Efficacy and Safety of Lubiprostone in Patients with Opioid-Induced Constipation: Phase 3 Study Results and Pooled Analysis of the Effect of Concomitant Methadone Use on Clinical Outcomes.

Objective: The efficacy and safety of oral lubiprostone for relieving symptoms of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with chronic noncancer pain were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. These data were also pooled with those from two similar phase 3 studies to explore the effects of methadone on treatment response. Methods: In the primary study, adults with OIC (fewer than three spontaneous bowel movements [SBMs] per week) were randomized to receive lubiprostone 24 mcg or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary end point was a change from baseline in the frequency of SBMs at week 8 in patients without a prior dose reduction. For the pooled analysis, the efficacy of lubiprostone was compared with placebo in patients receiving methadone or nonmethadone opioids. Responders were defined as patients with nine or more weeks of nonmissing SBM data who had one or more additional SBMs per week from baseline for each week that data were available and three or more SBMs per week for nine or more weeks. Results: In the primary study, the change from baseline at week 8 in SBM frequency was similar in the lubiprostone and placebo groups (P = 0.842). In the pooled analysis, the response rate was significantly higher with lubiprostone treatment vs placebo for patients receiving nonmethadone opioids (P = 0.002) but was similar between lubiprostone treatment and placebo in patients receiving methadone (P = 0.692). The safety profile of lubiprostone was unaffected by methadone use. Conclusions: The phase 3 study did not meet its primary efficacy end point. However, analysis of pooled data from all phase 3 studies in the OIC clinical development program, stratified by methadone opioid usage, confirmed that lubiprostone is effective for treatment of OIC in patients taking nonmethadone opioids; no safety concerns were identified based on the type of opioid used.

A phase 2a, randomized, double-blind 28-day study of TZP-102 a ghrelin receptor agonist for diabetic gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis causes significant morbidity and treatment options are limited. TZP-102 a novel, macrocyclic, selective, oral ghrelin receptor agonist, was evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with diabetic gastroparesis. METHODS: A total of 92 outpatients were randomized to once-daily administrations of 10-mg (n = 22), 20-mg (n = 21), 40-mg (n = 23) TZP-102 or placebo (n = 26). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in gastric half-emptying time (T(½)) utilizing (13)C-breath test methodology and secondary endpoints included symptom improvement using patient-reported gastroparesis symptom scores (PAGI-SYM questionnaire) and patient and physician overall treatment evaluations (OTE). KEY RESULTS: Gastric T½ changes were not statistically significant between TZP-102 and placebo after 28 days of treatment at any dose. Clinical improvements (-1.0 to -1.4 point mean decrease in symptom severity) occurred in the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) component of the PAGI-SYM, which was significant vs placebo for all TZP-102 doses combined. Improvements became evident after 1 week of treatment. Significantly, more patients given TZP-102 (any dose) had a 50% reduction in baseline GCSI score (28.8%vs 7.7% placebo). Safety profiles were similar across groups. All TZP-102 doses were well-tolerated with no adverse cardiac, weight, or glucose control outcomes. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: TZP-102 for 28 days, at doses of 10-40 mg once daily, was well-tolerated and resulted in a reduction in symptoms of gastroparesis. The lack of correlation between symptom improvement and gastric emptying change is consistent with previous studies in diabetic gastroparesis, and emphasizes the value of patient-defined outcomes in determining therapeutic benefit.

Randomised clinical trial: rifaximin improves health-related quality of life in cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy - a double-blind placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a brain disorder that often results from cirrhosis due to viral hepatitis, metabolic and alcohol-related liver disease, and is characterised by cognitive, psychiatric and motor impairments. Recurrent bouts of overt HE negatively impact daily functioning and quality of life. AIM: To evaluate the effect of rifaximin on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in cirrhotic patients with HE. METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis in remission from HE (Conn score = 0 or 1) and a documented history of recurrent HE episodes (≥2 within 6 months of screening) were randomised to rifaximin 550 mg twice daily (N = 101) or placebo (N = 118) for 6 months. Concomitant lactulose was permitted during the study. The Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) was administered every 4 weeks, and time for occurrence of HE breakthrough was recorded. A longitudinal analysis using time-weighted averages of the CLDQ scores normalised by days on study therapy was used to evaluate the effect of treatment on HRQL, and between HE outcomes (HE recurrence, yes/no) irrespective of treatment. RESULTS: The time-weighted averages of the overall CLDQ score and each domain score were significantly higher in the rifaximin group vs. placebo (P-values ranged from 0.0087 to 0.0436); and were significantly lower in patients who experienced HE breakthrough compared to those who remained in remission (P-values were <0.0001). CONCLUSION: Rifaximin significantly improved HRQL in patients with cirrhosis and recurrent hepatic encephalopathy. A lower HRQL may predict recurrence of hepatic encephalopathy.

Trends in the utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate nationwide trends in the utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in relation to the advent of noninvasive methods of visualizing the biliary and pancreatic tree. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to calculate the age-adjusted rate for ERCPs performed from 1988 to 2002. The State Ambulatory Surgery Database (SASD) was used to evaluate trends in outpatient ERCPs from 1997 to 2003. Linear Poisson multivariate regression model was used to control for variations in age, gender, and ethnicity among the overall patient population. RESULTS: The NIS database contained 402,343 patients who had an ERCP performed from 1988 to 2002. The mean age for these patients was 60.21 +/- 19.56 yr old. From 1988 to 1996; the age-adjusted rate for ERCPs increased by nearly threefold, from 25.66 per 100,000 in 1988 to 74.95 in 1996. The rate of 74.95 in 1996 declined to a rate of 59.70 by the year 2002. The rates of diagnostic ERCPs in men and women were 26.76 and 31.58 per 100,000 in 1988-1990, respectively. This rate then increased to 35.66 and 43.18 per 100,000 in 1994-1996, which then declined to 29.01 and 29.06 in 2000-2002. The age-adjusted rate for therapeutic ERCPs in men and women was 13.74 and 15.61 per 100,000 in 1988-1990, respectively, which continued to increase throughout the time span to 38.76 and 43.75 in 2000-2002. The SASD revealed a continual decline in outpatient ERCPs from 25.45 per 100,000 in 1997 down to 16.17 per 100,000 in the year 2003. CONCLUSION: The utilization of ERCP dramatically increased from 1988 to 1996; however, since the advent of noninvasive diagnostic techniques such as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), there has been a steady decline in the utilization of diagnostic ERCPs from 1996 to 2002.