Crossing lines: a multidisciplinary framework for assessing connectivity of hammerhead sharks across jurisdictional boundaries.

Conservation and management of migratory species can be complex and challenging. International agreements such as the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) provide policy frameworks, but assessments and management can be hampered by lack of data and tractable mechanisms to integrate disparate datasets. An assessment of scalloped (Sphyrna lewini) and great (Sphyrna mokarran) hammerhead population structure and connectivity across northern Australia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea (PNG) was conducted to inform management responses to CMS and Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species listings of these species. An Integrated Assessment Framework (IAF) was devised to systematically incorporate data across jurisdictions and create a regional synopsis, and amalgamated a suite of data from the Australasian region. Scalloped hammerhead populations are segregated by sex and size, with Australian populations dominated by juveniles and small adult males, while Indonesian and PNG populations included large adult females. The IAF process introduced genetic and tagging data to produce conceptual models of stock structure and movement. Several hypotheses were produced to explain stock structure and movement patterns, but more data are needed to identify the most likely hypothesis. This study demonstrates a process for assessing migratory species connectivity and highlights priority areas for hammerhead management and research.

Evaluation of a clinical screening instrument to identify states of thiamine deficiency in inpatients with severe alcohol dependence syndrome.

AIMS: To develop a Thiamine Deficiency Questionnaire (TDQ), and to assess its reliability in the identification of Thiamine deficiency, in patients with severe alcohol dependence. METHODS: 58 severely alcohol dependent patients underwent socio-demographic, medical, psychiatric, and alcohol use assessment, including administration of the Thiamine Deficiency Questionnaire (TDQ). The Red Blood Cell Thiamine Pyrophosphate concentration provided the 'gold standard' to test the validity of the instrument. Univariate 2 x 2 diagnostic test tables and multivariate analysis were performed. RESULTS: A set of eight questionnaire items had an overall predictive power of 73.7%. Two of these were highly specific: 'missed meals due to lack of funds', and the clinical co-occurrence of medical conditions potentially related to poor nutrition. The Michigan Alcohol Screening Test and serum gamma glutamyl transferase were moderately predictive. CONCLUSIONS: Screening that combines socio-demographic, clinical and biological factors, and/or standardized questionnaires, could improve early recognition of thiamine deficiency.

Waiting times from abnormal breast screen to diagnosis in 7 Canadian provinces.

BACKGROUND: Delay to breast cancer diagnosis following an abnormal screening result is associated with anxiety and personal disruption. We assessed the patterns and timeliness of diagnostic follow-up after breast cancer screening for women with abnormal results who attended organized screening programs in 7 provinces. METHODS: Using data from the Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Database, we identified 203,141 women aged 50-69 years who underwent screening in 1996 through provincially organized breast cancer screening programs in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. We prospectively followed women with an abnormal screening result through to the completion of the assessment process. We evaluated the waiting times from screening examination to first assessment, from screening examination to first imaging, from screening examination to diagnosis and from first assessment to diagnosis for 13,958 women, stratified according to screening program, mode of detection, whether a biopsy was performed and whether cancer was diagnosed. RESULTS: We observed considerable variations between and within programs in the time to diagnosis. The median time from screening examination to first assessment was 2.6 weeks. The median time from screening examination to diagnosis was 3.7 weeks; this time increased to 6.9 weeks for women undergoing biopsy. Even when no biopsy was performed, 10% of the women waited 9.6 weeks or longer for a diagnosis, as compared with 15.0 weeks or longer for 10% of the women undergoing biopsy. Among the women who had a biopsy, the use of core biopsy was associated with a shorter median time to diagnosis than was open biopsy, and those found to have cancer had shorter waiting times than women with benign biopsy findings. INTERPRETATION: Women undergoing assessment of an abnormal breast cancer screening result waited many weeks for a diagnosis, especially when a biopsy was performed. To ensure that targets for timeliness, adopted nationally in 1999, are realized, improved models of care or dissemination of existing efficient techniques to reach a diagnosis will be needed.

