Thromboembolic events among patients with hepatitis C virus infection and cirrhosis: a matched-cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Portal vein thrombosis is a known risk among patients with cirrhosis, but the incidence of other thromboembolic events among patients with liver disease is inadequately delineated. This study examined the incidence of venous and arterial thromboembolic events in patients with cirrhosis and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and matched comparators. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with HCV or cirrhosis of various etiologies were identified from a large medical claims database and matched by age and sex to comparator cohorts. New-onset diagnoses of venous and arterial thromboembolic events were determined. The incidence rate of each event was calculated and rate ratios computed using Poisson regression models, adjusting for baseline factors. RESULTS: The study included 22,733 HCV-infected patients and 68,198 comparators, and 15,158 cirrhosis patients and 45,473 comparators. The incidence of any thromboembolic event was 233.4 events per 10,000 person-years for the HCV cohort and 138.5 per 10,000 person-years for the comparators; the adjusted incidence rate ratio for any thromboembolic event was 1.62 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48-1.77). For the cirrhosis patients and comparators, the crude rates of any thromboembolic event were 561.1 and 249.7 per 10,000 person-years, respectively. The adjusted incidence rate ratio was 2.28 (95% CI: 2.11-2.47). Arterial events, especially unstable angina and transient ischemic attack, were the most frequent events seen in both the HCV and cirrhosis cohorts, but venous events, especially portal vein thrombosis, showed a more pronounced elevation in patients with liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HCV and cirrhosis of various etiologies are at increased risk of several types of thromboembolic events. Physicians should consider this increased risk when managing patients with liver disease.

A cohort study of the risk of seizures in a pediatric population treated with atomoxetine or stimulant medications.

PURPOSE: Stimulant medications used for treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) can be associated with an increased risk of seizures. Atomoxetine is a non-stimulant medication approved for treating ADHD. This retrospective cohort analysis evaluated risk of seizures among pediatric patients naïve to ADHD medication therapy, with exposure to atomoxetine relative to stimulant medications. METHODS: Among members of a large US health plan from 1/1/2003 to 12/31/2006, aged 6-17 years, we identified initiators of atomoxetine or stimulants with no evidence of prior study drug use. We created study cohorts using propensity score matching within 6-month calendar blocks. The outcome was a seizure event in the 6-month follow-up period verified through medical record review. Relative risks (RR) based on current use of each study drug adjusted for baseline covariates were calculated using Poisson regression. We estimated hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazards models for the comparison of atomoxetine to stimulants based on initial cohort assignment. RESULTS: We matched 13,398 initiators of atomoxetine to 13,322 initiators of stimulants. We identified 97 seizure events. After adjustment, current atomoxetine therapy was associated with a non-statistically significant 28% lower risk of seizure compared to current stimulant therapy (RR 0.72; 95%CI 0.37, 1.38). The adjusted RR of seizure with atomoxetine compared to stimulants based on initial cohort assignment was 0.90 (95%CI 0.54, 1.49). CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support an increase in the risk of seizure with atomoxetine therapy. The risk of seizure was not significantly different between pediatric patients taking atomoxetine compared with those taking stimulants.

Risk of developing diabetes and dyslipidemia among adolescents with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia.

