The Mobile Overdose Response Program: A mobile, low-threshold opioid use disorder treatment model in Philadelphia.

INTRODUCTION: Low-threshold substance use treatment programs may help overcome barriers for marginalized individuals. The aims of this study were to 1) describe participant characteristics and treatment outcomes for a multi-site, Philadelphia-based mobile program providing street-based buprenorphine initiation, stabilization, and referral to ongoing care and 2) examine associations between patient characteristics and successful linkage. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving buprenorphine through Prevention Point Philadelphia's mobile overdose response program from 9/2020-12/2021. We abstracted electronic medical record data, including patient characteristics, mobile program treatment, and care linkage. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the sample and assessed the association between patient characteristics and successful care linkage using multi-variable logistic regression. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-seven patients initiated buprenorphine in the program across six sites. Mean age was 46. Participants were majority men (67 %); 59 % identified as Black, 33 % identified as White, and 15 % reported Hispanic ethnicity. Most were publicly insured (74 %) and 30 % were unstably housed. Basedline engagement in primary care (32 %), psychiatric treatment (5 %), and counseling (2 %) were low. Most participants reported heroin or fentanyl use at intake (87 %), with high rates of IV drug use (37 %)., and co-occurring substance use and prior buprenorphine treatment experience were common.. 86 % completed ≥1 mobile follow-up visit, and 69 % completed ≥4 mobile program visits. 51 % of patients attended at least one visit at an outside site, and 30 % had ≥2 visits for buprenorphine prescriptions at an outside site. 35 % of the referrals were internal, meaning they went to University-based practices staffed by the mobile unit physicians. In a multivariable logistic regression model, internal referral was associated with significantly increased odds of effective care linkage (aOR 2.47, 95 % CI 1.20-5.09). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted community outreach with low-threshold substance use care facilitated treatment access among marginalized individuals. Participants showed high levels of engagement with the mobile program, but rates of outside care linkage, while comparable to retention in other low-threshold models, were lower. The only predictor of effective care linkage was referral to brick-and-mortar clinics staffed by mobile unit physicians. These findings support the importance of outreach beyond traditional health care settings to engage high-risk patients with OUD.

"Come try it out. Get your foot in the door:" Exploring patient perspectives on low-barrier treatment for opioid use disorder.

PURPOSE: Low-barrier treatment is an emerging strategy for opioid use disorder (OUD) care that prioritizes access to evidence-based medication while minimizing requirements that may limit treatment access in more traditional delivery models, particularly for marginalized patients. Our objective was to explore patient perspectives about low-barrier approaches, with a focus on understanding barriers to and facilitators of engagement from the patient point of view. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients accessing buprenorphine treatment from a multi-site, low-barrier mobile treatment program in Philadelphia, PA from July-December 2021. We analyzed interview data using thematic content analysis and identified key themes. RESULTS: The 36 participants were 58% male, 64% Black, 28% White, and 31% Latinx. 89% were enrolled in Medicaid, and 47% were unstably housed. Our analysis revealed three main facilitators of treatment in the low-barrier model. These included 1) program structure that met participant needs, such as flexibility, rapid medication access and robust case management services; 2) harm reduction approach that included acceptance of patient goals other than abstinence and provision of harm reduction services on-site; and 3) strong interpersonal connections with team members, including those with lived experience. Participants contrasted these experiences with other care they had received in the past. Barriers related to lack of structure, limitations of street-based care, and limited support for co-occurring needs, particularly mental health. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides key patient perspectives on low-barrier approaches for OUD treatment. Our findings can inform future program design to increase treatment access and engagement for individuals poorly served by traditional delivery models.

A Note on Preexposure Prophylaxis Preferences Among Women Who Inject Drugs.

ABSTRACT: We informed women who inject drugs about different preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) formulations; they then ranked their preferences. Daily oral PrEP was most preferred, followed by injectable PrEP and vaginal rings/gels, especially among women of color. Multiple PrEP options should be discussed with women who inject drugs to increase uptake.

Delivering Care to a City's Most Vulnerable Residents: A Harm Reduction Organization and Community Pharmacy Working Together to Reduce Health Disparities.

This report describes a public-private partnership supported, in part, by federal 340B funds between a community pharmacy and a harm reduction organization. The partnership provides life-saving health care services within a neighborhood disproportionately affected by substance use, poverty, homelessness, and crime and may serve as a model for other communities in need.

Multiple Victimizations and Overdose Among Women With a History of Illicit Drug Use.

