Endocarditis and the impact of intravenous drug use: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: This cohort study is a comparison of infective endocarditis in intravenous drug users (IDUs) and non-IDUs within a single tertiary centre. We aim to quantify and describe the factors that influence prognosis and microbiological characteristics. METHOD: All consecutive admissions to a tertiary referral hospital in the north of England with a diagnosis of endocarditis from April 2013 to January 2020 were identified. Outcomes were all-cause mortality at 30 days, 12 months and 3 years, length of stay and progression to surgery. RESULTS: A total of 303 cases were identified via clinical coding of which 287 cases of endocarditis were confirmed. First episode endocarditis was then confirmed in 263 episodes, 44 in IDUs and 219 in non-IDUs. Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most common organism seen overall, significantly more so in IDU than non-IDU cases (29/44 [65.9%] vs. 51/219 [23.3%], p < .001). Overall progression to valve surgery was similar between the two groups (92/219 [42.0%] vs. 19/44[43.2%], p = .886). In IDUs 30-d survival was 93% (80-98) and 3-year survival 47% (30-63%). In non-IDU 30-d survival was 88% (83-92%) and 60% (53-67%) at 3 years. Of the 19 IDUs who underwent valve surgery 7 (37%) survived to study completion without reinfection and 8 (42%) died following recurrent endocarditis. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that prognosis in IDUs is worse than previously described, particularly in those undergoing valve surgery. This is despite comparable receipt of inpatient treatment to non-IDUs as demonstrated by equal length of stay and rates of surgery. Clinicians should consider the role of addictions services on discharge to break the cycle of reinfection.

Pyogenic brain abscess and subdural empyema: presentation, management, and factors predicting outcome.

PURPOSE: To describe the presentation and management of bacterial brain abscess and subdural empyema in adults treated at two tertiary centers. In addition, to identify factors that may predict a poor clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data obtained from clinical records was performed, followed by multivariate regression analysis of patient and treatment-related factors. RESULTS: 113 patients were included with a median age of 53 years and a male preponderance. At presentation symptoms were variable, 28% had a focal neurological deficit, and 39% had a reduced Glasgow coma scale (GCS). Brain abscesses most frequently affected the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes while 36% had a subdural empyema. An underlying cause was identified in 76%; a contiguous ear or sinus infection (43%), recent surgery or trauma (18%) and haematogenous spread (15%). A microbiological diagnosis was confirmed in 86%, with streptococci, staphylococci, and anaerobes most frequently isolated. Treatment involved complex, prolonged antibiotic therapy (> 6 weeks in 84%) combined with neurosurgical drainage (91%) and source control surgery (34%). Mortality was 5% with 31% suffering long-term disability and 64% achieving a good clinical outcome. A reduced GCS, focal neurological deficit, and seizures at presentation were independently associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome (death or disability). CONCLUSIONS: Complex surgical and antimicrobial treatment achieves a good outcome in the majority of patients with bacterial brain abscess and subdural empyema. Factors present at diagnosis can help to predict those likely to suffer adverse outcomes. Research to determine optimal surgical and antibiotic management would be valuable.

Efavirenz induced acute liver failure requiring liver transplantation in a slow drug metaboliser.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy has revolutionised HIV management. However, many of these drugs are potentially hepatotoxic. Here, we report the first adult case of efavirenz induced acute liver failure successfully treated by liver transplantation. Furthermore, genetic analysis revealed our patient to be a slow efavirenz metaboliser, contributing to the severity of clinical presentation.

The cost-effectiveness of early access to HIV services and starting cART in the UK 1996-2008.

AIM: To calculate use, cost and cost-effectiveness of people living with HIV (PLHIV) starting routine treatment and care before starting combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and PLHIV starting first-line 2NRTIs+NNRTI or 2NRTIs+PI(boosted), comparing PLHIV with CD4≤200 cells/mm3 and CD4>200 cells/mm3. Few studies have calculated the use, cost and cost-effectiveness of routine treatment and care before starting cART and starting cART above and below CD4 200 cells/mm3. METHODS: Use, costs and cost-effectiveness were calculated for PLHIV in routine pre-cART and starting first-line cART, comparing CD4≤200 cells/mm3 with CD4>200 cells/mm3 (2008 UK prices). RESULTS: cART naïve patients CD4≤200 cells/mm3 had an annual cost of £6,407 (95%CI £6,382 to £6,425) PPY compared with £2,758 (95%CI £2,752 to £2,761) PPY for those with CD4>200 cells/mm3; cost per life year gained of pre-cART treatment and care for those with CD4>200 cells/mm3 was £1,776 (cost-saving to £2,752). Annual cost for starting 2NRTIs+NNRTI or 2NRTIs+PI(boosted) with CD4≤200 cells/mm3 was £12,812 (95%CI £12,685-£12,937) compared with £10,478 (95%CI £10,376-£10,581) for PLHIV with CD4>200 cells/mm3. Cost per additional life-year gained on first-line therapy for those with CD4>200 cells/mm3 was £4639 (£3,967 to £2,960). CONCLUSION: PLHIV starting to use HIV services before CD4≤200 cells/mm3 is cost-effective and enables them to be monitored so they start cART with a CD4>200 cells/mm3, which results in better outcomes and is cost-effective. However, 25% of PLHIV accessing services continue to present with CD4≤200 cells/mm3. This highlights the need to investigate the cost-effectiveness of testing and early treatment programs for key populations in the UK.