UNLABELLED: The risks of developing diabetes and dyslipidemia among adolescents with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder have not been well-characterized. This study was designed to characterize these risks and compare them among adolescents in the general population. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used claims data from a large U.S. health insurer to identify adolescents (13-17 years) with claims for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder from 1997 to 2006. Adolescents without evidence of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder were randomly selected for comparison. Study outcomes were new diagnoses of diabetes and dyslipidemia. RESULTS: We identified 17,884 adolescents with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and 188,059 for the general population cohort. The incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of diabetes was higher in the schizophrenia or bipolar disorder cohort [424.3 (95% CI: 344.5-517.3)] than in the general population cohort (90.0 [95% CI: 79.6-101.3]). The incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of dyslipidemia was 346.4 (95% CI: 274.9-431.0) in the schizophrenia or bipolar disorder cohort and 86.6 (95% CI: 76.4-97.7) in the general population cohort. The adjusted hazard ratios of developing diabetes and dyslipidemia in the schizophrenia or bipolar disorder cohort relative to the general population cohort were 1.76 (95% CI: 1.15-2.72) and 1.66 (95% CI: 1.22-2.28), respectively. Adolescents with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder treated with antipsychotics had a higher risk of developing diabetes and dyslipidemia than those who were untreated. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder had significantly increased risks of developing diabetes and dyslipidemia compared to adolescents without these disorders.

Follow-up study of a pharmacovigilance signal: no evidence of increased risk with risperidone of pituitary tumor with mass effect.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacovigilance studies of spontaneous adverse event report databases are used to raise hypotheses about potential safety events. Such studies have found a disproportionately higher number of pituitary tumor reports for risperidone. Because there is a high prevalence of clinically "silent" pituitary adenomas, any increased workup in risperidone users, for example, secondary to hyperprolactinemia, might account for the increased reports. We undertook a detailed study of medical record-confirmed newly diagnosed pituitary tumors with mass effect in patients prescribed antipsychotics to evaluate the effect of risperidone. METHODS: We conducted retrospective studies in 2 large administrative health care databases with access to medical records. Patients were classified into risperidone or other atypical antipsychotic exposure groups. Records with administrative codes indicative of possible cases in the follow-up period were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis of new pituitary tumor and presence of mass effects. RESULTS: The hazard ratio of confirmed pituitary tumors with mass effect was 1.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-1.9). Whereas the precision of the hazard ratio was limited by low event rates, despite examination of 409,823 patients' records, ancillary analyses supported the interpretation of no elevated risk. Evidence was found for detection bias that may explain previous pharmacovigilance findings. DISCUSSION: There was no evidence of increased risk of pituitary tumor with mass effect with risperidone in either cohort or case-control analyses. We cannot rule out a small risk (<2-fold), or a risk that may develop with additional years of exposure or follow-up, or a risk of microadenomas or prolactinomas.

Big data: the management revolution.

Big data, the authors write, is far more powerful than the analytics of the past. Executives can measure and therefore manage more precisely than ever before. They can make better predictions and smarter decisions. They can target more-effective interventions in areas that so far have been dominated by gut and intuition rather than by data and rigor. The differences between big data and analytics are a matter of volume, velocity, and variety: More data now cross the internet every second than were stored in the entire internet 20 years ago. Nearly real-time information makes it possible for a company to be much more agile than its competitors. And that information can come from social networks, images, sensors, the web, or other unstructured sources. The managerial challenges, however, are very real. Senior decision makers have to learn to ask the right questions and embrace evidence-based decision making. Organizations must hire scientists who can find patterns in very large data sets and translate them into useful business information. IT departments have to work hard to integrate all the relevant internal and external sources of data. The authors offer two success stories to illustrate how companies are using big data: PASSUR Aerospace enables airlines to match their actual and estimated arrival times. Sears Holdings directly analyzes its incoming store data to make promotions much more precise and faster.

