[Professional outcomes and psychological health after workplace bullying: an exploratory follow-up study]. / Esiti professionali e salute psicologica a seguito di vessazioni sul luogo di lavoro: uno studio esplorativo di follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The literature shows that workplace bullying can lead to negative consequences for both individuals' health and professional outcomes. Most of these studies used cross-sectional designs and self-report questionnaires and further research is needed in order to explore long-term effects of workplace bullying. OBJECTIVES: This follow-up study aimed to explore professional and psychological outcomes in a sample of subjects who required a specialized and multidisciplinary assessment for psychological problems related, in their opinion, to workplace bullying. METHODS: The sample includes 71 patients with a baseline diagnosis of work-related psychological disorder who were assessed at follow-up by means of a structured telephone interview. The interview included structured questions about professional career developments and psycho-somatic health, and administration of the General Health Questionnaire-12. RESULTS: 62.0% of the participants were currently working and, of these, 59.1% had changed workplace after experiencing mobbing. Patients who changed workplace scored significantly higher on job satisfaction levels (p<0.01) and showed lower levels of social dysfunction (p<0.01) compared to those who did not change their job. Patients with a baseline diagnosis of Adjustment disorder/Post-Traumatic Stress disorder had higher levels of general dysphoria (p<0.04) and social dysfunction (p<0.01) at follow-up than other patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings  stress the importance of an accurate diagnostic assessment of mobbing-related psychopathological disorder. Victims of workplace bullying require early and continuous psychological support in order to promote their psychological well-being and work reinstatement.

Work-related stress and bullying: gender differences and forensic medicine issues in the diagnostic procedure.

BACKGROUND: The attention of international agencies and scientific community on bullying and work-related stress is increasing. This study describes the gender differences found in victims of bullying and work-related stress in an Italian case series and analyzes the critical issues in the diagnostic workup. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2009 we examined 345 outpatients (148 males, 197 females; mean age: 41 ± 10.49) for suspected psychopathological work-related problems. Diagnosis of bullying was established using international criteria (ICD-10 and DSM-IV). RESULTS: After interdisciplinary diagnostic evaluation (Occupational Medicine Unit, Psychology and Psychiatry Service), the diagnosis of bullying was formulated in 35 subjects, 12 males and 23 females (2 cases of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and 33 of Adjustment Disorder). Fifty-four (20 males, 34 females) suffered from work-related anxiety, while work-unrelated Adjustment Disorder and other psychiatric disorders were diagnosed in 7 and 112 subjects, respectively. Women between 34 and 45 years showed a high prevalence (65%) of "mobbing syndrome" or other work-related stress disorders. CONCLUSIONS: At work, women are more subject to harassment (for personal aspects related to emotional and relational factors) than men. The knowledge of the phenomenon is an essential requisite to contrast bullying; prevention can be carried out only through effective information and training of workers and employers, who have the legal obligation to preserve the integrity of the mental and physical status of their employees during work.

[Work-related stress and mobbing: case series and gender differences]. / Stress lavoro-correlato e mobbing: casistica clinica e differenze di genere.

The attention of international agencies and scientific community on mobbing (bullying) and work-related stress is increasing. However, research on gender differences and etiologic agents is still limited. This study describes the gender differences found in victims of mobbing and work-related stress in an Italian case series. Between 2001 and 2009, at the Occupational Medicine Unit of our Institution we examined 345 outpatients (197 women and 148 men) for suspected psychopathological work-related problems. After interdisciplinary diagnostic evaluation, the diagnosis of "mobbing syndrome" was formulated, according to international criteria (ICD-I0 and DSM-IV), in a minority of cases: 35 subjects. In the other workers, we found pre-existing psychiatric conditions (not related to work), or altered relationships dynamics with the colleagues. Significant gender differences emerged among people with "mobbing syndrome": there was a high prevalence of women (65%), with medium to high level of education; the most affected age group was between 34 and 45 years; several occupations were involved, with a clear preponderance of office workers. Women are mostly harassed for personal aspects related to emotional and relational factors; men for the content of their work. The knowledge of the phenomenon is an essential prerogative to contrast mobbing; this can be realized, at a preventive level, only through effective information and training for workers and employers, who have the legal obligation to preserve the integrity of the mental and physical status of their employees during the work.

Delirium in patients admitted to a step-down unit: analysis of incidence and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a rather common complication among patients admitted in intensive care units (ICUs), and rather than a single entity, it can be considered a spectrum of diseases where, besides overt cases, there are also many subsyndromal forms. Although there are many data about ICU delirium, there are few data concerning this complication in patients transferred from the ICU to a step-down unit (SDU) once clinically stable. OBJECTIVES: With the present study, we wanted to assess the incidence of and risk factors for delirium and subsyndromal forms and their impact on clinical outcome in a group of patients transferred from an ICU to an SDU. METHODS: All patients transferred from an ICU to our SDU over a 2-year period were screened for delirium and subsyndromal delirious forms using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist, a simple tool already validated in the ICU. The following data were also recorded: demographic data, severity score (SAPS II), reason for admission to the SDU, length of stay, death rate, use of sedatives, impact of delirium on weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV). RESULTS: Among the 234 patients, the incidence of delirium and subsyndromal forms was 7.6% and 20%, respectively. Subsyndromal forms diagnosed at admission represented a risk factor for the subsequent development of delirium (odds ratio [OR], P < .0001). A previous episode of brain failure during ICU stay and older age were risks factors for the development of subsyndromal forms, whereas not needing MV was a protective factor. Delirium significantly prolonged the stay in the SDU but did not influence survival and the process of weaning from MV. Overall, the percentage of patients with an abnormal Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist score at discharge (5%) was reduced compared with that recorded at admission (18%). CONCLUSIONS: Delirium may still occur after discharge from an ICU in patients who are transferred to an SDU. The strategy of care adopted in the SDU seems to positively affect the recovery from a delirious state. Patients with subsyndromal forms should be promptly recognized and treated because of the risk of developing delirium. Weaning from MV is not hindered by delirium.