Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in older adults: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: This project aimed to implement best practices for pelvic floor muscle training to manage urinary incontinence among older women in long-term care in Kerala, India. INTRODUCTION: Urinary incontinence is a prevalent and distressing condition that affects a significant proportion of older adults and is characterized by involuntary loss of urine, leading to social embarrassment, decreased quality of life, and increased health care costs. It is more prevalent in women and is associated with dementia, limited mobility, and other comorbidities in long-term care. Pelvic floor muscle training is a first-line treatment option for urinary incontinence in older adults, given its potential to improve quality of life and reduce health care costs. METHODS: This project was based on the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. A baseline audit was conducted to evaluate current practice against best practices. After identifying barriers and implementing strategies, follow-up audits were conducted after 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: The baseline audit showed 0% compliance with all best practices. Barriers such as lack of knowledge and practice of pelvic floor exercises for urinary incontinence among participants and nurses; unknown cognitive status; and health emergencies were identified. Strategies including video-assisted training of pelvic floor muscle exercises, training calendars, and flip charts with instructions. The follow-up audits showed significant improvements in compliance. CONCLUSIONS: This project reduced urinary incontinence in the participants. Although two of the audit criteria did not reach 100% compliance by the end of 6 months, the stakeholders of the long-term care facility understood the importance of pelvic floor muscle training, which will be beneficial for future residents with urinary incontinence. SPANISH ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A211.

Early enteral nutrition support for patients with acute pancreatitis in the inpatient setting: a best practice implementation project.

INTRODUCTION: Acute pancreatitis is a major disease that endangers the health and lives of people. Historically, clinical therapy has recommended. that patients with acute pancreatitis remain nil by mouth. As one of the therapies recommended in recent guidelines, early enteral nutrition support reduces the incidence of infectious complications and reduces the risk of severe conditions. However, early enteral nutrition support has not been optimally implemented within clinical practice for acute pancreatitis inpatients. OBJECTIVES: This evidence implementation project aimed to increase compliance with best practice recommendations for early enteral nutrition support, while standardizing the enteral nutrition support process and reducing the incidence of delayed enteral nutrition. METHODS: The project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework, which is grounded in the audit and feedback process, as well as a seven-stage structured approach to identifying and managing barriers to compliance with recommended practices. RESULTS: In the baseline audit, compliance rates were low for all evidence-based audit criteria. Four of the eight criteria showed 0% compliance. However, after implementation, all eight criteria achieved a minimum compliance rate of 60%, with Site 2 achieving 90% to 100% compliance. In addition, nurses improved their knowledge and skills in early enteral nutrition support. The incidence of delayed enteral nutrition also fell from 86.2% to 20.7% at both study sites. The implementation strategy included a training program, psychological interventions, and financial and human resource support. CONCLUSION: This project not only significantly improved early enteral nutrition support for acute pancreatitis patients, but also increased nurses' knowledge and practice skills, standardized the process of enteral nutrition support, and reduced the incidence of delayed enteral nutrition. SPANISH ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A177.

Providing a scaffold for considering theoretical frameworks in evidence implementation projects: the JBI approach to evidence implementation.

ABSTRACT: There are many theories, models, and frameworks that have been proposed in the field of implementation science. Despite this, many evidence implementation or practice improvement projects do not consider these theories, models, or frameworks in their improvement efforts. The JBI approach is one example of an implementation theory, model, or framework. This approach has been developed particularly with health care professionals in mind and is designed to clearly guide pragmatic evidence implementation efforts based on the best available evidence. In this paper, we discuss how the JBI approach to evidence implementation can interact with and support theory-informed, pragmatic evidence implementation projects.

Facilitation in evidence implementation - experiences, challenges, and determinants of perceived effectiveness: a qualitative systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Facilitation is a key element of evidence implementation. Although quantitative systematic reviews have been undertaken to examine its components and effectiveness, no attempt has been made to synthesize qualitative evidence examining the experiences of facilitators on how facilitation is operationalized, the challenges associated with it, and the factors that can influence its perceived effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted using the JBI methodology. RESULTS: A total of 36 qualitative studies was included in the systematic review, with the majority being assessed as high quality following critical appraisal. The findings were extracted and further synthesized, highlighting that facilitation involves providing technical and non-technical support to health professionals, as well as high-intensity collaborations and relationship building. Determinants of perceived effectiveness of facilitation include facilitators' access to resources and learning support; their skills, traits/attitudes, and approach to facilitation; and the context of the organization where the implementation occurs. Work demands, emotional stress, and lack of clarity in roles and career development can pose challenges for facilitators. CONCLUSION: To maximize the outcomes of facilitation in evidence implementation, the team of facilitators should be carefully selected to ensure they have the right skills, traits/attitudes, and approach to facilitation. They should also be provided with dedicated time to conduct the facilitation and have access to resources, training, and mentoring support. Future research should aim to examine the perspectives of the "implementers" who received support from facilitators to gain a better understanding of which facilitation strategies have an impact on clinical practice behavior. REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42023402496.