Incidence of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis with statin and fibrate use in an insured US population.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis is not well characterized among patients taking statin-fibrate combination therapies. OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the rates of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis during periods of exposure to different statins and fibrates. METHODS: We retrospectively identified a cohort of patients who initiated a statin or fibrate between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2007, using a database of a large US health insurer. Patients were followed for the occurrence of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis, determined by clinical review of medical records. Exposure status during the study period was determined by electronic records of statin and fibrate dispensing. Incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for various combinations of fibrate and statin exposure were modeled, using Poisson regression. RESULTS: There were 1,116,805 patients who initiated statin and/or fibrate therapy, with 2.4 million person-years of observation. Seventy cases of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis were confirmed. Adjusted analyses showed a persistent increased risk of rhabdomyolysis with combination therapy, while statin and fibrate therapy alone showed similar, nonsignificant increases in risk. The adjusted IRR for a statin and fenofibrate was 3.26 (95% CI 1.21 to 8.80), while the adjusted IRR for a statin and gemfibrozil was 11.93 (95% CI 3.96 to 35.93) versus statin therapy alone. The individual IRs for statin monotherapy ranged from 0.00 to 3.34 per 100,000 person-years. The number needed to harm was lower for combination statin-gemfibrozil therapy (2753) compared with that for statin therapy alone (454,545). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis is rare, but higher in patients with concomitant statin-fibrate treatment than in patients on statin therapy alone. The rate found in this study is consistent with the known profile of the statin-fibrate treatment option for mixed dyslipidemia.

Coronary heart disease outcomes among chronic opioid and cyclooxygenase-2 users compared with a general population cohort.

BACKGROUND: We estimated the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary revascularization (CR) among users of chronic opioid therapy (COT) and compared risks across categories of morphine-equivalent doses of COT and comparator cohorts. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective claims-based study using de-identified data from a commercially insured population. A cohort of 148,657 adult users of COT, a matched cohort of the general population, and three cohorts of users of chronic cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor therapy totaling 122,810 were identified. Incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of MI and MI/CR were estimated. RESULTS: Adjusted IRRs for MI ranged from 1.21 (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 1.02-1.45) among those receiving low COT doses to 1.89 (95%CI, 1.54-2.33) among those receiving high doses compared with those receiving very low doses, averaging <15 mg/day. Similar patterns were shown for MI/CR. IRRs standardized to the age-sex distribution of the general cohort and adjusted for coronary heart disease risk factors showed 2.7 times the rate of MI and 2.4 times the rate of MI/CR in the COT cohort compared with the general population. Using the same analysis, COX-2 users had 1.7-1.9 times the rate of MI and MI/CR compared with the general cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic analgesic use with either COT or COX-2 was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes. These findings suggest either a selection of high-risk patients to chronic analgesic treatment, coupled with unmeasured or residual confounding, or a potential cardiovascular effect of these medications. Further research is warranted to evaluate causes for this association.

Hepatobiliary laboratory abnormalities among patients with chronic or persistent immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

Therapies for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) may be associated with abnormal hepatobiliary laboratory (HBL) values, but the epidemiology of these abnormalities is unknown in the ITP population. The study aim was to provide prevalence and incidence rates, as well as risk factors for abnormal HBL values among a cohort of patients with chronic or persistent primary ITP. Health insurance claims data from 3,244 patients with chronic or persistent ITP was examined to estimate the prevalence of abnormal HBL values: elevated levels of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). Incidence of abnormal HBL values was estimated in a sub cohort of 2557 (79%) patients without evidence of comorbidities related to secondary thrombocytopenia, liver disease, or abnormal HBL values during the 12-month baseline period. The baseline prevalence of ALT and AST > 3x the upper limit of normal (ULN) was 4.6 and 3.7%, respectively. The baseline prevalence of total bilirubin and ALP >1.5x ULN was 4.2 and 3.2%, respectively. The incidence rate of new HBL abnormalities (HBLA) was 1.24/1,000 person-years (95% CI: 0.52-2.56) for ALT>3x ULN and 0.41/1,000 person-years (95% CI: 0.08-1.32) for AST>3x ULN. HBLAs were significantly associated with male gender, liver disease, diabetes, congestive heart failure, lupus, hematological cancers, and HIV infection. In conclusion, the prevalence of HBLA, specifically ALT>3x ULN, among the ITP population is relatively high compared with atrial fibrillation, though within the confidence interval for that estimate. HBLAs were significantly associated with male gender, liver disease, and several other comorbidities, thus, distinguishing drug-induced liver injury in this population is clinically challenging.