Cost-effectiveness of early treatment with first-line NNRTI-based HAART regimens in the UK, 1996-2006.

AIM: Calculate time to first-line treatment failure, annual cost and cost-effectiveness of NNRTI versus PIboosted first-line HAART regimens in the UK, 1996-2006. BACKGROUND: Population costs for HIV services are increasing in the UK and interventions need to be effective and efficient to reduce or stabilize costs. 2NRTIs + NNRTI regimens are cost-effective regimens for first-line HAART, but these regimens have not been compared with first-line PI(boosted) regimens. METHODS: Times to first-line treatment failure and annual costs were calculated for first-line HAART regimens by CD4 count when starting HAART (2006 UK prices). Cost-effectiveness of 2NRTIs+NNRTI versus 2NRTIs+PI(boosted) regimens was calculated for four CD4 strata. RESULTS: 55% of 5,541 people living with HIV (PLHIV) started HAART with CD4 count ≤ 200 cells/mm3, many of whom were Black Africans. Annual treatment cost decreased as CD4 count increased; most marked differences were observed between starting HAART with CD4 ≤ 200 cells/mm3 compared with CD4 count >200 cells/mm3. 2NRTI+PI(boosted) and 2NRTI+NNRTI regimens were the most effective regimens across the four CD4 strata; 2NRTI + NNRTI was cost-saving or cost-effective compared with 2NRTI + PI(boosted) regimens. CONCLUSION: To ensure more effective and efficient provision of HIV services, 2NRTI+NNRTI should be started as first-line HAART regimen at CD4 counts ≤ 350 cell/mm3, unless specific contra-indications exist. This will increase the number of PLHIV receiving HAART and will initially increase population costs of providing HIV services. However, starting PLHIV earlier on cost-effective regimens will maintain them in better health and use fewer health or social services, thereby generating fewer treatment and care costs, enabling them to remain socially and economically active members of society. This does raise a number of ethical issues, which will have to be acknowledged and addressed, especially in countries with limited resources.

Rising population cost for treating people living with HIV in the UK, 1997-2013.

BACKGROUND: The number of people living with HIV (PLHIV) is increasing in the UK. This study estimated the annual population cost of providing HIV services in the UK, 1997-2006 and projected them 2007-2013. METHODS: Annual cost of HIV treatment for PLHIV by stage of HIV infection and type of ART was calculated (UK pounds, 2006 prices). Population costs were derived by multiplying the number of PLHIV by their annual cost for 1997-2006 and projected 2007-2013. RESULTS: Average annual treatment costs across all stages of HIV infection ranged from £17,034 in 1997 to £18,087 in 2006 for PLHIV on mono-therapy and from £27,649 in 1997 to £32,322 in 2006 for those on quadruple-or-more ART. The number of PLHIV using NHS services rose from 16,075 to 52,083 in 2006 and was projected to increase to 78,370 by 2013. Annual population cost rose from £104 million in 1997 to £483 million in 2006, with a projected annual cost between £721 and £758 million by 2013. When including community care costs, costs increased from £164 million in 1997, to £683 million in 2006 and between £1,019 and £1,065 million in 2013. CONCLUSIONS: Increased number of PLHIV using NHS services resulted in rising UK population costs. Population costs are expected to continue to increase, partly due to PLHIV's longer survival on ART and the relative lack of success of HIV preventing programs. Where possible, the cost of HIV treatment and care needs to be reduced without reducing the quality of services, and prevention programs need to become more effective. While high income countries are struggling to meet these increasing costs, middle- and lower-income countries with larger epidemics are likely to find it even more difficult to meet these increasing demands, given that they have fewer resources.

Time to hand over our old way of working?

The European Working Time Directive and the change to shift working have highlighted the need for a high level of continuity of patient care. Continuity of information, through a competent and professional handover allows doctors to be not only made aware of the issues important to each patient's care, but also allows a knowledge-based approach to that patient's management.