 years). First language of the patients was most frequently German (72.2 %), followed by Russian (14.2 %), and Polish (2.9 %). HCV genotype (GT) 1 was found in 73.8 % (1a 29.0 %, 1b 38.4 %), GT2 in 3.5 %, GT3 in 18.3 %, GT4 in 4.2 %, GT5 in 0.2 %, and GT6 in 0.3 %. Liver cirrhosis was diagnosed in 15.7 % of the patients (17.1 % male, 13.7 % female). 43.2 % of the patients had already received HCV treatment, most frequently dual therapy with pegIFN + RBV (75.8 %) or triple therapy with telaprevir or boceprevir (20.3 %). Compared to treatment-naïve patients, pretreated HCV patients were older (55.1 vs. 50.3 years) and more frequently had liver cirrhosis as clinical diagnosis (22.2 % vs. 10.8 %). Patients scheduled for HCV treatment within the next 3 months had higher rates of pre-treatment (49.4 % vs. 37.0 %), and liver cirrhosis (21.4 % vs. 10.0 %).Compared to epidemiological data of Hüppe et al. 1 from 2003 to 2006, Klass et al. 2 stated in 2012 in a comparable setting that the German CHC population were older and had more advanced liver disease. The current data seem to support this ongoing trend towards more difficult to treat patients with an urgent need for new treatment options.

Impact of eradicating hepatitis C virus on the work productivity of chronic hepatitis C (CH-C) patients: an economic model from five European countries.

CH-C negatively affects work productivity (WP), creating a large economic burden. The aim of this study was to model the impact of sustained virologic response (SVR) on WP in CHC genotype 1 (GT1) patients in five European countries (EU5). Work Productivity and Activity Index-Specific Health Problem questionnaire was administered to patients across the ION clinical trials (n = 629 European patients). The analysis modelled a population of GT1 CHC patients over one year, who had been either not treated or treated with LDV/SOF. Sensitivity analyses assessed the possibility that CHC patients' labour costs were lower than the general population's and presented results by fibrosis stage. Before initiation of treatment, EU patients with CHC GT1 exhibited absenteeism and presenteeism impairments of 3.54% and 9.12%, respectively. About 91.8% of EU patients in the ION trials achieved SVR and improved absenteeism and presenteeism impairments by 16.3% and 19.5%, respectively. Monetizing these data, treatment with LDV/SOF resulted in an annual productivity gain of €435 million and a weighted average per-employed patient (PEP) gain of €900 in the EU5. PEP gains from treatment are projected to be higher in cirrhotic than in noncirrhotic patients. If CHC patients are assumed to earn 20% less than the general population, gains of €348 million (€720 PEP) annually are projected. CHC results in a significant economic burden to European society. Due to improvements in WP, SVR with treatment could provide substantial economic gains, partly offsetting the direct costs related to its widespread use.

Costs and outcomes of treating chronic hepatitis C patients in routine care - results from a nationwide multicenter trial.

Viral hepatitis is a major public health problem affecting millions of people worldwide. Long-term consequences are the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of the study was to assess outcomes and costs of treating patients with chronic hepatitis C in clinical practice in Germany. We carried out a prospective noninterventional study. Information on treatment outcomes, resource utilization and quality of life was provided by 281 physicians throughout Germany. Data of 3708 monoinfected HCV-patients treated between 2008 and 2011 were analysed. Therapy consisted of peginterferon/ribavirin. Mean age of patients was 43.7 years, 60.3% were male and estimated duration of infection was 13.6 years. Predominantly genotype 1 (61.3%) or 3 (28.5%) infections were observed. Sustained viral response (SVR)-rates in most frequently observed genotypes were 49.2% in GT-1 and 61.9% in GT-3 treatment-naive patients (Relapser: GT-1: 35.3% and GT-3: 57.3%; Nonresponder: GT-1: 25.0% and GT-3: 33.3%). Average treatment costs were lowest in treatment-naive patients (€18 965) and higher in patients who failed previous treatments (relapsers: €24 753; nonresponders: €19 511). Differences according to genotype were observed. Average costs per SVR in treatment-naive patients were €44 744 for GT-1 and €22 218 for GT-3. Treatment was associated with a decrease in quality of life; post-treatment quality of life was higher in patients achieving SVR. Our insight on real-life treatment outcomes and costs can serve as a reference for a comparison with other treatments. There is high need for short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness analysis in real-life settings as newly introduced treatment strategies with direct acting antivirals result in high SVR-rates but are more costly.