JBI's approach to evidence implementation: a 7-phase process model to support and guide getting evidence into practice.

ABSTRACT: In this paper, we provide an overview of JBI's approach to evidence implementation and describe the supporting process model that aligns with this approach. The central tenets of JBI's approach to implementing evidence into practice include the use of evidence-based audit and feedback, identification of the context in which evidence is being implemented, facilitation of any change, and an evaluation process. A pragmatic and practical seven-phased approach is outlined to assist with the 'planning' and 'doing' of getting evidence into practice, focusing on clinicians as change agents for implementing evidence in clinical and policy settings. Further research and development is required to formally evaluate the robustness of the approach to better understand the complex nature of evidence implementation.

Methods for developing quality indicators for evidence implementation: a scoping review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this scoping review is to locate, identify, and understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to the development of quality indicators within evidence implementation health care programs. INTRODUCTION: Health care organizations evaluate care using quality improvement initiatives, which are based on quality indicators that are clearly defined and measure what they are intended to, based on structures, processes, or outcomes of care. However, the development of quality indicators is an area plagued by inconsistency and issues in terms of their pragmatic use in the health care context. Inconsistency when using terminology related to quality improvement has highlighted issues with distinct definitions, and many terms appear to be used interchangeably. This leads to confusion and a lack of clarity in what these terms are actually describing with regard to measures of quality in health care. INCLUSION CRITERIA: The proposed review will consider studies, guidelines, manuals, evidence syntheses, and other relevant literature that examine the key concepts, terms, or definitions used in the development of quality indicators and that identify the methods or frameworks used in the development approaches across the international health care setting. METHODS: The search strategy will aim to locate both published and unpublished documents, using a 3-step search strategy. Results of the search, study inclusion, data extraction, and analysis and presentation of results will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers, in accordance with JBI's methodology for conducting scoping reviews.Findings will be presented in tables or visual charts, accompanied by a narrative summary. DETAILS OF THIS REVIEW PROJECT ARE AVAILABLE AT: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/54q8j.

Facilitation as a component of evidence implementation: a multinational perspective.

BACKGROUND: Facilitation is a key component of JBI's approach to evidence implementation along with context analysis and evaluation of process and outcomes. Although the role of facilitation is recognized as a critical component of evidence implementation, what constitutes effective facilitation is poorly understood. AIM: This article presents a descriptive exploration of facilitation as it occurs in evidence implementation initiatives conducted in various healthcare and geographical contexts. All projects used the JBI approach to evidence implementation. METHODS: To provide a multinational perspective on how facilitation was operationalized to promote positive changes in clinical practice and health outcomes, five case studies of evidence implementation projects are presented. RESULTS: The cases highlighted that facilitation is a multifaceted process that can be met through a variety of roles that address aspects of education and capacity building, partnerships, action planning, problem solving and evaluation. Facilitation in all cases appeared to be collaborative, with multiple 'players' within and outside of the health organization being involved in the process. Although there are similarities in activities, facilitation involved some level of local contextualization where there were unique or additional activities performed to accommodate the local needs and requirements of the health organization involved in each case. Numerous contextual factors influenced the success of the implementation initiative. CONCLUSION: The cases emphasized the complex nature of facilitation as a strategy for evidence implementation, indicating that contextual attributes and features define the range of knowledge, skills, and activities that should take place in order for facilitation to be effective. Although there appears to be some core components, tailoring and adaptation of the facilitation process (or roles) is required.

