Rectus Abdominis Muscle Atrophy and Asymmetry After Pulmonary Lobectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary lobectomy can result in intercostal nerve injury, leading to denervation of the rectus abdominis (RA) resulting in asymmetric muscle atrophy or an abdominal bulge. While there is a high rate of intercostal nerve injury during thoracic surgery, there are no studies that evaluate the magnitude and predisposing factors for RA atrophy in a large cohort. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 357 patients who underwent open, thoracoscopic or robotic pulmonary lobectomy at a single academic center. RA volumes were measured on computed tomography scans preoperatively and postoperatively on both the operated and nonoperated sides from the level of the xiphoid process to the thoracolumbar junction. RA volume change and association of surgical/demographic characteristics was assessed. RESULTS: Median RA volume decreased bilaterally after operation, decreasing significantly more on the operated side (-19.5%) versus the nonoperated side (-6.6%) (P < 0.0001). 80.4% of the analyzed cohort experienced a 10% or greater decrease from preoperative RA volume on the operated side. Overweight individuals (body mass index 25.5-29.9) experienced a 1.7-fold greater volume loss on the operated side compared to normal weight individuals (body mass index 18.5-24.9) (P = 0.00016). In all right-sided lobectomies, lower lobe resection had the highest postoperative volume loss (Median (interquartile range): -28 (-35, -15)) (P = 0.082). CONCLUSIONS: This study of postlobectomy RA asymmetry includes the largest cohort to date; previous literature only includes case reports. Lobectomy operations result in asymmetric RA atrophy and predisposing factors include demographics and surgical approach. Clinical and quality of life outcomes of RA atrophy, along with mitigation strategies, must be assessed.

Comprehensive Review of Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Features of Invasive Lobular Cancer.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 10% to 15% of breast cancers in the United States, 80% of which are estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, with an unusual metastatic pattern of spread to sites such as the serosa, meninges, and ovaries, among others. Lobular cancer presents significant challenges in detection and clinical management given its multifocality and multicentricity at presentation. Despite the unique features of ILC, it is often lumped with hormone receptor-positive invasive ductal cancers (IDC); consequently, ILC screening, treatment, and follow-up strategies are largely based on data from IDC. Despite both being treated as ER-positive breast cancer, querying the Cancer Genome Atlas database shows distinctive molecular aberrations in ILC compared with IDC, such as E-cadherin loss (66% vs. 3%), FOXA1 mutations (7% vs. 2%), and GATA3 mutations (5% vs. 20%). Moreover, compared with patients with IDC, patients with ILC are less likely to undergo breast-conserving surgery, with lower rates of complete response following therapy as these tumors are less chemosensitive. Taken together, this suggests that ILC is biologically distinct, which may influence tumorigenesis and therapeutic strategies. Long-term survival and clinical outcomes in patients with ILC are worse than in stage- and grade-matched patients with IDC; therefore, nuanced criteria are needed to better define treatment goals and protocols tailored to ILC's unique biology. This comprehensive review highlights the histologic and clinicopathologic features that distinguish ILC from IDC, with an in-depth discussion of ILC's molecular alterations and biomarkers, clinical trials and treatment strategies, and future targets for therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The majority of invasive lobular breast cancers (ILCs) are hormone receptor (HR)-positive and low grade. Clinically, ILC is treated similar to HR-positive invasive ductal cancer (IDC). However, ILC differs distinctly from IDC in its clinicopathologic characteristics and molecular alterations. ILC also differs in response to systemic therapy, with studies showing ILC as less sensitive to chemotherapy. Patients with ILC have worse clinical outcomes with late recurrences. Despite these differences, clinical trials treat HR-positive breast cancers as a single disease, and there is an unmet need for studies addressing the unique challenges faced by patients diagnosed with ILC.