Ovarian Leiomyosarcoma as Incidentaloma during Postbariatric Abdominoplasty Surgical Procedure.

This case report addresses the discovery, surgical management, histology, and postoperative outcomes of an incidentaloma during the preoperative evaluation of a 58-year-old woman planning to undergo abdominoplasty and hernia correction after bariatric surgery. The patient's computed tomography scan revealed a large pelvic mass in addition to an enlarged uterus and an umbilical hernia. Subsequent surgical intervention included umbilical hernia repair, subtotal omental excision, and en-bloc removal of the uterine and ovarian structures. Histological analysis confirmed the mass as a high-grade utero-ovarian leiomyosarcoma. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy and demonstrated a positive response in follow-up imaging at 6 months, with reduced mass size and no significant lymphadenopathy. Both aesthetic and morpho-functional outcomes were satisfactory. The report highlights the challenges of diagnosing and treating incidentalomas, emphasizing the need for individualized management. It discusses the rarity of primary ovarian leiomyosarcoma and the surgical approach used. The case ultimately emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary clinical evaluations in ensuring comprehensive care for patients with unexpected radiological findings, such as utero-ovarian leiomyosarcoma.

Diabetes mellitus does not impact on clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after partial pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) ranges from 20 to 80%. In patients undergoing resection, it is unclear whether DM impacts on clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-PF). METHODS: To address this issue, data from 602 consecutive partial pancreatic resections were analyzed using univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: There were 120 patients with DM; 84 had longstanding DM and 36 a new-onset DM. The incidence of CR-PF was greater among nondiabetics (11.8% vs 5.0%; P = .043), who were also more likely to have a soft pancreatic texture (79.5% vs 46.0%; P = .001) or combined presence of soft texture and small pancreatic duct (high-risk pancreas; P = .001). All these variables did not differ when stratifying by DM type. Univariate analysis showed that gender (P = .005), body mass index (P = .05), DM (P = .043), pancreatic texture (P = .001), pancreatic duct size (P = .012), and the combined presence of soft parenchyma and small duct (P = .001) were associated with CR-PF. On multivariate analysis, DM resulted to be a negative predictor of CR-PF (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; P = .047). Additional variables associated with an increased probability of CR-PF formation were male gender (OR, 3.48; P = .002), soft pancreatic texture (OR, 2.19), pancreatic duct size <3 mm (OR, 1.79), and the combined presence of soft pancreas and small duct (OR, 2.24). CONCLUSION: DM is not a risk factor for CR-PF after resection of PDAC. The decreased incidence of CR-PF in diabetics is likely to be a consequence of a decreased frequency of high-risk features of the pancreatic gland (soft texture and/or small duct).