Pharmacoepidemiology safety study of fibrate and statin concomitant therapy.

Combinations of statins and fibrates may be increasingly prescribed to achieve lipid goals in high-risk patients and those with other cardiovascular risk factors, such as mixed dyslipidemia. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare rates of hospitalization for specific diagnoses in a cohort of new users of statins or fibrates, using claims data from a large United States health insurer. New users of statin, fibrate, or statin-fibrate therapy from 2004 to 2007 were identified; followed for hospitalization with rhabdomyolysis, renal impairment, hepatic injury, or pancreatitis; and confirmed by medical record review. Incidence rates (IRs) were compared across categories of fibrate or statin use, with adjusted IR ratios estimated using Poisson regression. A total of 584,784 patients initiated statins or fibrates. The IR of rhabdomyolysis in statins was 3.30 per 100,000 patient-years; the adjusted IR ratio for statin-fenofibrate combinations compared to statins alone was 3.75 (95% confidence interval 1.23 to 11.40). The IRs of renal impairment and pancreatitis in statins were 108.87 per 100,000 patient-years and 45.76 per 100,000 patient-years, respectively; the adjusted IR ratios for statin-fenofibrate combinations compared to statins alone were 1.47 (95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.93) and 2.87 (95% confidence interval 2.05 to 4.02), respectively. The IR of hepatic injury with statins was 8.57 per 100,000 patient-years, with no risk difference between exposure groups. In conclusion, the risk for rhabdomyolysis was low, although higher in patients newly treated with statin-fibrate concurrent therapy than those treated with either as monotherapy. The risk for pancreatitis was higher in patients treated with fenofibrate, whether in combination with statins or alone.

Comorbidities in patients with persistent or chronic immune thrombocytopenia.

There is a paucity of epidemiological data on the risk of comorbidities in adults with persistent or chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). In this study, we compared the rates of cataracts, diabetes, renal failure, vascular events, lymphoma, and leukemia among patients with and without persistent or chronic ITP. Using administrative data, adult patients with medical claims for ITP from January, 2000 through September, 2006 were identified. An age- and gender-matched comparison cohort without evidence of ITP was randomly selected. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of each comorbidity among ITP patients relative to the comparison group was estimated using Poisson regression, adjusting for baseline covariates. A total of 3,131 patients with persistent or chronic ITP were identified, and 9,392 were selected for the comparison cohort. The adjusted IRRs were as follows: diabetes 1.73 (95% CI 1.36-2.20), renal failure 2.05 (95% CI 1.67-2.51), any vascular event 1.70 (95% CI 1.41-2.05), lymphoma 5.91 (95% CI 2.61-13.37), leukemia 19.83 (95% CI 5.84-67.34), and mortality 4.21 (95% CI 3.06-5.79). There was no increased risk for cataract or myocardial infarction in the ITP cohort. Patients with persistent or chronic ITP are at increased risk for several comorbidities including hematologic malignancies, relative to a matched comparison cohort.

Prognostic value of the Duke treadmill score for emergency department patients with chest pain.

BACKGROUND: The potential clinical utility of the Duke Treadmill Score (DTS) in the Emergency Department (ED) to risk-stratify patients with chest pain but negative cardiac biomarkers and non-diagnostic electrocardiograms is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether DTS was associated with 30-day adverse cardiac outcomes for low-risk ED patients with chest pain. METHODS: For this prospective, observational cohort study, the primary outcome was any of the following at 30 days: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization. DTS risk categories (low, intermediate, high) were compared with 30-day cardiac outcomes. RESULTS: We enrolled 191 patients, of whom 20 (10%) were lost to follow-up, leaving 171 patients (mean age 53.3 +/- 12.4 years, 54% female, 3.5% adverse event rate) for evaluation. Sensitivity and specificity of DTS for 30-day events were 83.3% and 71.5%, respectively, with a 99.2% negative predictive value (confidence interval 95.4-99.9) for 30-day event-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of low-risk ED patients with chest pain, DTS demonstrated excellent negative predictive value for 30-day event-free survival and facilitated safe disposition of a large subset of patients.