Real-life experience with first generation HCV protease inhibitor therapy in Germany: The prospective, non-interventional PAN cohort.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) and either boceprevir (BOC) or telaprevir (TVR), and physician adherence to treatment algorithms were evaluated in patients included in an ongoing non-interventional study (PAN) enrolling adults with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection managed in German office-based practices. METHODS: The analysis included HCV genotype 1-infected, treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients treated with BOC or TVR. Demographic, treatment history, virological response, safety, and patient management data were collected. RESULTS: Of a total 1087 patients, 58.1 % achieved sustained virological responses (SVR). Response rates were higher in treatment-naïve (BOC 55 %; TVR 63.4 %) and prior relapse patients (BOC 63.2 %; TVR 74.5 %) versus previous null-responders (BOC 14.3 %; TVR 25 %). The most commonly reported adverse event overall was fatigue (60.6 %); 45.8 % patients experienced hemoglobin < 10 g/dL. Patients with cirrhosis had lower rates of SVR versus those without (42.9 % vs. 60.7 %, respectively), and had a higher incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) (16.7 % vs. 8.6 %, respectively) and treatment discontinuation (44.6 % vs. 25.2 %, respectively). According to recommended response-guided treatment algorithms, about 70 % of patients were managed appropriately, 11/10 % (BOC/TVR) received unnecessarily extended therapy, and 19/7 % (BOC/TVR) received inappropriately shortened therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of BOC- and TVR-based triple therapy in this large, "real-world" cohort were largely comparable to that reported in pivotal clinical trials, although SVR rates were lower overall. Recommended futility or treatment extension rules were violated in a substantial proportion of patients with potential implications for response, adverse events and costs.

Therapy and prophylaxis of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients: a guideline by the German and Austrian AIDS societies (DAIG/ÖAG) (AWMF 055/066).

INTRODUCTION: There was a growing need for practical guidelines for the most common OIs in Germany and Austria under consideration of the local epidemiological conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The German and Austrian AIDS societies developed these guidelines between March 2010 and November 2011. A structured Medline research was performed for 12 diseases, namely Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, cerebral toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus manifestations, candidiasis, herpes simplex virus infections, varizella zoster virus infections, progressive multifocal leucencephalopathy, cryptosporidiosis, cryptococcosis, nontuberculosis mycobacteria infections and tuberculosis. Due to the lack of evidence by randomized controlled trials, part of the guidelines reflects expert opinions. The German version was accepted by the German and Austrian AIDS Societies and was previously published by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF; German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies). CONCLUSION: The review presented here is a translation of a short version of the German-Austrian Guidelines of opportunistic infections in HIV patients. These guidelines are well-accepted in a clinical setting in both Germany and Austria. They lead to a similar treatment of a heterogeneous group of patients in these countries.

Screening for autoantibodies in chronic hepatitis C patients has no effect on treatment initiation or outcome.

Autoantibodies in hepatitis C virus-infected patients may indicate autoimmune hepatitis or other immune-mediated diseases. This may impact safety and efficacy of interferon-based therapy of chronic hepatitis C. We investigated the association between a positive test result for a variety of autoantibodies and the initiation and efficacy of therapy for chronic hepatitis C. We analysed an observational cohort of 24 306 patients for an association between autoantibodies and treatment outcome. 8241 patients were tested simultaneously for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), liver kidney microsomal antibodies (LKM), smooth muscle antibodies (SMA) and antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA). Matched-pair analysis was performed matching one autoantibody-positive patient to three controls. Control patients had negative tests for all four antibodies. Analyses were performed for patients with a single positive autoantibody test and for patients with multiple positive autoantibody tests. A positive test result for ANA, LKM, SMA or AMA did not affect the physician's decision to initiate therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. In addition, a positive test for one or multiple autoantibodies did not adversely affect sustained virologic response. There was no difference in fibrosis stage or alanine transaminase at baseline or during therapy irrespective of antibody status. Thyroid dysfunction was more frequent in patients with positive LKM antibodies (P = 0.004). Initiation of therapy for chronic hepatitis C and outcome were not affected by the presence of ANA, LKM, SMA or AMA. Routine testing of these autoantibodies seems not warranted. Determination of autoantibodies should be guided by individualized clinical decisions.

Treatment results of chronic hepatitis C genotype 5 and 6 infections in Germany.

