The use of preoperative continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea following total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with sleep apnea, affecting up to 1 in 4 older men in the United States, may be at increased risk of postoperative complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including increased thromboembolic and cerebrovascular events, as well as respiratory, cardiac, and digestive complications. However, the extent to which the use of CPAP in patients with sleep apnea has been studied in TKA is limited. METHODS: A national, all-payer database was queried to identify all patients who underwent a primary TKA between 2010 and 2021. Patients who had any history of sleep apnea were identified and then stratified based on the use of CPAP. A propensity score match analysis was conducted to limit the influence of confounders. Medical complications, such as cardiac arrest, stroke, pulmonary embolism, transfusion, venous thromboembolism, and wound complications, were collected at 90-days, 1-year, and 2-years. RESULTS: The bivariate analysis showed inferior outcomes for sleep apnea with CPAP use compared to sleep apnea with no CPAP use, in terms of length of stay (5.9 vs. 5.2, p < 0.001), PJI (1.31% vs. 1.14%, p < 0.001), stroke (0.97% vs. 0.82%, p < 0.001), VTE (1.04% vs. 0.82, p < 0.001), and all other complications at 90-days (p < 0.001) except cardiac arrest (0.14% vs. 0.11%, p = 0.052), and aseptic revision (0.40% vs. 0.39%, p = 0.832), PJI (1.81% vs. 1.55%, p < 0.001) and aseptic revision (1.25% vs. 1.06%, p < 0.001) at 1-year, and PJI (2.07 vs. 1.77, p < 0.001) and aseptic revision (1.98 vs. 1.17, p < 0.001) at 2-years. CONCLUSION: Patients with sleep apnea have increased postoperative complications after undergoing TKA in comparison to patients without sleep apnea. More severe sleep apnea, represented by CPAP usage in this study led to worse postoperative outcomes but further analysis is required signify the role of CPAP in this patient population. Patients with sleep apnea should be treated as a high-risk group.

Looking for Holes in Sterile Wrapping: How Accurate Are We?

BACKGROUND: Defects in sterile surgical wrapping are identified by the presence of holes through which light can be seen. However, it is unknown how reliably the human eye can detect these defects. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to determine (1) how often holes in sterile packaging of various sizes could be detected; and (2) whether differences in lighting, experience level of the observer, or time spent inspecting the packaging were associated with improved likelihood of detection of holes in sterile packaging. METHODS: Thirty participants (10 surgical technicians, 13 operating room nurses, seven orthopaedic surgery residents) inspected sterile sheets for perforations under ambient operating room (OR) lighting and then again with a standard powered OR lamp in addition to ambient lighting. There were no additional criteria for eligibility other than willingness to participate. Each sheet contained one of nine defect sizes with four sheets allocated to each defect size. Ten wraps were controls with no defects. Participants were allowed as much time as necessary for inspection. RESULTS: Holes ≥ 2.5 mm were detected more often than holes ≤ 2 mm (87% [832 of 960] versus 7% [82 of 1200]; odds ratio, 88.6 [95% confidence interval, 66.2-118.6]; p < 0.001). There was no difference in detection accuracy between OR lamp and ambient lightning nor experience level. There was no correlation between inspection time and detection accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Defects ≤ 2 mm were not reliably detected with respect to lighting, time, or level of experience. Future research is warranted to determine defect sizes that are clinically meaningful. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study.