Performing Multiple Posterior Spinal Fusions in 1 Day: A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Morning and Afternoon Cases.

BACKGROUND: High-volume centers for idiopathic scoliosis (IS) have difficulty in scheduling posterior spinal fusions (PSFs) due to operating room availability, particularly during school vacation. A solution is for 1 surgeon to perform 2 PSF cases back-to-back. This study aims to compare morning and afternoon PSF cases performed by the same surgeon for perioperative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of PSF cases for IS that occurred on the same day as another PSF by the same surgeon between January 2013 and December 2019 was conducted. Perioperative outcomes included surgical time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and inpatient opioid consumption normalized by the patient's weight. Postoperative outcomes included complications, revision rate, curve correction, and patient-reported outcomes using the Scoliosis Research Society-30. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients (87% female), mean age 15.6 years, were analyzed, with 48 morning cases and 47 afternoon cases. The median follow-up was 1.9 years (range: 0.3 to 6.1 y). Tests for equivalency determined equivalence in median anesthesia and mean surgical duration (P=0.05). The groups had similar initial curve correction (P=0.43) and rate of complications at 90 days postoperative (2 in each group for a total of 4 complications). No significant differences were seen between Scoliosis Research Society-30 scores at 6 months or in those who have reached 2 years postoperative. CONCLUSIONS: Little literature exists on the safety of a surgeon performing 2 PSF cases in 1 day, particularly in regard to pain outcomes, 30- and 90-day complication rates, and quality of life measures. This study indicates that few differences in safety, pain, and quality of life outcomes may appear between morning and afternoon PSF cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Tranexamic Acid Is Efficacious at Decreasing the Rate of Blood Loss in Adolescent Scoliosis Surgery: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic drug that reduces surgical blood loss. Evidence supporting its efficacy in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is not robust. This trial was designed to validate the clinical efficacy of TXA in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved prospective double-blinded trial involved 111 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who were randomized to receive either a placebo or TXA (50-mg/kg loading dose and 10-mg/kg/h infusion). Power analysis indicated that 50 patients per group would provide power to detect a >20% difference in blood loss. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to compare blood loss rates (slopes) using the group-by-time interaction F test. RESULTS: The risk of clinically relevant blood loss (>20 mL/kg) was more than twice as high in the placebo group than in the TXA group (44% versus 21%, relative risk = 2.1, 95% confidence interval = 1.2 to 3.7). Compared with the placebo group, the TXA group had a 27% reduction in intraoperative blood loss, a significantly lower rate of intraoperative bleeding per hour (mean and standard deviation, 190 ± 73 versus 230 ± 80 mL, p = 0.01; F = 9.77, p < 0.001) and per fused spinal level (82 ± 32 versus 110 ± 40 mL, p < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (836 ± 373 versus 1,031 ± 484 mL, p = 0.02), and less postoperative bleeding (in the drain) (498 ± 228 versus 645 ± 318 mL, p = 0.009). Six patients who received a placebo and no patient who received TXA required an allogenic blood transfusion. No perioperative adverse events, including thromboembolic events or seizures, were observed. Three independent factors were predictive of blood loss: TXA administration, duration of surgery, and number of levels fused. Greater intraoperative blood loss was the only independent variable predictive of a longer hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Use of TXA in patients undergoing surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis significantly reduced blood loss, by 27%, compared with that in the placebo group. The rate of intraoperative blood loss per hour and per level fused and the amount of postoperative blood loss were significantly lower in the TXA group. More placebo-treated patients received allogenic blood. Patients with greater intraoperative blood loss spent a longer time in the hospital. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anesthesia and the developing brain: A way forward for laboratory and clinical research.

All commonly used general anesthetics have been shown to cause neurotoxicity in animal models, including nonhuman primates. Opinion, however, remains divided over how cumulative evidence from preclinical and human studies in this field should be interpreted and its translation to current practices in pediatric anesthesia and surgery. A group of international experts in laboratory and clinical sciences recently convened in Genoa, Italy, to evaluate the current state of both laboratory and clinical research and discuss future directions for basic, translational, and clinical studies in this field. This paper describes those discussions and conclusions. A central goal identified was the importance of continuing to pursue laboratory research efforts to better understand the biological pathways underlying anesthesia neurotoxicity. The distinction between basic and translational experimental designs in this field was highlighted, and it was acknowledged that it will be important for future animal research to try to causally link structural changes with long-term cognitive abnormalities. While inherent limitations will continue to affect the ability of even large observational cohorts to determine if anesthesia impacts neurodevelopment or behavioral outcomes, the importance of conducting further large well-designed cohort studies was also emphasized. Adequately powered cohorts could clarify which populations are at increased risk, provide information on environmental and healthcare-related risk modifiers, and guide future interventional trials. If anesthetics cause structural or functional adverse neurological effects in young children, alternative or mitigating strategies need to be considered. While protective or mitigating strategies have been repeatedly studied in animals, there are currently no human data to support alternative anesthetic strategies in clinical practice. Lastly, it was noted that there is still considerable debate over the clinical relevance of anesthesia neurotoxicity, and the need to evaluate the impact of other aspects of perioperative care on neurodevelopment must also be considered.

Perioperative factors influencing neurocognitive outcomes in infants.

Neonates have a higher perioperative mortality risk largely due to the premorbid state of the infants and the complex nature of many of the surgeries. Another contributing factor is the rapidly changing physiology of neonates especially during the first 3 days of life. The perioperative management of these critically ill neonates may affect their cerebral perfusion and ultimately neurocognitive outcomes. This article discusses perioperative techniques to maximize cerebral perfusion.

A comparison of radial artery blood pressure determination between the Vasotrac device and invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in adolescents undergoing scoliosis surgery.

UNLABELLED: The Vasotrac device (Medwave, Arden Hills, MN) allows noninvasive measurement of arterial blood pressure (BP) and arterial waveform. We have previously demonstrated agreement between the Vasotrac and continuous intraarterial BP monitoring in children with a stable circulation after cardiac surgery in the cardiac intensive care unit. To assess this monitor during different physiologic conditions, we studied the Vasotrac in anesthetized adolescent children undergoing scoliosis surgery in the prone position, with or without controlled hypotension. Eleven children undergoing surgery for idiopathic scoliosis were enrolled in this study. The anesthetic consisted of primarily a nitrous oxide and narcotic technique with controlled hypotension obtained using IV labetalol. Data were analyzed using correlations, mean error, and Bland-Altman plots. Noninvasive BP measured by the Vasotrac correlated closely with intraarterial BP. Waveforms displayed by the two systems were qualitatively similar. Correlation between the two methods for systolic, diastolic and mean BP was r = 0.82, r = 0.83, and r = 0.90, respectively. We conclude that noninvasive BP measurement using the Vasotrac monitor enables near-continuous and reliable monitoring of BP during anesthesia in the prone position and pharmacologic-induced hypotension. IMPLICATIONS: The Vasotrac, a noninvasive arterial blood pressure monitor, performs well in the prone position in adolescent patients undergoing scoliosis surgery using a technique of mild-to-moderate induced hypotension.