Requiring students to have computers: questions for consideration.

For the past several years a dialogue has been taking place in the offices, lounges, and meeting rooms of medical schools about whether medical students should be required to bring or purchase computers when they enter school. Microcomputers offer educators a unique opportunity to provide students with access to computer-assisted instruction, asynchronous communication, and extensive knowledge bases. However, there is still no evidence attesting to the effectiveness of computers as teaching or learning tools in medical education. The author raises questions that schools need to consider before requiring students to own computers: What kind of computer best suits their needs? What might impede using computers to teach? And who is currently requiring computers? In addressing the last question, the author presents information about 15 North American schools that currently require their students to have computers, reporting each school's software and hardware requirements; how each expects students to use the computers; and who covers the cost of the computers (the students or the school). Finally, he argues that major institutional commitment is needed for computers to be successfully integrated into any medical school curriculum.

Recruiting women for breast screening. Family Physician Model strategy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether family physicians would participate in the Family Physician Model (FPM) recruitment strategy for mammography screening, whether participating physicians differed from non-participating physicians, and whether the strategy would recruit 70% of eligible women in the participating practices. DESIGN: Family physicians were invited to participate in the project. Staff from the Ontario Breast Screening Program-Hamilton Centre (OBSP-H) identified eligible women, prepared personalized letters recommending screening, and monitored compliance. Participating and non-participating physicians were asked to complete a questionnaire. SETTING: Family practices in Dundas, Ancaster, and Hamilton, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 50 years and older who met eligibility criteria for screening. Family physicians in Dundas, Ancaster, and Hamilton. INTERVENTION: Family physicians were approached by the Health Promotion Officer at the OBSP-H about participating in the FPM. Eligible women in their practices were sent letters recommending breast screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of family physicians agreeing to participate in the FPM, characteristics of participating and non-participating physicians, and percentage of eligible women who scheduled mammograms. RESULTS: Of the 114 family physicians approached, 76 (67%) agreed to participate. Significantly more participating than non-participating physicians were in group practice and had certification in family medicine. In response to the letters, 54% of eligible women obtained mammograms. Because 12% of women were ineligible since they had been referred for screening within the previous 12 months, 66% of women in the participating practices actually obtained mammograms over the 2-year period-almost the target 70%. CONCLUSION: The FPM is a successful recruitment strategy.

Health problems in family practice. An Icelandic multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: To establish epidemiological data on the health problems within family practice in Iceland by multicentre analysis of well-defined geographic areas. DESIGN: Prospective practice audit. SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS: Thirteen Icelandic health centres (HC) with computerized contact data from 1 January - 31 December 1988. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health problems during one year in a population, as perceived by health care providers. RESULTS: A total of 176 384 health problems during one year in a population of 31 248, as perceived by the health care provider, were analysed. Musculoskeletal disorders accounted for 9.3% of all health problems (prevalence 210.6/1000 inhabitants), respiratory disorders 9.4% (189.9/1000), accidents 7.4% (203.2/1000), cardiovascular disorders 7.4% (112.0/1000) and mental disorders 6.1% (87.6/1000). The commonest single health problems were: hypertension, upper respiratory tract infections and non-articular rheumatism. The health problems accounting for the most frequent contacts were: mental disorders (4.0 contacts per individual per year), cardiovascular (3.7), and endocrine, nutrition and metabolic (3.2). CONCLUSION: Problem-oriented medical records from HCs, computerized in a uniform standardized way, can give extensive information about the content and burden of health problems in family practice and presumably public health. Our results are valuable because the population (the denominator) and the geographic study area are well defined. This information is an important part of clinical epidemiology and can be of great value for educators and health care planners.

Diagnostic reasoning of high- and low-domain-knowledge clinicians: a reanalysis.