The thiazolidinediones rosiglitazone and pioglitazone and the risk of coronary heart disease: a retrospective cohort study using a US health insurance database.

BACKGROUND: The thiazolidinediones (TZDs), including rosiglitazone maleate and pioglitazone hydrochloride, are commonly prescribed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Although recent meta-analyses suggest there is an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) among rosiglitazone users, these findings were not supported by data from other studies. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this research was to compare the risk of MI, coronary revascularization (CR), and sudden death in patients who began rosiglitazone therapy versus those who began pioglitazone therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using information from a large health care database (with data available on approximately 14 million individuals). All initiators of rosiglitazone or pioglitazone from July 1, 2000, through March 31, 2007, for whom the first dispensing followed >or=6 months of health plan membership and the member's 18th birthday were identified. The propensity score method was used to create matched cohorts of patients in 3 treatment groups: TZD monotherapy, dual therapy (a TZD plus another antidiabetic agent), and TZD therapy with concomitant insulin. Follow-up continued to a change in treatment regimen, defined as regimen switch (ie, the addition of any antidiabetic agent to an existing regimen) or regimen stop (ie, the discontinuation of any component of the therapeutic regimen). Three outcomes that represent coronary heart disease were assessed for this analysis: MI, CR, and sudden death. The proportional hazards model, stratified by therapeutic regimen, was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of coronary heart disease risk associated with use of rosiglitazone relative to pioglitazone. RESULTS: Among 47,501 matched pairs of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone users, 72,104 (75.9%) were receiving TZD monotherapy, 17,822 (18.8%) were receiving dual therapy, and 5076 (5.3%) were receiving TZD therapy with insulin. Mean follow-up was 9.6 months with regimen switch as the censoring event and 8.4 months with regimen stop as the censoring event. For MI, the HR was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.12-1.62) through regimen switch and 1.41 (95% CI, 1.13-1.75) through regimen stop. For the composite outcome of MI, CR, and/or sudden death, the HR was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.97-1.22) through regimen switch and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.98-1.27) through regimen stop. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort analysis, MI was more common in users of rosiglitazone than in users of pioglitazone. The incidence of a combined end point of MI, CR, and/or sudden death in patients receiving rosiglitazone was not significantly different from that in patients receiving pioglitazone.

Use of a computerized forcing function improves performance in ordering restraints.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the effect of a computerized order entry system forcing function on improving timely renewal of restraint orders. METHODS: In this prospective study of 2 successive interventions, physicians received computerized reminders to renew or discontinue restraint orders before their expiration. The initial intervention allowed acknowledgement of this reminder without further consequence, changing at 6 months to deny computer access until addressed. We performed chart review on emergency department visits with restraint orders in 3 consecutive 6-month periods (A, B, C) separated by these 2 interventions, determining time to order renewal, number of restraint orders, renewal orders per hour in restraints, and time in restraints and evaluating variability in these values across study intervals. Statistical analysis for our primary outcome used the Mann-Whitney and variance ratio tests. RESULTS: Median time to order renewal decreased in periods B and C versus A by 64 and 56 minutes, respectively, with variability in this measure decreasing across all periods. Mean number of restraint orders in periods B and C significantly increased versus those in A (1.46 to 1.89 to 2.34), with corresponding increases in variability. Mean renewal orders per hour in restraint significantly increased in period C versus A and B, from 0.08 to 0.23 to 0.89, with increasing variability across all periods. Decreases in median time spent in restraints observed in periods B and C versus A of 45 and 105 minutes, respectively, trended toward but did not achieve significance, with significantly decreasing variability compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: The forcing function improved restraint reordering and variability in practice and may have contributed to nonsignificant reductions observed in time in restraint.

