The ADAN scale: a proposed scale for pre-hospital use to identify status epilepticus.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The prognosis of status epilepticus (SE) depends on the time between onset and the diagnosis and start of treatment. Our aim was to design a scale with predictive value for pre-hospital diagnosis of SE. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 292 patients who attended the emergency department for an epileptic seizure. A total of 49 patients fulfilled the criteria for SE. We recorded the patients' history and clinical features. Variables independently associated with SE were combined to design a clinical scale. The performance of the scale was evaluated in a validation dataset of 197 patients. RESULTS: A total of 50.3% of the patients were male and the mean age was 55.9 years. The following features were more prevalent in patients with SE: abnormal speech (79.6% vs. 18.9%, P < 0.001), eye deviation (69.4% vs. 14.0%, P < 0.001), automatism (22.4% vs. 6.3%, P < 0.001), hemiparesis (24.5% vs. 10.9%, P = 0.011), state of stupor/coma (46.9% vs. 4.2%, P < 0.001) and number of pre-hospital seizures, i.e. two (34.7% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001) or more than two (51.0% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001). Based on these findings, we designed a scale that scored 1 point each for presence of abnormal speech, eye deviation, automatism and two seizures, and 2 points for more than two seizures. The predictive capacity of the scale for identifying SE in the validation dataset was 98.7% (95% confidence interval, 97.3%-100%) and 85.4% of patients with a score >1 had SE. CONCLUSIONS: A score >1 on the ADAN scale is a robust predictor of the diagnosis of SE in patients who experience an epileptic seizure. This scale may be a useful tool for clinical use and warrants further investigation.

Prognosis of status epilepticus (SE): Relationship between SE duration and subsequent development of epilepsy.

UNLABELLED: In animal models, SE duration is related to epileptogenesis. Data in humans are scarce, mainly in NCSE; therefore, we aimed to study the prognosis of SE de novo and which factors may influence subsequent development of epilepsy. METHODS: We evaluated patients with SE without previous epilepsy at our hospital (February 2011-February 2014), including demographics, etiology, number of AEDs, duration of SE, mortality, and occurrence of seizures during follow-up. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were evaluated. Median age was 69 (19-95) years old. Among them, 33.7% were convulsive. Regarding etiology, 59 were considered acute symptomatic (41 lesions, 18 toxic-metabolic), 17 remote or progressive symptomatic, and 13 cryptogenic. The median recovery time was 24h (30 min-360 h). In-hospital mortality was 29% (n = 26). After a median follow-up of 10 months, 58.7% of survivors (n = 37) showed seizures. Subsequently, we analyzed which factors might be related to the development of epilepsy, and we found that epilepsy development was more frequent with longer SE duration (37 vs. 23 h, p = 0.004); furthermore, patients with a toxic-metabolic etiology developed epilepsy less frequently (33% vs. 67%; p = 0.022). Epilepsy was also correlated (tendency) with focal SE (p = 0.073), a lesion in neuroimaging (p = 0.091), and the use of 2 or more AEDs (p = 0.098). Regarding SE duration, a cutoff of above 24h was clearly related to chronic seizures (p = 0.014); however, combining etiology and duration, the association of longer SE and epilepsy was significant in acute lesional SE (p = 0.034), but not in epilepsy with cryptogenic or remote/progressive etiology. After a logistic regression, only a duration longer than 24h (OR = 3.800 (1.277-11.312), p = 0.016) was found to be an independent predictor of the development of epilepsy. CONCLUSION: In patients with SE, the longer duration is associated with an increased risk of subsequent epilepsy at follow-up, mainly in symptomatic SE due to an acute lesion. It is unclear if it might be the result of a more severe injury causing both prolonged seizures and subsequent epilepsy, and therefore whether more aggressive treatment in this group might avoid this possibility. Most of the patients with cryptogenic or remote/progressive SE developed epilepsy regardless of SE duration. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Status Epilepticus".