Survey of Waikato medical practitioners concerning cardiac pacing.

AIM: To assess the knowledge of Waikato medical practitioners concerning cardiac pacing and its indications. METHOD: Anonymous postal questionnaire. The responses received were compared with those of four New Zealand experts on cardiac pacing. RESULTS: 404 questionnaires were administered of which 204 (50%) were returned, (16.3% physicians, 22.7% JRMO's 61% general practitioners). Virtually all had ready access to diagnostic facilities and were satisfied with the service offered. Physicians were more likely to have referred patients and to have had personal experience with pacing. Practical matters, such as costs and length of the procedure were reasonably well appreciated. The complexity of the procedure, however, was overestimated. Pacemaker function was poorly understood. All practitioner groups were less likely to refer for pacing compared with the experts, but were more likely to refer in the presence of recurrent symptoms, particularly if the patient was elderly. CONCLUSION: A conservative approach to referral for permanent pacing exists in the Waikato region and this is unrelated to access to diagnostic facilities or referral difficulties.

Intravenous amiodarone bolus versus oral quinidine for atrial flutter and fibrillation after cardiac operations.

The safety and efficacy of amiodarone and quinidine in reverting atrial tachyarrhythmias after cardiac operations were compared in a randomized cross-over trial. Patients with sustained atrial fibrillation or flutter for more than 2 hours' duration, stable hemodynamic status, and prior digoxin therapy were randomized to receive either intravenous amiodarone, 5 mg/kg over 20 minutes (41 patients), or oral quinidine, 400 mg immediately and 400 mg in 4 hours (39 patients), with cross-over at 8 hours if reversion was not achieved. Thirty-six patients had a coronary artery operation, 35 a valvular operation, five had both, and there were four miscellaneous cases. There was a male:female ratio of 1.5:1 and a mean age of 58 years (range 23 to 75 years). Preoperative atrial fibrillation or flutter was present in nine patients, and four patients had an ejection fraction less than 40%. Twenty-five of 39 patients (64%) given quinidine first reverted to sinus rhythm, compared with 17 of 41 patients (41%) given amiodarone first (2p = 0.04). Side-effects occurred in 18 patients given quinidine and five patients given amiodarone (2p = 0.01). Two patients, both given quinidine, were withdrawn from the study. There was no correlation, with either drug, between serum levels and clinical efficacy. Multivariate analysis identified longer times from arrhythmia to treatment, preoperative atrial fibrillation, mitral valve operations, and concomitant propranolol therapy as factors predictive of failure to revert to sinus rhythm. Oral quinidine was more effective than intravenous amiodarone in reverting postoperative atrial fibrillation and flutter but caused more side-effects.

Treadmill assessment of an activity-modulated pacemaker: the importance of individual programming.

Maximum benefit from a rate-modulated pacemaker requires individualized programming of rate response settings. We tested an externally strapped activity-sensing pacemaker (Activitrax-Medtronic 8400) in eight healthy volunteers, to assess the pacing responses of the different rate response and activity threshold settings. Five males and three females, aged 20 to 70 years (mean 40), performed a total of 67 treadmill exercise tests, using a specific protocol designed to assess the activity-sensing unit. The external unit was compared to implanted units in four patients, to validate its accuracy. A reproducible sinus response to the treadmill protocol was observed, against which pacing responses were compared. The activity threshold determines the degree of activity required to elicit a pacing rate response, whereas the rate response setting determines the rate attained. Rates of 140 bpm were rarely achieved, despite vigorous exercise. The sensor responds rapidly to activity, not to physiologic demand; to increase in speed, not grade. Four patients performed repeated limited treadmill tests to determine their optimum program setting, with symptomatic status and the healthy volunteer sinus response as guides. These results, and those from the external Activitrax unit, suggest that LOW 6 and MEDIUM 6-10 settings will prove optimum for most patients.

Lyme carditis: an important cause of reversible heart block.

Lyme disease is a tick-borne spirochetal infection, characterized by erythema chronicum migrans and an acute systemic illness. The disease is endemic in many parts of the north-eastern United States. Without treatment, late rheumatic, neurologic, and cardiac complications frequently occur. We report four serologically confirmed cases of Lyme carditis in previously healthy young men (mean age, 45 years) from endemic areas. Each presented with severe symptomatic atrioventricular block, three with episodes of prolonged ventricular asystole. Two had permanent pacemakers implanted (one was later removed), and another, very nearly did, before diagnosis. All four patients were treated with antibiotics, and in each case their rhythm returned to sinus, though one patient has Wenckebach second degree block with atrial pacing at 120 beats/min 16 months later. Carditis occurs in 4% to 10% of cases of Lyme disease and usually begins 3 to 6 weeks after the initial illness. It manifests as a transient myocarditis with varying degrees of atrioventricular block. The diagnosis is made primarily on clinical grounds and confirmed by serologic testing. Temporary cardiac pacing is frequently needed by patients who have severe heart block with hemodynamic instability. The evidence suggests that, in most cases, the block is at the level of the atrioventricular node. The block generally resolves completely with antibiotic treatment. Complete heart block rarely persists more than 1 week and the long-term prognosis appears to be excellent. Consideration and prompt recognition of this potentially lethal, but reversible, cause of heart block is crucial in order to avoid inappropriate permanent pacemaker implantation.