Chronic hepatitis C due to HCV genotype 5 and 6 infection is infrequently reported and patients are usually not included in trials. As boceprevir and telaprevir are not approved for these genotypes, pegylated interferon plus ribavirin will remain the treatment of choice for the coming years. Patients infected with HCV genotype 5 or 6 were identified by data base search from an ongoing observational cohort study in Germany. Of the total 23 893 patients, 39 patients (0.2 %) carried a HCV genotype 5 and 39 patients a HCV genotype 6 (0.2 %). Compared to other genotypes patients with genotype 5 were older and more often had a history of blood transfusion. Patients with genotype 6 were more often Asian and showed higher baseline alanine transaminase. Therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin was initiated in 24 patients with HCV genotype 5 and 27 patients with HCV genotype 6. After completion of 48 weeks of therapy an end of treatment response was achieved in 79 % and 81 % of treated patients, respectively. Sustained virological response was achieved in 58 % of patients with genotype 5 and in 59 % genotype 6 patients. HCV genotype 5 and 6 infections are rare in Germany. Our findings suggest that most HCV genotype 6 infections are seen in migrants from Asia, whereas HCV genotype 5 infections seem more due to spontaneous local infections. Sustained virological response seems to be better than for patients with genotype 1 or 4 with similar treatment duration.

[Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in Germany - results of a nationwide cross-sectional study]. / Epidemiologie und Klinik von Patienten mit chronischer Hepatitis B (CHB) in Deutschland - Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Querschnittstudie.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Knowledge about the epidemiology, demography and social status of patients with replicative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in Germany is still scarce. This cross-sectional study evaluated in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection, with a serum HBV-DNA concentration of at least 10,000 copies/mL (> 2000 IU/mL) at documentation visit, the epidemiology, socio-demographics, time of diagnosis, history of disease, prior therapies as well the therapeutic decision. METHODS: 74 German centres with predominately hepatologic focus, recorded in an online-survey the pseudonymised data of patients with chronic HBV-infection with a serum HBV-DNA-concentration of at least 10,000 copies/mL (n = 35). RESULTS: 65 % of the patients were male. The mean age was 40 ± 14 years. 63 % were immigrants (i. e., country of birth not being Germany). 37 % were HBeAg-positive. Mean ALT value 114 ± 183 IU/mL in males and 77 ± 176 IU/mL in females. ALT was above the upper limit of normal (ULN) in 59 % and 9 % of the patients were cirrhotic. The large immigrant groups, Turks (22 %), people from the former USSR (11 %) or from Southeast Asia (10 %) differed in terms of age, sex, HBeAg-status and clinical parameters clearly from each other as well as from German patients. 55 % of the patients from SE-Asia were female and overall considerably younger than German patients. 69 % of the patients with HBV-DNA > 10,000 copies/mL combined with ALT-levels above ULN, and 87 % with advanced fibrosis recieved antiviral treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This database currently contains the largest collection of epidemiological data of CHB patients in Germany. It therefore allows a representative overview on the disease in Germany. In Germany CHB epidemiology is triggered by migration from countries with higher CHB prevalence. However, the high proportion of patients coming from states of the former USSR is likely to be a historical peculiarity of Germany. The sometimes weak German language skills as well as the cultural specifics in the different immigrant groups are still a challenge for health-care providers. The high proportion of viraemic patients, already being treated, could indicate a suboptimal efficacy of the available therapeutic options at the time documentation.

[Expert opinion on boceprevir- and telaprevir-based triple therapies of chronic hepatitis C]. / Expertenempfehlungen zur Triple-Therapie der HCV-Infektion mit Boceprevir und Telaprevir.

With the approval of boceprevir and telaprevir the standard treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection will be the triple therapy of a HCV protease inhibitor together with pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin. In clinical studies a significant increase of sustained virological response rates from 38 - 44 % to 63 - 75 % for treatment-naïve and from 17 - 21 % to 59 - 66 % in treatment-experienced patients in comparison to the dual combination therapy with pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin alone has been demonstrated. In addition, a large number of treatment-naïve patients and relapsers benefit from shorten treatment durations to 24 - 28 weeks. However, important differences exist between the administration of boceprevir and telaprevir in terms of a pegylated interferon alfa/ribavirin lead-in phase, the duration of dosing of the protease inhibitor, the overall treatment duration, HCV RNA measurements for response guided treatment durations and stopping rules. Furthermore, triple therapies with boceprevir and telaprevir may be associated with selection of resistant viral variants, new adverse events and clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. The present review gives an overview on the results of underlying clinical studies together with a guideline for the practical management of boceprevir- and telaprevir-based triple therapies.