Experiences of health professionals in screening for postpartum depressive symptoms: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This review will assess and synthesize the available qualitative evidence on the experiences of health professionals in screening for postpartum depression. INTRODUCTION: Postpartum depression is a significant public health problem. Clinical screening is essential to develop appropriate interventions to meet the needs of women and their families. The findings of this review will have important implications for decision-making and policy development for continuous professional development programs that promote evidence-based postpartum depression screening. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider studies that explore the experiences of health professionals who screen for postpartum depression in any geographic location at any health care level (primary, secondary, or tertiary). The review will focus on qualitative data, including methods such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research, and feminist research. METHODS: The review will follow a 3-step search strategy, in line with the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. The databases to be searched will include MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, LILACS, ScienceDirect, PsycINFO, Index Psi Periódicos, and PePsic. Unpublished studies will be searched for in Google Scholar, Cybertesis, Dart-E, EthOS, and OATD. Two independent reviewers will evaluate the included studies for methodological quality and extract data using the JBI data extraction and synthesis tools. There will be no language or date limitations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42021253792.

JBI series paper 3: The importance of people, process, evidence, and technology in pragmatic, healthcare provider-led evidence implementation.

In this paper, we describe and discuss evidence implementation as a venture in global human collaboration within the framework of "people, process, evidence, and technology" as a roadmap for navigating implementation. At its core implementation is not a technological, or theoretical process, it is a human process. That health professionals central to implementation activities may not have had formal training in implementation, highlights the need for processes and programs that can be integrated within healthcare organization structures. Audit with feedback is an accessible implementation approach that includes the capacity to embed theory, frameworks, and bottom-up change processes to improve the quality of care. In this third paper in the JBI series, we discuss how four overarching principals necessary for sustainability (Culture, Capacity, Communication, and Collaboration) are combined with evidence, technology, and resources for evidence-based practice change. This approach has been successfully used across hundreds of evidence implementation projects around the globe for over 15 years. We present healthcare practitioner-led evidence-based practice improvement as sustainable and achievable in collaborative environments such as the global JBI network as a primary interest of the practicing professions and provide an overview of the JBI approach to evidence implementation.

JBI series paper 2: tailored evidence synthesis approaches are required to answer diverse questions: a pragmatic evidence synthesis toolkit from JBI.

Evidence synthesis is critical in evidence-based healthcare and is a core program of JBI. JBI evidence synthesis is characterised by a pluralistic view of what constitutes evidence and is underpinned by a pragmatic ethos to facilitate the use of evidence to inform practice and policy. This second paper in this series provides a descriptive overview of the JBI evidence synthesis toolkit with reference to resources for 11 different types of reviews. Unique methodologies such as qualitative syntheses, mixed methods reviews, and scoping reviews are highlighted. Key features include standardised and collaborative processes for development of methodologies and a broad range of tailored resources to facilitate the conduct of a JBI evidence synthesis, including appraisal and data extraction tools, software to support the conduct of a systematic review and an intensive systematic review training program. JBI is one of the leading international protagonists for evidence synthesis, providing those who want to answer health-related questions with a toolkit of resources to synthesize the evidence.

Rapid reviews and the methodological rigor of evidence synthesis: a JBI position statement.

ABSTRACT: The demand for rapid reviews has exploded in recent years. A rapid review is an approach to evidence synthesis that provides timely information to decision-makers (eg, health care planners, providers, policymakers, patients) by simplifying the evidence synthesis process. A rapid review is particularly appealing for urgent decisions. JBI is a world-renowned international collaboration for evidence synthesis and implementation methodologies. The principles for JBI evidence synthesis include comprehensiveness, rigor, transparency, and a focus on applicability to clinical practice. As such, JBI has not yet endorsed a specific approach for rapid reviews. In this paper, we compare rapid reviews versus other types of evidence synthesis, provide a range of rapid evidence products, outline how to appraise the quality of rapid reviews, and present the JBI position on rapid reviews. JBI Collaborating Centers conduct rapid reviews for decision-makers in specific circumstances, such as limited time or funding constraints. A standardized approach is not used for these cases;instead, the evidence synthesis methods are tailored to the needs of the decision-maker. The urgent need to deliver timely evidence to decision-makers poses challenges to JBI's mission to produce high-quality, trustworthy evidence. However, JBI recognizes the value of rapid reviews as part of the evidence synthesis ecosystem. As such, it is recommended that rapid reviews be conducted with the same methodological rigor and transparency expected of JBI reviews. Most importantly, transparency is essential, and the rapid review should clearly report where any simplification in the steps of the evidence synthesis process has been taken.

