Penile prosthesis for erectile dysfunction in France: A six-year nationwide database analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Urological consultations for erectile dysfunction (ED) are increasing worldwide. Penile prosthesis (PP) implantations are performed when other treatments are unsuccessful. However, there is no data regarding PP implantations in France beyond the year 2016. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the changes in the number and type of PP implants used for the treatment of ED in France from 2016 to 2021 and the hospitalization rates following implantation using French national data from the Program for the Medicalization of Information Systems (PMSI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data on PP implantations in all France hospitals. PPs were coded into three types according to the Common Classification of Medical Procedures (CCAM). The number of patients admitted to hospital with complications twelve months after implantation was also recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 3675 men received 3868 PPs in France. A gradual increase in the total number of implanted PPs was observed, with an overall increase of 33.8%. In 2020, there was a sharp decline in the number of implanted PPs, primarily owing to the COVID-19 pandemic. The most commonly used implant was PPs with an extracavernous compartment, comprising 85% of all PPs. Twelve months after implantation, only 1-2% of the patients were rehospitalized. CONCLUSION: PP implantation surgeries are highly reproducible and have a low incidence of complications, in terms of rehospitalization after one year of placement (1.8%). Moreover, there was an increase in the demand for penile prosthesis implantations in France between 2016 and 2021. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 : Descriptive epidemiological study.

Predicting Complications After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Back to Simplicity.

BACKGROUND: Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) has a significant morbidity. Nephrometry scores have been described to predict the occurrence of complications. Their usefulness is debated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of three nephrometry scores (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness, anterior/posterior, location [RENAL], preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical [PADUA], and simplified PADUA Renal [SPARE]) to predict perioperative outcomes and compare their performance to the simple measurement of tumor size in a large cohort of patients who underwent RPN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 1581 consecutive patients who underwent RPN for small renal masses. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Tumor size, RENAL, PADUA, and SPARE scores were calculated based on preoperative imaging. Correlation between scores, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time (OT), and warm ischemia time (WIT) were calculated. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of overall and major complications. The area under the curve was used to identify models with the highest discrimination. Decision curve analyses determined the net benefit associated with their use. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median age was 62 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 52-70) and the median tumor size was 35 mm (IQR: 25-47). Postoperative complications were observed in 346 patients (21.9%), including 5.6% of major complications. All scores were significantly correlated with EBL, OT, and WIT. However, correlation coefficients were all <0.3, suggesting a weak association. Nephrometry scores and tumor size were significant predictors of overall complications in univariate and adjusted multivariable logistic regression model analysis. However, decision curve analysis demonstrated net benefit of tumor size comparable with all nephrometry scores. Finally, neither nephrometry scores nor tumor size was found to be associated with the risk of major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size has the same ability as nephrometry scores to predict perioperative outcomes of RPN. PATIENT SUMMARY: We evaluated the association between tumor size, nephrometry scores, and perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). We found that tumor size could predict perioperative outcomes of RPN as well as nephrometry scores.

Robot-Assisted Cystectomy and Ileal Conduit for Neurogenic Bladder: Comparison of Extracorporeal vs Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion.

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of extracorporeal (EXTRA) vs intracorporeal (INTRA) urinary diversion in patients undergoing robotic cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder. Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder in six centers between 2011 and 2020 were included in a retrospective study. Four centers performed exclusively INTRA urinary diversion all over the study period, one center performed exclusively EXTRA urinary diversion, and the last center performed EXTRA urinary diversion during a first period and INTRA during the subsequent period. Results: Ninety-seven patients were included: 66 in the EXTRA group and 31 in the INTRA group. There were 11 major (Clavien grade ≥3) postoperative complications in the overall population (11.3%) with no statistically significant difference between both groups (EXTRA = 12.1% vs INTRA = 9.7%; p = 0.99). The mean length of stay did not differ significantly between INTRA and EXTRA (13.1 vs 14.1 days; p = 0.44). The mean times to oral feeding and to return of bowel function were similar in the two groups (3.9 vs 3.5 days; p = 0.28 and 4.1 vs 4.1 days; p = 0.51, respectively). There was no incisional hernia in the INTRA group vs five in the EXTRA group (0% vs 7.6%; p = 0.17). Conclusion: The perioperative morbidity of robotic cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder appears to be relatively limited compared with the historical open series. Possibly due to the relatively small sample size, no difference was found between INTRA and EXTRA urinary diversion in terms of perioperative outcomes.