RESUMO
BACKGROUND: As part of the 2018 Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG): A Core Set of Outcome Measures for Adults with Neurologic Conditions Undergoing Rehabilitation, a Knowledge Translation (KT) Task Force was convened. The purpose of this short report was to (1) demonstrate the potential impact of a CPG KT Task Force through a practical example of efforts to implement a CPG into neurologic physical therapy practice and (2) describe the process to convene a KT Task Force and develop products (KT Toolkit) to facilitate implementation of the CPG. METHODS: To describe the process used by the KT Task Force to develop and review a KT Toolkit for implementation of the CPG. RESULTS: Utilizing the Knowledge-To-Action Cycle framework, eight tools were developed as part of the KT Toolkit and are available with open access to the public. Findings indicate that the Core Outcome Measures Homepage, which houses the KT Toolkit, has had greater than 70,000 views since its publication. CONCLUSIONS: This short report serves as an example of the efforts made to implement a CPG into physical therapy practice. The processes to facilitate KT and the tools developed can inform future implementation efforts and underscore the importance of having a KT Task Force to implement a CPG. Moving forward, KT Task Forces should be convened to implement new or revised guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: N/A.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This paper describes a recent practice analysis of neurologic physical therapy. The purpose of the analysis was to describe the knowledge, skills, and abilities of a neurologic physical therapist and to distinguish elements that the neurologic specialist may perform differently from a nonspecialist. The analysis was done to revalidate and revise the Description of Specialty Practice used by the American Board of Physical Therapy Specialties (ABPTS). This Description supports the test plan for the neurologic certification examination. METHODS: A survey was developed by a subject matter expert group and was finalized by analysis of pilot survey data. The final survey consisted of 303 items about the duties, roles, procedures, and knowledge of neurologic physical therapists. Respondents were asked to rate items on frequency, importance, level of criticality, and level of judgment. Respondents were also asked to provide input about examination content percentages and their own clinical practice and demographics. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 590 members of the APTA's Neurology Section. The responses of 187 (32% return rate) physical therapists were combined with 30 responses to the pilot survey for analysis. The data yielded a new neurologic certification examination test plan and description of neurologic specialty practice. This description emphasizes the professional practice expectations, tests and measures, and intervention skills that characterize a neurologic specialist. SUMMARY: The results of this survey represent a summary of current neurologic specialty practice and therefore support an outline for the neurologic board certification examination.
