Achieving glycemic goal with initial versus sequential combination therapy using metformin and pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare glycemic goal achievement (HbA(1c) < 7%) in type 2 diabetes patients receiving initial metformin plus pioglitazone combination therapy and initial metformin monotherapy augmented with pioglitazone in a cohort follow-up study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Adult patients were identified from the Ingenix Impact database (01/01/99-03/31/07). Qualified patients had a baseline HbA(1c) ≥ 7%; a second laboratory value within 9 months; no other anti-diabetic prescriptions 6 months before or 30 days after treatment initiation; and continuous enrollment during baseline. The index date was the date on which the second medication was initiated. Goal achievement was compared independently at 6, 12 and 18 months using a chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to control for baseline differences. Last observation carried forward was used to impute missing HbA(1c) values. Sub-group analysis was conducted on patients with baseline HbA(1c) values between 7% and 9%, and >9%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of patients achieving glycemic goal at each specified time point. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients received initial combination therapy and 347 patients received sequential therapy. A greater proportion of initial combination patients achieved the glycemic goal compared to sequential patients at months 6, 12 and 18 (66.5 vs. 49.6%; 65.9 vs. 48.1%; 65.9 vs. 48.4%, respectively; p < 0.001 for all). Logistic regression confirmed these findings (odds ratios [OR]: 3.18-3.31). Sub-group analysis showed a more pronounced advantage for aggressive initial combination treatment among patients with HbA(1c) > 9% (OR: 5.39-6.04) than among patients with HbA(1c) between 7% and 9% (OR: 2.28-2.79). CONCLUSIONS: Initial combination therapy patients are more likely to achieve glycemic control than sequential therapy patients, especially for patients with baseline HbA(1c) > 9%. This study is limited by the relatively small sample size and the frequency of HbA(1c) reporting. Future research could examine goal achievement using a larger sample and more complete laboratory data to confirm these findings.

Alogliptin use in elderly people: a pooled analysis from phase 2 and 3 studies.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of alogliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) enzyme inhibitor, in elderly (> or =65) and younger (<65) patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Pooled analysis of six randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of alogliptin. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 18 to 80 with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycemic control. INTERVENTIONS: Elderly (mean age 70.0; n=455) and younger (mean age 51.8; n=1,911) patients received alogliptin 12.5 mg (n=922), alogliptin 25 mg (n=910), or placebo (n=534) for 26 weeks (12 weeks in a Phase 2 study). The studies evaluated alogliptin as monotherapy and coadministered with pioglitazone, glyburide, metformin, or insulin. MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), weight, and lipid values. Safety variables included hypoglycemic events, adverse events, and blood pressure. RESULTS: Least-squares mean HbA1c decreased from baseline by 0.7% and 0.8% in elderly patients receiving alogliptin 12.5 and 25 mg, respectively, and 0.5% and 0.6%, respectively, in younger patients (P<.001 for both alogliptin doses vs placebo for both age groups P=.70 for 12.5 mg and .68 for 25 mg for differences between age groups). Results were similar for FPG. Incidence of hypoglycemia was 8.3% or less in all alogliptin groups (< or =10.5% for placebo), with no apparent difference between elderly and younger patients. Changes in weight were negligible in all treatment groups in both age categories. The safety profiles of alogliptin were similar in the age and dose groups. CONCLUSION: Alogliptin was effective and well tolerated in the elderly patients enrolled in these studies. Improvements in HbA1c were similar to those seen in younger patients, and no increase in the risk of hypoglycemia, weight gain, or other adverse events was apparent in elderly patients.