Effectiveness of photobiomodulation therapy for nipple pain or nipple trauma in lactating women: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this protocol is to evaluate the effectiveness of photobiomodulation therapy for the treatment of nipple pain or nipple trauma in women during the breastfeeding period. INTRODUCTION: One approach that has been reported on the management of nipple pain or nipple trauma in lactating women is the use photobiomodulation therapy to heal the injury or to decrease pain intensity. However, studies have achieved different results, due to variations in the treatment protocol, such as the source of light used, the application mode, the irradiation, or the light dose parameters, leading to varying outcomes. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider studies that evaluate photobiomodulation therapy for the treatment of nipple pain or nipple trauma in lactating women in the postpartum period that compare the intervention to standard care, placebo, or other type of treatment. The following outcomes will be considered: intensity of nipple pain, healing of nipple trauma, exclusive breastfeeding rate, quality of life, and satisfaction of the women with treatment. There will be no publication time limit, and studies published in any language will be considered for inclusion. METHODS: This review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The search strategy will search both published and unpublished studies, and the process of study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis will be performed in accordance to the JBI approach. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42019147401.

Circulating leptin levels in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis, chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the review is to evaluate circulating levels of leptin in people diagnosed with myalgic encephalomyelitis chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia syndrome and to investigate the differences compared with healthy controls. INTRODUCTION: Myalgic encephalomyelitis chronic fatigue syndrome is a condition that has major symptoms, including self-reported fatigue, post-exertional malaise, and unexplained pain across the body. The widespread pain is measured in a systematic way and is often referred to as fibromyalgia. The two disorders have many similarities, but their association with leptin has indicated that leptin may affect the role of pro-inflammatory cytokines and symptom severity. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider observational studies of varying study designs including prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, time-series, and analytical cross-sectional studies that include both cases and healthy comparators. Cases will include a diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and/or fibromyalgia. Controls are people without this diagnosis, usually healthy participants. Only studies published in English will be included due to limited resources for translation. METHODS: This protocol will be reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist and will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of etiology and risk. A comprehensive search strategy will include PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Science Direct, and PsycINFO. Two reviewers will screen, critically appraise eligible articles, and extract data using a standardized data extraction tool informed by JBI SUMARI. The authors will complete a quantitative analysis that synthesizes findings across studies using pooled effect sizes and confidence intervals of the measures provided. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020169903.

Women's experiences of their interactions with health care providers during the postnatal period in Australia: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the review is to explore and evaluate women's experiences of interactions with health care providers during their postnatal period. INTRODUCTION: The postnatal period is a transformative time for women. Women experience significant change and adaptation, which could impact upon parenting confidence, health, and psychological outcomes during this time. The interaction women have with their health care providers during the postnatal period plays an integral role in improving these health outcomes. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This qualitative review will explore the experiences of primiparous and multiparous women during the postnatal period with a key focus on evaluating the interactions they have with health care providers. It will include all studies that utilize qualitative methods (such as interviews and focus groups). Articles that explore the postnatal care experiences of women who have endured a pregnancy loss, given birth to a baby with complex needs, or those that solely focus on describing the neonatal and intensive care experiences, will not be included. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, and PsycINFO will be searched. Studies published from 2000 onwards and written in English will be assessed for inclusion. Studies that are selected initially will be assessed for methodological quality by two independent reviewers utilizing the JBI critical appraisal instrument for qualitative research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020186384.

Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool.

INTRODUCTION: Systematic reviews provide a rigorous synthesis of the best available evidence regarding a certain question. Where high-quality evidence is lacking, systematic reviewers may choose to rely on case series studies to provide information in relation to their question. However, to date there has been limited guidance on how to incorporate case series studies within systematic reviews assessing the effectiveness of an intervention, particularly with reference to assessing the methodological quality or risk of bias of these studies. METHODS: An international working group was formed to review the methodological literature regarding case series as a form of evidence for inclusion in systematic reviews. The group then developed a critical appraisal tool based on the epidemiological literature relating to bias within these studies. This was then piloted, reviewed, and approved by JBI's international Scientific Committee. RESULTS: The JBI critical appraisal tool for case series studies includes 10 questions addressing the internal validity and risk of bias of case series designs, particularly confounding, selection, and information bias, in addition to the importance of clear reporting. CONCLUSION: In certain situations, case series designs may represent the best available evidence to inform clinical practice. The JBI critical appraisal tool for case series offers systematic reviewers an approved method to assess the methodological quality of these studies.

