Localization of a time-delayed, monocular virtual object superimposed on a real environment.

Observers adjusted a pointer to match the depicted distance of a monocular virtual object viewed in a see-through, head-mounted display. Distance information was available through motion parallax produced as the observers rocked side to side. The apparent stability of the virtual object was impaired by a time delay between the observers' head motions and the corresponding change in the object position on the display. Localizations were made for four time delays (31 ms, 64 ms, 131 ms, and 197 ms) and three depicted distances (75 cm, 95 cm, and 113 cm). The errors in localizations increased systematically with time delay and depicted distance. A model of the results shows that the judgment error and lateral projected position of the virtual object are each linearly related to time delay.

Context-specific adaptation of vertical vergence to correlates of eye position.

Vertical phoria (vertical vergence in the absence of binocular feedback) can be trained to vary with non-visual cues such as vertical conjugate eye position, horizontal conjugate eye position and horizontal vergence. These prior studies demonstrated a low-level association or coupling between vertical vergence and several oculomotor cues. As a test of the potential independence of multiple eye-position cues for vertical vergence, context-specific adaptation experiments were conducted in three orthogonal adapting planes (midsagittal, frontoparallel, and transverse). Four vertical disparities in each of these planes were associated with various combinations of two specific components of eye position. Vertical disparities in the plane were associated with horizontal vergence and vertical conjugate eye position; vertical disparities in the frontoparallel plane were associated with horizontal and vertical conjugate eye position; and vertical disparities in the transverse plane were associated with horizontal vergence and horizontal conjugate eye position. The results demonstrate that vertical vergence can be adapted to respond to specific combinations of two different sources of eye-position information. The results are modeled with an association matrix whose inputs are two classes of eye position and whose weighted output is vertical vergence.

A cross-coupling model of vertical vergence adaptation.

Vertical disparity vergence aligns the two eyes in response to vertical misalignment (disparity) of the two ocular images. An adaptive response to vertical disparity vergence is demonstrated by the continuation of vertical vergence when one eye is occluded. The adaptive response is quantified by vertical phoria, the eye alignment error during monocular viewing. Vertical phoria can be differentially adapted to vertical disparities of opposite sign located at two positions along the horizontal or vertical head-referenced axes. Vertical phoria aftereffects vary in amplitude as the eyes move from one adapted direction of gaze to another along the adaptation axis. A cross-coupling model was developed to account for the spatial variations of vertical phoria aftereffects. The model is constrained according to both single cell recordings of eye position sensitive neurons, and eye position measurements during and following adaptation. The vertical phoria is computed by scaling the activities of eye position sensitive neurons and converting the scaled activities into a vertical vergence signal. The three components of the model are: neural activities associated with conjugate eye position, cross-coupling weights to scale the activities, and vertical vergence transducers to convert the weighted activities to vertical vergence. The model provides a biologically plausible mechanism for vertical vergence adaptation.

An adaptable association between vertical and horizontal vergence.

Vertical phoria (vergence error under monocular viewing conditions) can be trained to vary with conjugate eye position. The adaptive response controls the vertical alignment of the two eyes in the absence of binocular disparity and is used to compensate for binocular changes of the oculomotor system induced by developmental and environmental factors. Vertical phoria was associated with horizontal disparity vergence by adapting vertical vergence to two vertically disparate targets separated along the depth axis. This association was primarily dependent on the horizontal vergence as opposed to monocular eye position or binocular conjugate eye position. Following this adapted association with horizontal disparity vergence, vertical phoria aftereffects were also evoked by accommodative vergence. Previous reports have demonstrated an adapted association between vertical phoria and conjugate eye position. The current report examines the difference in the vertical phoria resulting from adaptation to vertically disparate targets separated along either the vertical axis or depth axis. The amplitude of the vertical vergence aftereffect was approximately 4 times greater for targets separated along the depth axis than in the vertical meridian. The association between vertical phoria with conjugate eye position and horizontal vergence is proposed to result from a cross-coupling of vertical vergence with supranuclear regions that control conjugate and horizontal vergence eye movements. A selective interaction would enable the oculomotor system to correct disturbances in specific supranuclear regions as they interface with vertical vergence.

Distance cues for vertical vergence adaptation.

Vertical vergence can be trained to respond to vertical and/or horizontal conjugate eye position, horizontal vergence, and vertical head tilt. This cross-coupling is manifest as a vertical phoria aftereffect (monocular vertical vergence response) that varies with direction and distance of gaze. The function of the spatially dependent adaptation is to maintain the calibration between vertical eye alignment and intended placement of the two retinal images. Oculomotor adaptation stabilizes our sense of spatial localization and calibrates a body-referenced coordinate representation of visual space that is necessary for visually guided motor responses. We have tested the possible association of vertical phoria adaptation with perceptual cues to distance in the absence of any other associated motor activity. During adaptive training, vertical disparity vergence was associated with variations of perceptual distance cues (including loom, overlap, relative size, and relative motion), oculomotor distance cues (horizontal vergence), or a combination of both classes of cues. We observed that in a 2-h period the open-loop (monocular) vertical vergence response could not be trained to occur as an aftereffect in association with the perceptual cues to distance, whereas it could be trained in association with oculomotor cues. We conclude that the spatial specificity of vertical vergence aftereffects caused by short-term adaptation results from an associated cross-coupling with supranuclear sources of oculomotor activity.

Product review: the Coreco Oculus-500 imaging system.

Recent developments in computer imaging technology have brought about significant improvements in the display resolution and capabilities of desk-top imaging systems. The Coreco, Inc. Oculus-500 is a group of high resolution imaging boards for use with IBM-AT and compatible computers. The tested $8000 system consists of a 2 Mb interface board, display/controller board, driver, toolkit, and software interface package. With a display resolution of 1280 x 1024 @ 60 Hz non-interlaced, the OC-500 offers excellent resolution. The accompanying software is being further developed by a responsive company, but can in places be tedious to use. However, the result of understanding the software is a system with superb capabilities.