Myeloperoxidase to risk stratify emergency department patients with chest pain.

Previous studies suggest that serum myeloperoxidase (MPO) is a potentially useful biomarker to risk stratify troponin-negative patients with suspected myocardial ischemia. We hypothesized that the relationship between initial serum MPO levels would correlate with 30-day adverse cardiac outcomes for low risk emergency department (ED) patients with suspected myocardial ischemia. This prospective cohort study enrolled ED patients with chest pain or suspected myocardial ischemia, non-diagnostic ECG, and initially negative cardiac troponin I. We defined 30-day adverse cardiac events as death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization. We calculated summary statistics, standard deviation (SD), odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and receiver operating characteristics (ROC). We enrolled 159 patients who had a mean age of 55 ± 13, were 56% female, of whom 5.2% suffered at least one adverse cardiac event. MPO test characteristics were poor, with an ROC area of only 0.47 (CI 0.23-0.71). MPO levels were not associated with adverse events (OR 0.99, CI 0.98-1.01, p=0.62). The optimal ROC cutpoint to predict adverse cardiac events had poor sensitivity and specificity (57% and 52%, respectively). Mean MPO concentrations in the event group did not differ from the non-event group. In this limited cohort of low risk ED patients with chest pain, we were unable to demonstrate utility of MPO for risk stratification. If confirmed in larger studies, these findings may call into question the routine use of MPO for low-risk chest pain.

The effect of pharmacotherapy for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder on risk of seizures in pediatric patients as assessed in an insurance claims database.

PURPOSE: To estimate the rate of new-onset seizure in ADHD patients in relation to ADHD pharmacotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 34,727 patients, ages 6 to 17, with at least two insurance claims bearing ADHD diagnoses during 2003 in the UnitedHealthcare database. Incidence of seizure was calculated for observation time during treatment with atomoxetine and stimulants/bupropion. RESULTS: Seizure incidence among ADHD patients was 4.5/1,000 person-years (p-y; 95% confidence interval 3.7 - 5.5). ADHD patients who received any ADHD medication had an incidence of 3.8/1,000 p-y (3.0 - 4.8) compared to 8.7 (5.8 - 12.4) for patients who did not receive any ADHD medication. The relative risk (RR) for current vs non-use of atomoxetine was 1.1 (0.6 - 2.1). For stimulants and bupropion, the RR for current vs non-use was 0.8 (0.6 - 1.3). Elevated seizure risks were found in association with central nervous system (CNS) disease (OR 3.9, 1.2 - 10.9), CNS medications (OR 2.2, 1.3 - 3.6), metabolic disease (OR 2.9, 1.1 - 6.8), and psychiatric disease risk factors (OR 1.7, 1.1 - 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there was no statistically significant association between use of atomoxetine or stimulants and seizure risk in children ages 6 to 17 years with ADHD and without prior seizure disorder.

The state of regional health information organizations: current activities and financing.

Electronic clinical data exchange promises substantial financial and societal benefits, but it is unclear whether and when it will become widespread. In early 2007 we surveyed 145 regional health information organizations (RHIOs), the U.S. entities working to establish data exchange. Nearly one in four was likely defunct. Only twenty efforts were of at least modest size and exchanging clinical data. Most early successes involved the exchange of test results. To support themselves, thirteen RHIOs received regular fees from participating organizations, and eight were heavily dependent on grants. Our findings raise concerns about the ability of the current approach to achieve widespread electronic clinical data exchange.

