"Quality of Life after Varicose Vein Surgery in Patients with High-ligation and Stripping, External Valvuloplasty and Sapheno-femoral Redo Surgery".

BACKGROUND: High-ligation and stripping (HL/S) and external valvuloplasty (eVP) with the implantation of an external device to restore the valve's function, are surgical methods to eliminate reflux at the saphenofemoral junction. Furthermore, redo-surgery (RedoS) can be performed in terms of same side groin recurrences. It is unclear, if there is a difference in quality of life (QoL) between these 3 surgical treatment options. Therefore, it was the aim of our study to elucidate QoL in patients before and after surgical treatment at the saphenofemoral junction by comparing HL/S, eVP, and RedoS. METHODS: A total of 303 participants (156 HL/S, 81eVP, 64 RedoS) were recruited during the daily clinical routine. QoL was measured at admission and 6 weeks after the surgical procedure by means of SF-12 (12 item short form health survey) and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean value of Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire was 14.5 (SD 2.1) preoperatively and 4.9 (SD 3.3) postoperatively in the HL/S group, 16.4 (SD 1.4) preoperatively and 6.8 (SD 2.5) postoperatively in the eVP group and 15.5 (2.2) preoperatively and 5.8 (SD 4.2) postoperatively in the RedoS group, which was statistically significant (P< 0.05) in all groups. Postoperatively, the mean values were statistically significant within the groups. Concerning physical aspects of the SF-12 we found a significant improvement in the RedoS group, while mental aspects were significantly better in the HL/S and eVP group postoperatively. Nevertheless, the clinical relevance of these SF-12 differences is questionable under consideration of the minimal important difference. CONCLUSIONS: Varicose vein surgery leads to a significant improvement of QoL in all groups. The implantation of an external patch could have a negative influence in QoL.

Effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy in atherosclerotic disease: comparing the ASA low-response prevalence in CVD, CAD and PAD.

Although acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) reduces the risk of ischemic events in patients with atherosclerosis, a substantial number of incidents continue to occur. As only limited data exist we evaluated the antiplatelet effectiveness of ASA in patients with different manifestations of atherosclerosis as in cerebrovascular, coronary artery and peripheral arterial disease (CVD, CAD, PAD). For the evaluation of the antiplatelet effectiveness of ASA we used whole blood aggregometry (Chrono-log Model 590). The patients in the different subgroups received ASA 100, 200 or 500 mg daily. We analysed 737 consecutive patients: 47.5 % with CVD, 33.6 % with CAD, and 18.9 % with PAD. We identified 28.0 % of the CVD, 18.1 % of the CAD and 21.6 % of the PAD patients to be ASA low-responder (ALR). Comparing subgroups treated with 100 mg ASA, 36.4 % were ALR in the CVD group as were 13.1 % of the CAD and 21.6 % of the PAD patients. Multivariate regression analysis revealed an odds ratio for being ALR of 4.50 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.70-11.9) when 100 mg and of 2.97 (95 % CI 1.58-5.60) when 200 mg ASA was taken compared to a dose of 500 mg. Despite the proven benefits of antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic disease, current antiplatelet management is suboptimal as up to 36 % of patients failed to achieve an adequate platelet inhibitory effect. Our findings may explain, at least in part, the high rates of cardiovascular events observed in the course of atherothrombotic disease and support the need to improve antiplatelet therapy.