The experiences of violence and overdose are highly prevalent among women who use illicit drugs. This study sought to ascertain whether multiple victimizations during adulthood increase the frequency of women's overdose. The sample comprised 218 women recruited at Philadelphia harm reduction sites during 2016-2017. Victimization was assessed as exposure to 16 types of adulthood violence. Three measures were constructed for multiple victimizations: continuous and categorical polyvictimization, and predominant violence domain. Negative binomial regression estimated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of lifetime overdoses from multiple victimizations. Lifetime history of opioid use (88.6%) and drug injection (79.5%) were common. Among overdose survivors (68.5%), the median of lifetime overdoses was 3. The majority of participants (58.7%) were victims of predominantly sexual violence, 26.1% experienced predominantly physical abuse/assault, and 3.7% were victims of predominantly verbal aggression/coercive control. Participants reported a mean of seven violence types; the higher-score category of polyvictimization (9-16 violence types) comprised 41.7% of the total sample. In multivariable models, one-unit increase in continuous polyvictimization was associated with 4% higher overdose rates (IRR: 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.00, 1.08]). Compared to women who were not victimized (11.5%), those in the higher-score category of polyvictimization (IRR: 2.01; 95% CI: [1.06, 3.80]) and exposed to predominantly sexual violence (IRR: 2.10, 95% CI: [1.13, 3.91]) were expected to have higher overdose rates. Polyvictimization and sexual violence amplified the risk of repeated overdose among drug-involved women. Female overdose survivors need to be screened for exposure to multiple forms of violence, especially sexual violence. Findings underscore the need to scale-up victimization support and overdose prevention services for disenfranchised women.

Overdose response among trained and untrained women with a history of illicit drug use: a mixed-methods examination.

Little is known about differences in bystander behavior among people who use drugs, trained and untrained in opioid overdose prevention. We examined three types of recommended overdose response - a 911 call, rescue breathing/CPR, and naloxone administration-among Philadelphia-based, predominantly street-involved women with a history of illicit drug use. The study utilized a convergent mixed methods approach integrating data from 186 quantitative survey responses and 38 semi-structured qualitative interviews. Quantitative findings revealed that compared to untrained women, trained women were more likely to administer naloxone (32.9% vs. 5.2%) and use two recommended responses (20.0% vs. 9.5%). No significant differences were found between the two groups in calling 911 or using rescue breathing/CPR. Qualitative findings indicated that barriers to enacting recommended overdose response were either structural or situational and included the avoidance of police, inability to carry naloxone or phone due to unstable housing, and perceived lack of safety on the streets and when interacting with strangers. Our study demonstrated that overdose training improved the frequency of naloxone administration among this sample of predominantly street-involved women. Future efforts need to focus on avoiding intrusive policing, scaling-up naloxone refill sites, and providing secondary naloxone distribution via drug user networks.

Circumstances of overdose among street-involved, opioid-injecting women: Drug, set, and setting.

INTRODUCTION: Current discourses about the causes of the overdose crisis largely focus on the harmful effects of drugs. Prior research, however, indicates that drug use experience is shaped by complex interactions of drugs with physiological and mental "sets" of people who use drugs and the wider social and physical "setting." Zinberg's "drug, set, and setting" theoretical framework was applied to identify patterns in circumstances leading up to women's overdose. METHODS: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 opioid-injecting street-involved women, clients of a Philadelphia harm reduction program. Qualitative analysis with deductive and inductive coding was utilized to examine transcripts for theory-driven and emerging themes. RESULTS: Ten out of 29 women attributed their overdose to "drugs," reporting the unpredictable quality of street opioids, concurrent use of benzodiazepines, or chasing the "high." Thirteen women reported "set" as a type of circumstance where their emotional states were affected by a "good" or "bad" day, leading them to unusual drug consumption practices. Six women described "setting" type of circumstances where their overdose was preceded by a recent change in context, such as release from prison, which prompted unsafe drug use to address physiological or psychological dependence on drugs. CONCLUSION: While all overdoses result from the pharmacological action of drugs, some overdoses were triggered by circumstances occurring in women's set or setting. Overdose prevention policies should embrace not only individual-level behavioral interventions, but also structural measures to address stress, social isolation, and risky drug use contexts that plague the lives of street-involved women who inject opioids.

Description and outcomes of a buprenorphine maintenance treatment program integrated within Prevention Point Philadelphia, an urban syringe exchange program.

BACKGROUND: Syringe exchange programs are uniquely positioned to offer treatment services to interested clients. Prevention Point Philadelphia recently expanded to offer buprenorphine maintenance treatment through its Stabilization, Treatment, and Engagement Program (STEP). OBJECTIVE: To describe the STEP model of care and report treatment outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients enrolled in STEP (October 2011-August 2014). Our main outcome measure was time retained in treatment, defined as time from treatment initiation to treatment failure. Secondary outcome measures were buprenorphine and opiate use, from urine toxicology screens. We analyzed retention in treatment using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates; patients who remained in treatment at the end of the study period were censored on that day. For buprenorphine and opiate use, we calculated the percentage of patients who were positive for buprenorphine and opiates in each month of treatment. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients enrolled in STEP, the median age was 41 (range 21 to 63) and 80% reported injection heroin use. Comorbidities were common: 33% had HIV infection, most reported anxiety (78%) or depression (71%), and 20% were homeless. The most common program outcomes were unplanned self-discharge (n = 29; 23%), incarceration (n = 20; 16%), and administrative discharge (n = 19; 15%). The percentage of patients retained in treatment at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months was 77%, 65%, 59%, and 56%, respectively. Among those retained, the percentage with a positive buprenorphine screen at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months was 88%, 100%, 96%, and 95%, respectively. The percentage with a positive opiates screen was 19%, 13%, 17%, and 16%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With a program that blended organizational and community resources, retention in buprenorphine maintenance treatment was comparable to retention rates reported from other settings. Further research should directly compare treatment outcomes in syringe exchange program-based settings versus primary care and specialty settings.