Promoting healthy lifestyle considerations during pregnancy in Midwifery clinics in China: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this project was to initiate and promote formal and individualized evidence-based education on healthy lifestyle choices during pregnancy for pregnant women. INTRODUCTION: Evidence suggests that lifestyle choices during pregnancy can have a profound influence on many pregnancy complications and chronic diseases such as preterm birth, diabetes, obesity, fetal growth restriction, breast cancer and hypertensive diseases in both pregnant women and their babies. It is widely accepted that formal, individualized, hospital-directed education about lifestyle choices during pregnancy should commence as early as the first consultation between pregnant women and maternal healthcare workers. METHODS: The methods of this project were audit and feedback. The approach to data collection used the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and implementation planning utilized the Getting Research into Practice component. A baseline audit of 50 observations of midwife-led education on prenatal lifestyle were conducted and measured against seven best practice audit criteria. Targeted strategies were then implemented to improve compliance to best practice. A follow-up audit was conducted over a 6-month period from June 2019 to November 2019. RESULTS: The baseline audit revealed significant deficits between current prenatal education practice and recommended best practice. Zero percent compliance was observed in six out of seven audit criteria, indicating that education provided did not conform to best practice. Total compliance (100%) was observed for one audit criterion at baseline, assessing pregnant women being offered an opportunity to discuss and ask questions regarding the education session or information they had received. Three barriers that prevented midwives from achieving compliance with best practice were identified, and a bundled education strategy was implemented. A follow-up audit indicated 100% compliance of all audit criteria. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrated that formal, individualized, midwife-led prenatal education and provision of relevant evidence-based resources had an immediate positive effect. The project helped to transform care givers' attitudes toward education regarding lifestyle during pregnancy from a passive routine 'must do' task to an active process with focus on healthy lifestyle and engagement of pregnant women. Future strategies such as support from hospital management and social media are planned in conjunction with follow-up clinical audits to ensure sustainability.

Facilitation of evidence implementation within a clinical fellowship program: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Facilitation is a multifaceted process for supporting and enabling individual or group of health practitioners to implement positive changes in clinical practice. Facilitation has never been explored within the context of an educational program that integrates a practical, evidence-based implementation component, such as a clinical fellowship program (CFP). The aim of this research was to identify features of facilitation as it occurs in the JBI (formerly known as Joanna Briggs Institute) CFP that promotes the use of evidence into clinical practice. METHODS: We used a mixed methods study design to address the objective of this study. An electronic survey was administered to clinicians of different clinical backgrounds who completed the CFP (i.e. clinical fellows). Purposively selected clinical fellows and assigned internal or external facilitators were interviewed. RESULTS: Forty-three clinical fellows completed the survey and 16 individual interviews and two focus groups were conducted. Findings from the survey and interviews demonstrated that facilitation within the context of a CFP is a collaborative effort between assigned facilitators and clinical fellows. Our study showed that both assigned facilitators and clinical fellows perform facilitation activities, with assigned internal and external facilitators providing support and assistance to clinical fellows, who in turn, support the evidence implementation project within their local organization. The study also suggests that external facilitation should be tailored to the individual clinical fellow's characteristics and their previous experiences. CONCLUSION: Facilitation in an evidence-based CFP involves a partnership between clinical fellows and assigned facilitators, indicating a collaborative effort that involves a set of internal and external facilitation activities. Our study findings can guide the delivery of CFPs, particularly in identifying suitable people for the facilitator's role, which can have important implications for evidence implementation. Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of these programs in improving practice and health outcomes.