Thinking-aloud protocols provided by Joseph and Patel were reanalyzed to determine the extent to which their conclusions could be replicated by independently developed coding schemes. The data set consisted of protocols from four cardiologists (low domain knowledge = LDK) and four endocrinologists (high domain knowledge = HDK), individually working on a diagnostic problem in endocrinology. The two analyses agree that the HDK physicians related data to potential diagnoses more than did the LDK group and were more focused on the correct diagnostic components. However, the reanalysis found no meaningful difference between the groups in diagnostic accuracy, speed of diagnosis, or the breadth of the search space used to seek a solution. In the reanalysis, the HDK physicians employed more single-cue inference and less multiple-cue inference. The generalizability of results of protocol-analysis studies can be assessed by using several complementary coding schemes.

On content of practice. An Icelandic multicentre study, population, practices and contacts.

To establish data on the content of Icelandic family practice, a prospective practice audit was made of all Icelandic health centres with computerized contact data from 1 January to 31 December 1988. The study comprised 17 community health centres in Iceland and their target populations, 13 rural and four urban. The main subjects for study were population characteristics, practice sizes, types of health care providers, and contacts. The study population, 50,865 subjects, comprised 20.2% of the Icelandic population. Rural and urban populations were different and are described separately. The 17 health centres had a mean of 1,152 subjects/doctor. The target population had a total of 257,188 contacts: 155,526 rural contacts, 5.1/subject (3.3 office-, 1.1 phone-, and 0.4 home-contacts); 101662 urban contacts, 5.1/subjects (2.8 office-, 1.6 phone-, and 0.4 home-contacts). During 1988, 88.9% of the rural target population made contact. These data are comparable to data from other countries; the observed office and home contact rates were similar, but phone-calls were more frequent. Computer systems in family practice provide a feasible way to collect data on a regular basis for epidemiological purposes and for performance review.

Reasons for contact in family practice. An Icelandic multicentre study on content of practice.

To establish data on the patient's reasons for a contact, as a part of data on content of Icelandic family practice, a prospective practice audit was made of 16 Icelandic health centres with computerized contact data from 1 January to 31 December 1988. The study comprised 16 community health centres in Iceland and their target population, 12 rural and four urban. The reasons for contact in the study group are analysed. A total of 284348 reasons for contact were analysed; 36-39% were for symptoms and 44-50% were initiated by health professionals. The latter included renewal of prescriptions, which comprised 17-18% of all reasons for contact. Musculoskeletal symptoms were the most common symptomatic complaint, 6.6-7.3% of all reasons for contact. The five most often stated symptoms were: rash, cough, cold, lower limb symptoms, and fever. A "reason for contact" record increases the understanding of the patient's presenting complaint, as well as the patient's agenda in each contact. This record gives an opportunity to follow the presenting complaint in the continuous process of care i. e. reason for contact diagnosis, management, and follow-up. We are reminded that common things are common in family practice; nevertheless more research is needed to understand the process of care.

Five-year results of the peer assessment program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

The office practices of 918 physicians selected through stratified random sampling from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) registry were assessed by peers and the Peer Assessment Committee of the CPSO from 1981 to 1985. The sample comprised 662 general practitioners (GPs) and family physicians (FPs) and 256 specialists in 11 fields. Of the physicians 749 (82%) had neither deficient records nor an unsatisfactory level of patient care. Of the GPs and FPs 97 (15%) had serious deficiencies in one or both areas, as compared with 4 (2%) of the specialists (p2 less than 0.00001). The proportions of certificants of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada and of the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) with serious deficiencies were low (2% and 3% respectively). Three statistically significant predictors of physician performance were found among the GPs and FPs: age, CFPC membership status and type of practice. Of the 56 physicians who were reassessed 6 to 12 months later 29 (52%) had made the improvements recommended by the committee. Our findings demonstrate the need, feasibility and acceptance of a peer assessment program of office practices in Ontario.