Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg ; 51(1): 27-37, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28218551

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Adequate velopharyngeal function and speech are main goals in the treatment of cleft palate. The objective was to investigate if there were differences in velopharyngeal competency (VPC) and hypernasality at age 5 years in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) operated on with different surgical methods for primary palatal repair. A secondary aim was to estimate burden of care in terms of received additional secondary surgeries and speech therapy. DESIGN: Three parallel group, randomised clinical trials were undertaken as an international multicentre study by 10 cleft teams in five countries: Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Norway, and the UK. METHODS: Three different surgical protocols for primary palatal repair were tested against a common procedure in the total cohort of 448 children born with a non-syndromic UCLP. Speech audio and video recordings of 391 children (136 girls, 255 boys) were available and perceptually analysed. The main outcome measures were VPC and hypernasality from blinded assessments. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the prevalences in the arms in any of the trials. VPC: Trial 1, A: 58%, B: 61%; Trial 2, A: 57%, C: 54%; Trial 3, A: 35%, D: 51%. No hypernasality: Trial 1, A: 54%, B: 44%; Trial 2, A: 47%, C: 51%; Trial 3, A: 34%, D: 49%. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found regarding VPC and hypernasality at age 5 years after different methods for primary palatal repair. The burden of care in terms of secondary pharyngeal surgeries, number of fistulae, and speech therapy visits differed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN29932826.


Assuntos
Fenda Labial/cirurgia , Fissura Palatina/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Distúrbios da Fala/terapia , Insuficiência Velofaríngea/prevenção & controle , Pré-Escolar , Fenda Labial/diagnóstico , Fissura Palatina/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Internacionalidade , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Medição de Risco , Distúrbios da Fala/etiologia , Distúrbios da Fala/fisiopatologia , Fonoterapia/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Insuficiência Velofaríngea/etiologia
2.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg ; 51(1): 38-51, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28218556

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Normal articulation before school start is a main objective in cleft palate treatment. The aim was to investigate if differences exist in consonant proficiency at age 5 years between children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) randomised to different surgical protocols for primary palatal repair. A secondary aim was to estimate burden of care in terms of received additional secondary surgeries and speech therapy. DESIGN: Three parallel group, randomised clinical trials were undertaken as an international multicentre study by 10 cleft teams in five countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the UK. METHODS: Three different surgical protocols for primary palatal repair were tested against a common procedure in the total cohort of 448 children born with non-syndromic UCLP. Speech audio- and video-recordings of 391 children (136 girls and 255 boys) were available and transcribed phonetically. The main outcome measure was Percent Consonants Correct (PCC) from blinded assessments. RESULTS: In Trial 1, arm A showed statistically significant higher PCC scores (82%) than arm B (78%) (p = .045). No significant differences were found between prevalences in Trial 2, A: 79%, C: 82%; or Trial 3, A: 80%, D: 85%. Across all trials, girls achieved better PCC scores, excluding s-errors, than boys (91.0% and 87.5%, respectively) (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: PCC scores were higher in arm A than B in Trial 1, whereas no differences were found between arms in Trials 2 or 3. The burden of care in terms of secondary pharyngeal surgeries, number of fistulae, and speech therapy visits differed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN29932826.


Assuntos
Fenda Labial/cirurgia , Fissura Palatina/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Distúrbios da Fala/terapia , Fonoterapia/métodos , Transtornos da Articulação/etiologia , Transtornos da Articulação/terapia , Pré-Escolar , Fenda Labial/diagnóstico , Fissura Palatina/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Internacionalidade , Masculino , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Distúrbios da Fala/etiologia , Medida da Produção da Fala , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...