The value of transcranial Doppler in predicting cerebral ischaemia during carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: transcranial Doppler (TCD) measurement of middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAV) is an indirect method of assessing cerebral blood flow and therefore predicting patients at risk of stroke during carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and may be used to determine the need for shunting. This study evaluates the accuracy of three accepted TCD criteria in predicting the need for a shunt. DESIGN: prospective study. METHODS: one hundred and twenty consecutive CEA were performed under loco/regional anaesthesia. Patients monitored by TCD and Awake neurological examination were included. Shunts were inserted if there was neurological deterioration. Awake patient monitoring was compared with the three TCD criteria. RESULTS: inadequate TCD recordings were obtained in 16 operations (13%). In the remainder (104 cases), 12 developed symptoms of cerebral ischaemia and required a shunt (12%). Comparisons with the three accepted criteria were as follows: (1) m MCAV <30 cm/s had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 92%, 49%, 19%, and 98%, respectively; (2) clamp/pre-clamp ratio <0.6 had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 92%, 75%, 33% and 99%, respectively; (3) greater than 50% reduction in m MCAV had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV valves of 83%, 77%, 32% and 97%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TCD flow velocities are not a reliable method for detecting cerebral ischaemia and therefore determining the need for a shunt in CEA.

Efficacy of furosemide in the treatment of exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage in Thoroughbred racehorses.

The repeatability of endoscopic observations of exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage (EIPH) and the efficacy of furosemide as a prophylactic treatment of horses with EIPH were studied in Thoroughbred race horses after consecutive breezes (at or near maximum speed, approx 16 m/s). Of 56 horses examined greater than or equal to 2 times, 21 (38%) had identical EIPH scores, whereas 26 (46%) and 9 (16%) had scores that differed by greater than or equal to 1 grade. In 56 nontreated horses, there was good agreement between 2 consecutive observations (K = 0.59, Z = 4.54, P less than 0.001). Similar comparisons after placebo (saline solution) treatment of 21 horses yielded fair to good agreement, whereas poorer agreement was seen after furosemide treatment of 23 horses. Comparison of average and maximum EIPH scores of 44 horses with a minimum of 4 observations (2 nontreated, 1 saline-treated, and 1 furosemide-treated) indicated that although furosemide did not stop EIPH, it did reduce the EIPH score in 28 (64%) horses.