Prechemotherapy nursing assessment among adult cancer patients in a university cancer center in Shanghai, China: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVE: The current implementation project aimed to promote evidence-based practice with prechemotherapy nursing assessment among adult cancer patients in a large university cancer center in Shanghai, China, over a 6-month timeframe. INTRODUCTION: Prechemotherapy nursing assessment is an essential element of cancer patient care, aiming to prevent or minimize potential problems from chemotherapy treatment. Regular comprehensive prechemotherapy assessment is not part of routine care currently in many clinical settings within China. METHODS: The project utilized the JBI approach to implementation, incorporating audit and feedback tools. Twelve evidence-based audit criteria were developed for use in the program. A baseline audit was conducted of prechemotherapy nursing assessment among adult cancer patients, with a sample size of 68 patients and 36 nursing staff. Following implementation of systematic strategies based on the analysis of three main barriers, a follow-up audit involving a similar sample as the first audit was conducted using the same audit criteria. RESULTS: The baseline audit indicated that for nursing assessment among adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, the criteria (1, 10, 11 and 12) which related to nurse education, weight measurement, premedication and access device assessment had very high compliance (from 93 to 100%). Compliance for criteria (2, 6, 7, 9) related to medical history, previous exposure to chemotherapy, patients' or caregivers' comprehension of treatment and psychosocial assessment was 0%, while compliance with the other five criteria (3, 4, 5, 8) was low, ranging from 16 to 61%. There was improvement in all 12 criteria in the follow-up audit. Criteria 1, 11 and 12 maintained high compliance (100%). Criterion 2 (patients' medical history), criterion 3 (presence or absence of allergies), criterion 7 (previous exposure to chemotherapy) and criterion 9 (psychosocial elements) demonstrated a significant improvement in compliance. Although progress has been made, there were still some criteria that require further improvement. These included assessment of patients' current diagnosis and cancer status (criterion 4, from 61 to 66%), recent laboratory results (criterion 5, from 31 to 62%), patients' and/or caregivers' comprehension of information regarding the disease and treatment (criterion 6, from 0 to 34%), any previous exposure to chemotherapy agents (criterion 7, from 0 to 57%), and physical assessment of the patient (criterion 8, from 46 to 72%). CONCLUSION: The project achieved increased compliance with evidence-based best practice in all assessed audit criteria improving the practice of prechemotherapy assessment. Involvement of informatics technology is a great strategy to help overcome barriers, simplify the change process and assist in sustaining evidence-based practice change. Future plans and ideas are in place and have been discussed. Further audits will need to be carried out to improve the validity and quality of nursing assessment.

Discharge following sedation for endoscopic procedures: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this project was to promote best discharge practice in sedated patients following endoscopic procedures in an endoscopy tertiary center in Shanghai, China. INTRODUCTION: Discharge of sedated patients is the final stage of the endoscopic procedure. Healthcare providers must ensure patient safety through timely and appropriate discharge from endoscopic procedures. METHODS: A clinical audit was undertaken using the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System tool. Eight audit criteria that were representative of best-practice recommendations for the discharge of sedated patients following endoscopic procedures were used. A baseline audit was conducted, followed by the implementation of multiple strategies that were determined by the key stakeholders. The project was finalized with a follow-up audit to determine change in practice. RESULTS: Improvements in practice were observed for all eight criteria. The most significant improvements were for the following criteria: an organizational policy exists for patient discharge after endoscopy, minimum discharge criteria are established, minimum discharge criteria are met before the patient is discharged (each from 0% to 100% compliance), patient received written and verbal discharge instructions (from 12% to 100% compliance), and discharge care plan is documented in the patient's medical file (from 0% to 88%). Criteria 4 (discharge is authorized by an appropriate staff member), 6 (staff member is appropriately trained and educated) and 7 (patient is accompanied by a responsible adult) achieved the least improvement in compliance rates, as baseline measures already showed a high degree of compliance. Overall, there was improvement in compliance for all best-practice recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The project demonstrated positive changes in the discharge care of sedated patients following endoscopic procedures in an endoscopy tertiary center in Shanghai, China. A formalized organizational discharge policy is currently in place and a continuous cycle of audit and re-audit will need to be carried out in the future to keep the quality at a high and steady level.

The ripple effect of evidence implementation: a descriptive evaluation of JBI's Evidence-based Clinical Fellowship Program.

BACKGROUND: Across healthcare there are acknowledged gaps in the translation of evidence into clinical practice. Undertaking a structured implementation program may assist clinicians to achieve this in their clinical practice setting. AIMS/METHODS: The current study descriptively evaluates and analyzes the impact of JBI's (formerly known as the Joanna Briggs Institute) Evidence-based Clinical Fellowship program, since its inception in 2005. RESULTS: Since its inception the JBI Evidence-based Clinical Fellowship Program has trained over 560 Clinical Fellows. The program consists of two 1-week intensive training workshops at JBI, collaborating with a JBI Research Fellow facilitator, with each participant then conducting a workplace evidence implementation project over the intervening 6 months in their own clinical setting. A 'train-the-trainer' program was established to provide accredited trainers to run the program through established JBI Collaborating Entities. CONCLUSION: Implementation of research evidence into the clinical setting is challenging for health professionals. A pragmatic approach adopted through the JBI Evidence-based Clinical Fellowship Program ensures that the Clinical Fellow remains central as the program leader, but has direction and support from their team of various stakeholders, and ongoing collaboration with a JBI facilitator. This ensures increased capacity for engagement and ongoing sustainability of future implementation programs.