Omalizumab in the treatment of Morbihan syndrome in an adolescent girl - case report and literature review.

Morbihan syndrome (MS) is characterized by solid facial edema, usually related to rosacea or acne vulgaris. The facial edema deforms the patient's features, can impair peripheral vision, and affects quality of life. Its pathophysiology remains unclear. The disease usually has a slow and chronic course. MS most commonly affects middle-aged Caucasian men with rosacea and is rare in people below 20 years of age. MS is a diagnosis of exclusion. There is no standard treatment for MS, though systemic isotretinoin and antihistamines are mainly used. We present the case of an adolescent girl with MS nonresponding to 19 months of isotretinoin treatment with add-on antihistamines. Therapy with monthly administration of omalizumab (anti-IgE) for 6 months was an effective therapeutic option, improving the quality of life. Our case is the second description of omalizumab use in Morbihan syndrome, the first in an adolescent.

Omalizumab in the treatment of Morbihan syndrome in an adolescent girl – case report and literature review

Morbihan syndrome (MS) is characterized by solid facial edema, usually related to rosacea or acne vulgaris. The facial edema deforms the patient’s features, can impair peripheral vision, and affects quality of life. Its pathophysiology remains unclear. The disease usually has a slow and chronic course. MS most commonly affects middle-aged Caucasian men with rosacea and is rare in people below 20 years of age. MS is a diagnosis of exclusion. There is no standard treatment for MS, though systemic isotretinoin and antihistamines are mainly used. We present the case of an adolescent girl with MS nonresponding to 19 months of isotretinoin treatment with add-on antihistamines. Therapy with monthly administration of omalizumab (anti-IgE) for 6 months was an effective therapeutic option, improving the quality of life. Our case is the second description of omalizumab use in Morbihan syndrome, the first in an adolescent. (AU)

Childhood asthma treatment based on indirect hyperresponsiveness test: Randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of indirect airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) test using hypertonic saline in determining the dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to maintain asthma control in children. METHODS: A group of 104 patients (7-15 years) with mild-moderate atopic asthma were monitored for their asthma control and treatment for 1 year. Patients were randomly assigned to a symptom-only monitored group and a group with therapy changes based on the symptoms and severity of AHR. Spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide, and blood eosinophils (BEos) were assessed on enrollment and every 3 months thereafter. RESULTS: During the study period, the number of mild exacerbations was lower in the AHR group (44 vs. 85; the absolute rate per patient 0.83 vs. 1.67; relative rate 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.346-0.717 (p < 0.001)]. Mean changes from baseline in clinical (except asthma control test), inflammatory, and lung function parameters were similar between groups. Baseline BEos correlated with AHR and was a risk factor for recurrent exacerbation in all patients. There was no significant difference in the final ICS dose between AHR and symptoms group: 287 (SD 255) vs. 243 (158) p = 0.092. CONCLUSIONS: Adding an indirect AHR test to clinical monitoring of childhood asthma reduced the number of mild exacerbations, with similar current clinical control and final ICS dose as in the symptom-monitored group. The hypertonic saline test appears to be a simple, cheap, and safe tool for monitoring the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma in children.

Skin prick tests are not useful for the qualification for venom immunotherapy in children.

Background: The basis for qualification for venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the fulfilment of both the clinical and immunological criteria. Diagnostic tests that confirm the immunological criterion of an IgE-mediated sensitization include skin prick tests (SPT), intradermal tests (IDT), and serum specific IgE (sIgE) for the culprit venom. Objective: This study aimed to assess the usefulness of SPT as the immunological marker in the diagnosis of insect venom sensitization in children with history of systemic reaction (SR) to insect sting evaluated by means of I-IV-grades Mueller's scale. There are no such studies in children. Methods: This cross-sectional study sample consisted of 416 children aged 3-18 years (mean age 10.6 ± 3.8), 76% males, all with the history of a systemic reaction (SR) after a Hymenoptera sting (48% of grade III/IV according to Mueller scale), diagnosed between 1999 and 2019 in the tertiary referral centre. The standard diagnostic tests were used. Specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values were computed to assess the diagnostic properties of the clinical tests to distinguish between mild and severe SR. To assess the relative value of an individual test in predicting the qualification to VIT we incorporated the Shapley value (SV). Results: Positive SPT results were found in up to no more than 3% of children; among them less than 1% had only positive SPT and were negative for sIgE and IDT. Approximately 85% of the children had detectable venom sIgE, followed by positive IDT (75%). Almost 70% of children had positive both sIgE and IDT results. In children with grade III/IV reaction, about 80% of children had positive results of both of these tests. sIgE and IDT had sensitivity >0.80, whereas SPT had high specificity (>0.97) in differentiating between mild and severe SR. Relative value of diagnostic tests in predicting qualification to VIT varied between venoms. Bee venom IDT had higher SV (0.052) than sIgE (0.041). In contrast, wasp venom sIgE had higher SV (0.075) than IDT (0.035). Conclusion: SPTs are not an useful immunological marker of venom sensitization in children, and eliminating SPT does not result in a loss of diagnostic accuracy. Limiting diagnostics to venom sIgE and IDT would shorten the procedure and reduce costs. Future studies are needed to determine if venom sIgE as the first line diagnostic test, with IDT added only if the venom sIgE is undetectable, is an optimal diagnostic process.