Coronary heart disease outcomes in patients receiving antidiabetic agents.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence on the reduction of cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients treated with oral antidiabetic agents. OBJECTIVES: To compare the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary revascularization (CR) in type 2 diabetic patients treated with rosiglitazone, metformin, or sulfonylurea. METHODS: Using data from a large US insurer, we created propensity-matched cohorts. We identified hospitalizations for MI or CR. We calculated incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals for the outcomes and estimated risks from Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: We identified 26,931 initiators of monotherapy, 4,086 initiators of dual-therapy, and 2,346 initiators of combination with insulin therapy. There was no difference between the risk of the composite outcome with rosiglitazone monotherapy compared to metformin monotherapy (HR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.34), and similarly with rosiglitazone monotherapy compared to sulfonylurea monotherapy (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.67, 1.02). There was no difference in the risk of outcome with rosiglitazone in combination with insulin therapy compared to other oral antidiabetic agents in combination with insulin (HR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.59, 1.32). Overall, there was little difference in the risk of the composite outcome or of the individual outcomes of MI and CR comparing rosiglitazone therapies to non-rosiglitazone therapies (HR for composite outcome 0.93, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.10). CONCLUSIONS: The results from the monotherapy and the dual-therapy comparisons, though not individually significant, are consistent in suggesting that the risk of cardiovascular outcome events in patients using rosiglitazone may lie between the risks associated with sulfonylureas (higher incidence) and metformin (lower incidence).

The incidence of first provoked and unprovoked seizure in pediatric patients with and without psychiatric diagnoses.

PURPOSE: To estimate the rate of new-onset afebrile provoked and unprovoked seizure in a general pediatric population and subgroups of patients with and without psychiatric diagnoses other than attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 133,440 pediatric patients, between the ages of 6 and 17 years, and without history of seizure or prior use of anticonvulsant medications, with follow-up during 2003. The data source for this study was Ingenix's research database containing pharmacy and medical claims for members of a large US-based managed care organization. The main outcome measure was new-onset nonfebrile seizure. Incidence rates of seizure and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and expressed as rates per 100,000 person-years. RESULTS: There were 132 new-onset provoked and unprovoked seizures in 78,423 person-years of follow-up among the general pediatric population sample. The incidence rate of seizure among the general pediatric population was 168 per 100,000 p-y (95% CI 141-200). The incidence rate of seizure among patients without psychiatric diagnoses was 149 per 100,000 p-y (95% CI 122-180). The incidence rate of seizure among patients with psychiatric diagnoses other than ADHD was 513 per 100,000 p-y (95% CI 273-878). There were increases in the incidence rates of seizure in all of the seizure risk factor groups, but this was more pronounced among males ages 6-12 with psychiatric diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are consistent with previous reports showing that pediatric patients with psychiatric disorders have a higher incidence rate of seizure than the general pediatric population.

Empirically derived subgroups in rheumatoid arthritis: association with single-nucleotide polymorphisms on chromosome 6.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a disorder with important public health implications. It is possible that there are clinically distinctive subtypes of the disorder with different genetic etiologies. We used the data provided to the participants in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 15 to evaluate and describe clinically based subgroups and their genetic associations with single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on chromosome 6, which harbors the HLA region. Detailed two- and three-SNP haplotype analyses were conducted in the HLA region. We used demographic, clinical self-report, and biomarker data from the entire sample (n = 8477) to identify and characterize the subgroups. We did not use the RA diagnosis itself in the identification of the subgroups. Nuclear families (715 families, 1998 individuals) were used to examine the genetic association with the HLA region. We found five distinct subgroups in the data. The first comprised unaffected family members. Cluster 2 was a mix of affected and unaffected in which patients endorsed symptoms not corroborated by physicians. Clusters 3 through 5 represented a severity continuum in RA. Cluster 5 was characterized by early onset severe disease. Cluster 2 showed no association on chromosome 6. Clusters 3 through 5 showed association with 17 SNPs on chromosome 6. In the HLA region, Cluster 3 showed single-, two-, and three-SNP association with the centromeric side of the region in an area of linkage disequilibrium. Cluster 5 showed both single- and two-SNP association with the telomeric side of the region in a second area of linkage disequilibrium. It will be important to replicate the subgroup structure and the association findings in an independent sample.