Prediction of Aqueous Reduction Potentials of X•, ChH•, and XO• Radicals with X = Halogen and Ch = Chalcogen.

The aqueous electron affinity and aqueous reduction potentials for F•, Cl•, Br•, I•, OH•, SH•, SeH•, TeH•, ClO•, BrO•, and IO• were calculated using electronic structure methods for explicit cluster models coupled with a self-consistent reaction field (SMD) to treat the aqueous solvent. Calculations were conducted using MP2 and correlated molecular orbital theory up to the CCSD(T)-F12b level for water tetramer clusters and MP2 for octamer cluster. Inclusion of explicit waters was found to be important for accurately predicting the redox potentials in a number of cases. The calculated reduction potentials for X• and ChH• were predicted to within ∼0.1 V of the reported literature values. Fluorine is anomalous due to abstraction of a hydrogen from one of the surrounding water molecules to form a hydroxyl radical and hydrogen fluoride, so its redox potential was calculated using only an implicit model. Larger deviations from experiment were predicted for ClO• and BrO•. These deviations are due to the free energy of solvation of the anion being too negative, as found in the pKa calculations, and that for the neutral being too positive with the current approach.

NHC Carbene-Metal Complex Ligand Binding Energies.

The ligand binding energies (LBEs) of N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) and CH2 and CF2 adducts with group 1, 2, 10, and 11 metals and complexes with metals from these groups are predicted at the coupled cluster CCSD(T) level of theory by using density functional theory optimized geometries. The differences in LBEs as a function of the metal and the types of bonding interactions as well as the type of carbene are described. The bonding between the alkali cations and alkaline earth dications is predominantly ionic with a linear correlation between the LBEs and the cation hardness. In contrast, the bonding behaviors of the group 10 and 11 metals and metal complexes have only a weak, indirect correlation between the LBEs and the metal hardness. The difference in bonding behavior between the groups of metals arises due to the accessibility of electron donation between the ligand and the metal in the transition metal complexes, which results in more covalent-like bonding behavior. The presence of the methyl groups on the NHC nitrogen results in only slightly more delocalized charge from the metal onto the ring, but there is significant redistribution of the charge on the ring. Saturation of the NHC ring had a much smaller effect on how the charge was distributed on the ring. The analysis of the bonding behavior of NHCs with various metal groups enables improved understanding of carbene-metal interactions to inform rational design of NHC-based systems.