Use of naloxone nasal spray 4 mg in the community setting: a survey of use by community organizations.

OBJECTIVE: Naloxone hydrochloride, an opioid antagonist, has been approved as a concentrated 4 mg dose intranasal formulation for the emergency treatment of known or suspected opioid overdose. This new formulation is easier to use and contains a higher dose of naloxone compared with earlier, unapproved kits. A survey of first responders and community-based organizations was conducted to understand initial real-world experiences with this new formulation for opioid overdose reversal. METHODS: In August 2016, 152 US organizations known to have received units of the approved 4 mg dose/unit naloxone nasal spray (Narcan®1 nasal spray 4 mg; NNS) were surveyed regarding experiences using this formulation and availability of recorded data on these cases. Descriptive statistics were calculated based on the number of responses received for each item. RESULTS: Eight first-responder or community-based organizations provided case report data on 261 attempted overdose reversals using NNS, with survival reported for 245 cases. Successful overdose reversals were reported in 98.8% (242/245) of cases; most cases (73.5%; 125/170) reported a time to response of ≤5 minutes after NNS administration. Heroin was the substance reportedly involved in a majority (95.4%; 165/173) of these cases; fentanyl was reported to be involved in 5.2% (9/173) of the cases. Many reversals (97.6%; 248/254) involved administration of ≤2 units of NNS. Three deaths were reported (NNS was reported to have been administered too late for two cases [the individuals were deceased prior to NNS administration]; details were not provided for the third case). The most commonly reported observed events were "withdrawal" (14.3%; 28/196); "nausea", "vomiting", or "gagging/retching" (10.2%; 20/196); and "irritability" or "anger" (8.7%; 17/196). CONCLUSION: This survey of data provided by first-responder and community-based organizations indicated that NNS was successful at reversing the effects of opioid overdose in most reported cases.

Trend Analyses of Users of a Syringe Exchange Program in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: 1999-2014.

This study examines trends of injection drug users' (IDUs) use of a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, syringe exchange program (SEP) from 1999 to 2014, including changes in demographics, drug use, substance abuse treatment, geographic indicators, and SEP use. Prevention Point Philadelphia's SEP registration data were analyzed using linear regression, Pearson's Chi square, and t-tests. Over time new SEP registrants have become younger, more racially diverse, and geographically more concentrated in specific areas of the city, corresponding to urban demographic shifts. The number of new registrants per year has decreased, however syringes exchanged have increased. Gentrification, cultural norms, and changes in risk perception are believed to have contributed to the changes in SEP registration. Demographic changes indicate outreach strategies for IDUs may need adjusting to address unique barriers for younger, more racially diverse users. Implications for SEPs are discussed, including policy and continued ability to address current public health threats.

Fathering agency staff members' perspectives on domestic violence perpetration.

PURPOSE: To describe the perspectives of fathering staff regarding domestic violence (DV) perpetration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 85 fathering staff members was conducted to identify behaviors and barriers regarding inquiry about DV perpetration. RESULTS: Almost half (47.1%) of the surveyed staff reported never having identified DV perpetration. Routine inquiry was less likely if staff perceived low prevalence rates among their clients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.11, p = .001), did not have standard ways of asking (OR = 0.11, p < .001), or if they had never identified family violence before (OR = 0.07, p < .001). Increased years as a provider (OR = 6.62, p = .001) and DV training (OR = 7.29, p = .003) increased rates of DV perpetration inquiry. CONCLUSIONS: Staff of fathering agencies do not routinely screen for DV perpetration likely due to the interplay between individual and agency-level barriers. Appropriate training interventions can address identified barriers.

The effect of individual, program, and neighborhood variables on continuity of treatment among dually diagnosed individuals.

This study reviewed the medical charts of 271 patients diagnosed with co-morbid mental health and substance-use disorders who were discharged from a hospital acute inpatient unit to various outpatient treatment programs in Philadelphia. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology and logistic regression modeling were employed to investigate the effects of individual, neighborhood, and program-level variables on arrival to the first treatment appointment within 30 days of discharge. Four models are presented. The results of the study suggest that having had three or more treatment episodes prior to inpatient hospitalization, and living in a neighborhood in which temporary or transitional, and presumably, other low income housing is located, increased the likelihood of patients continuing with treatment in the community. Discharge to the preadmission address, a chief complaint of bizarre behavior, close proximity of two or more liquor and/or beer stores, a high density of narcotics anonymous (NA) and/or alcoholics anonymous (AA) meetings within the neighborhood, an axis I diagnosis of substance-induced mood disorder, and a urine drug screen positive for heroin reduced the likelihood of attending outpatient treatment. We conclude that geographic and community variables as they relate to substance abuse may add an important dimension to our understanding of patient functioning and well being in the community following inpatient treatment.