Atrial electrogram analysis: antegrade versus retrograde.

Automatic discrimination between antegrade and retrograde atrial electrograms would prevent endless loop tachycardia and contribute to tachycardia detection algorithms. We tested its feasibility by comparing antegrade and retrograde atrial electrograms in 129 patients at the time of atrial lead implantation. Only unipolar, passive-fixation, endocardial, right atrial appendage leads were included. The mean antegrade amplitude was 4.2 +/- 2.2 mV, and retrograde 2.4 +/- 1.5 mV (P less than 0.001); the mean antegrade slew rate was 2.6 +/- 2.1 mV/ms, and retrograde 1.3 +/- 1.1 mV/ms (P less than 0.001). Morphology was similar in 84 patients (65%). The antegrade amplitude exceeded the retrograde by 1.0 mV in 67%, and by 0.5 mV in 81% of patients. Morphology and slew rate contributed little to the discriminating power of amplitude alone. Thus, amplitude criteria reliably distinguish antegrade from retrograde atrial activity.

Pacemaker implantation in children: a 21-year experience.

Forty-one children, 20 boys and 21 girls, aged 11 days to 19 years (mean 9.9 years) at initial pacemaker implant, were followed 1 to 248 months (mean 90 months). Ten (mean age 8.2 years) were implanted between 1966 and 1972 (Group I), 14 (mean age 9.9 years) between 1973 and 1980 (Group II) and 17 (mean age 10.9 years) from 1981 through April 1988 (Group III). Arrhythmias were congenital complete heart block in 19, postoperative heart block in 15, acquired heart block in 3, sick sinus syndrome in 3, and bradycardia-induced ventricular fibrillation in 1. Twenty-eight of 41 children had a transvenous implant: 40% of Group I, 71% of Group II and 82% of Group III. Thirteen were cephalic, four subclavian and 11 jugular. Generator site was pectoral in 19, abdominal in 12, intrathoracic in one, and retromammary in nine of 12 girls aged 10 years or more at implant. In Groups I, II and III, 5, 14 and 6 had VOO or VVI units; 5, 0 and 8 dual chamber (VAT, VDD and DDD) pacemakers; 0, 0 and 1 AAI; and 0, 0 and 2 rate-modulated (VVIR) units at initial implant. The average interval between pacer-related hospitalizations in Groups I, II and III was 20, 42, and 39 months. Complications included infection in six, hemothorax in one, and impending pacemaker erosion in one. Six patients died, one of pacer infection, four from primary cardiac disease, and one suddenly without apparent reason. Follow-up continues in 31: 14 are employed full-time, three are homemakers, eight are full-time students, and six are active pre-schoolers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical evaluation versus Doppler echocardiography in the quantitative assessment of valvular heart disease.

We tested the hypotheses that Doppler echocardiography has a higher accuracy than clinical evaluation in the detection of significant aortic and mitral valvular heart disease and that Doppler echocardiography is highly accurate as compared with cardiac catheterization for the assessment of valvular disease severity. Thus, cardiac catheterization for the assessment of valve lesion severity may be unnecessary in selected patients. We prospectively evaluated 75 consecutive patients, ages 20-74 years (mean, 52 years), with clinically suspected valvular heart disease. Specific clinical and Doppler echocardiographic criteria were used to categorize each valve lesion as absent, insignificant, or significant. Criteria for a significant lesion at cardiac catheterization was an aortic or mitral valve area less than 1.1 or 1.5 cm2, respectively, or equal to or greater than 3+ cm2 aortic or mitral regurgitation at angiography. In all valve lesions, Doppler echocardiography had a higher overall accuracy than clinical evaluation. Increases in accuracies of 28%, 19%, 15%, and 7% occurred for mitral stenosis, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and mitral regurgitation, respectively, resulting in overall accuracies of 97%, 100%, 95%, and 96%. Clinical evaluation alone made 28 errors (37% of patients and 19% of valve lesions assessed), and 17 of these errors (23% of patients and 12% of valve lesions) would have resulted in inappropriate management. In only four (24%) of these 17 patients, the attending cardiologist would not have proceeded to assess the valve at cardiac catheterization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)