Evaluation of US Medical Student Bias Toward Mental Health Before and After First-Year Pre-clinical Psychiatry Education.

OBJECTIVE: Much of mental health care is provided by non-psychiatric providers, and unfortunately, bias toward patients with mental health conditions leads to worsened outcomes. The authors endeavored to determine if pre-clinical medical student psychiatry education had an impact on these perceptions. METHODS: All 366 first-year medical students at Indiana University were invited to participate in a survey that consisted of the Mental Illness: Clinician's Attitudes version 2 (MICA-2) and six supplemental questions, pre- and post-course. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen students completed both surveys. The pre- and post-course means were 36.6 and 33.6, a change of - 2.9 (paired t-test p-value < 0.001), indicating a reduction in bias. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that pre-clinical education can lead to a measurable decrease in bias in medical students early in training. Unfortunately, individual question results and free responses continue to highlight significant bias in US medical students against mental illness and the field of psychiatry. Health care educators should be aware of these biases and their potential impact on patient outcomes so that these harmful perceptions can be targeted.

Reducing oral steroid intolerability and drug costs for acute wheezers: A retrospective evaluation of a clinical management algorithm in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

PROJECT AIM: To retrospectively evaluate a clinical management algorithm for acute wheezers in a UK Pediatric Emergency Department (PED). OVERVIEW AND RATIONALE: Acute wheezing attacks are a leading cause of PED attendances and inpatient admissions. Prednisolone, a routine treatment, is intolerable in almost one-third of children, requiring repeated dosing, which may prolong length of stay (LOS). To address this problem, we: (1) developed an acute management algorithm (concise, single-sided flow-chart, instructing immediate management); (2) modified the OCS regime from prednisolone (1 mg/kg, 3-day course) to dexamethasone (600 then 300 mcg/kg); (3) and disseminated guidance regionally. Written information-handouts, e-mails, and posters-were followed-up with verbal reinforcement. We implemented the algorithm in 2017 and revised it further in 2018. EVALUATION: In 2019, we retrospectively collected data on 100 acute wheeze attendances (those requiring OCS, aged 2-14), between October and December in 2016, 2017, and 2018 (n = 300), and assessed outcomes. RESULTS: Over a 48-month period, we reduced OCS intolerability by 67.2% and OCS drug costs by 85.8% (saving £41,470.14), while not significantly influencing the other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced intolerability and substantial cost savings can be achieved by implementing a structured acute pediatric wheeze algorithm and modifying the OCS to single-dose dexamethasone (300 mcg/kg).

Intubation drug pack containing pre-filled syringes reduces the time to endotracheal intubation in a simulated paediatric emergency.

To determine if an intubation drugs pack containing pre-filled syringes can reduce the time to endotracheal intubation compared with standard care during a simulated paediatric emergency. Twenty doctors (10 consultants and 10 registrars) who worked in the paediatric intensive care unit or anaesthetic department of a tertiary paediatric hospital were asked to participate in an in situ simulated emergency paediatric intubation scenario. The participants were instructed to prepare and administer intubation medications. They were randomised to either an intubation drug pack, containing pre-filled syringes or to standard care where each of the drugs had to be individually drawn-up. The mean time to intubation when using the pre-filled syringes of 159.5 s was over three times faster than with standard care of 497.5 s (p<0.001), allowing intubation to occur on average 5 min and 38 s earlier. Utilising an intubation drug pack containing pre-filled syringes significantly reduced the time from decision to intubate to intubation in a simulated paediatric emergency. This applied irrespective of clinical experience with registrars utilising the pre-filled syringes outperforming consultant anaesthetists when they used standard care.

Applying the multi-threat framework of stereotype threat in the context of digital gaming.

Females often report experiencing stigmatisation pertaining to their competency in digital gaming communities. Employing the principles of the multi-threat framework of stereotype threat, the current research examined the impact of gender-related stereotypes on females' gaming performance and related self-perceptions. In Experiment 1, 90 females were assigned to one of three conditions in which they were primed that their performance would be either diagnostic of their personal (self-as-target) or gender group's ability (group-as-target) or would be non-diagnostic of gaming ability (control). In Experiment 2, 90 females were primed that their performance would be judged by a group of other females (in-group source) or males (out-group source), or would be non-diagnostic of ability (control). Participants then completed a casual gaming task, as well as measures of competence beliefs, self-efficacy and self-esteem. Findings from Experiment 1 indicate that neither a self-as-target nor a group-as-target stereotype affected significantly gaming performance, or game-related self-efficacy, self-esteem and competency beliefs. Findings from Experiment 2 reveal further that females' gaming performance and associated self-perceptions were not impacted significantly by an in-group or out-group source of stereotype threat. The discussion turns to potential explanations for these findings, proposing that females may not perceive negative gender-gaming stereotypes to be an accurate representation of their personal or social group's gaming ability. We also discuss the implications of the experimental design and difficulty, as well as the potential for domain identification to moderate performance outcomes under stereotype threat.

Comparison of two methods for measurement of equine insulin.

Diagnosis of equine hyperinsulinemia requires an accurate method for quantification of equine insulin concentrations. The objectives of the current study were to compare 2 commercially available techniques for measurement of equine insulin, the radioimmunoassay (RIA) and chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA). Recovery was poor for both assays, but worse for the CIA. Serial dilution of a high endogenous insulin sample yielded better linearity for the RIA ( r2 = 0.99, P < 0.001) than the CIA ( r2 = 0.92, P = 0.009). Bland-Altman analysis indicated that the CIA was, on average, 91 pmol/l higher than the RIA, with wide limits of agreement (95% limits of agreement: -508 to 691 pmol/l). These findings suggest that results between the assays should not be considered interchangeable.