Randomized comparison of metabolic and renal effects of saquinavir/r or atazanavir/r plus tenofovir/emtricitabine in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the effects on lipids, body composition and renal function of once-daily ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (SQV/r) or atazanavir (ATV/r) in combination with tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) over 48 weeks. METHODS: An investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label, multinational trial comparing SQV/r 2000/100 mg and ATV/r 300/100 mg once daily, both in combination with TDF/FTC, in 123 treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected adults was carried out. The primary endpoint was to demonstrate noninferiority of SQV/r compared with ATV/r with respect to the change in fasting cholesterol after 24 weeks. Secondary outcome measures were changes in metabolic abnormalities, body composition, renal function, and virological and immunological efficacy over 48 weeks. Patients who had used at least one dose of trial drug were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Data for 118 patients were analysed (57 patients on SQV/r and 61 on ATV/r). At week 24, changes in lipids were modest, without increases in triglycerides, including a significant rise in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and a nonsignificant decrease in the total:HDL cholesterol ratio in both arms with no significant difference between arms. Lipid changes at week 48 were similar to the changes observed up to week 24, with no significant change in the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index. Adipose tissue increased regardless of the regimen, particularly in the peripheral compartment and to a lesser extent in the central abdominal compartment, with an increase in adipose tissue reaching statistical significance in the ATV/r arm. A slight decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was observed in both arms during the first 24 weeks, with no progression thereafter. The immunological and virological responses were similar over the 48 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Combined with TDF/FTC, both SQV/r 2000/100 mg and ATV/r 300/100 mg had comparable modest effects on lipids, had little effect on glucose metabolism, conserved adipose tissue, and similarly reduced eGFR. The virological efficacy was similar.

Estimating the likelihood of sustained virological response in chronic hepatitis C therapy.

The likelihood of a sustained virological response (SVR) is the most important factor for physicians and patients in the decision to initiate and continue therapy for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection. This study identified predictive factors for SVR with peginterferon plus ribavirin (RBV) in patients with CHC treated under 'real-life' conditions. The study cohort consisted of patients from a large, retrospective German multicentre, observational study who had been treated with peginterferon alfa-2a plus RBV or peginterferon alfa-2b plus RBV between the years 2000 and 2007. To ensure comparability regarding peginterferon therapies, patients were analysed in pairs matched by several baseline variables. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the effect of nonmatched baseline variables and treatment modality on SVR. Among 2378 patients (1189 matched pairs), SVR rates were 57.9% overall, 46.5% in HCV genotype 1/4-infected patients and 77.3% in genotype 2/3-infected patients. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, positive predictors of SVR were HCV genotype 2 infection, HCV genotype 3 infection, low baseline viral load and treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a. Negative predictors of SVR were higher age (≥40 years), elevated baseline gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and low baseline platelet count (<150,000/µL). Among patients treated with peginterferon plus RBV in routine clinical practice, genotype, baseline viral load, age, GGT level and platelet levels all predict the likelihood of treatment success. In patients matched by baseline characteristics, treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a may be a positive predictor of SVR when compared to peginterferon alfa-2b.

Efficacy and tolerability of peginterferon alfa-2a or alfa-2b plus ribavirin in the daily routine treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C in Germany: the PRACTICE study.

In randomized clinical trials, treatment with peginterferon plus ribavirin (RBV) results in a sustained virological response (SVR) in around half of hepatitis C virus genotype 1-infected and 80% of genotype 2/3-infected individuals. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of peginterferon alfa-2a plus RBV compared with peginterferon alfa-2b plus RBV for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in routine clinical practice. The intent-to-treat cohort consisted of 3414 patients treated with either peginterferon alfa-2a plus RBV (Group A) or peginterferon alfa-2b plus RBV (Group B) in 23 centres participating in the large, multicentre, observational PRACTICE study. Collected data included baseline characteristics, treatment regimen, RBV dose and outcome. Rates of early virological response, end of treatment response and SVR were 76.6%, 75.7% and 52.9% in Group A, and 70.2%, 65.6% and 50.5% in Group B, respectively. In patients matched by baseline parameters, 59.9% of patients in Group A and 55.9% in Group B achieved an SVR (P < or = 0.051). In genotype 1-infected patients matched by baseline parameters and cumulative RBV dose, SVR rates were 49.6% and 43.7% for Group A and Group B, respectively (P < or = 0.047); when matched by baseline parameters and RBV starting dose, SVR rates were 49.9% and 44.6%, respectively (P = 0.068). Overall, 21.8% of group A and 29.6% of group B patients discontinued treatment (P < or = 0.0001). The efficacy and tolerability of peginterferon plus RBV in this large cohort of patients treated in routine daily practice was similar to that in randomized clinical trials. In matched pairs analyses, more patients achieved an SVR with peginterferon alfa-2a compared with peginterferon alfa-2b.

Therapy of chronic hepatitis B: new goals and new treatments.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B has shown a rapid development in the last years leading to a shift of treatment strategies from interferon to hepatitis B virus (HBV)-polymerase inhibitors. In particular, treatment with HBV-polymerase inhibitors has changed the indication on how to treat a patient and when to stop therapy. Long-term treatment with HBV-polymerase inhibitors may often be required, even if it raises the possibility of resistance and subsequent treatment failure. This review provides a strategy on how to manage HBV therapy with the currently available treatment options.