Evaluating the child for sexual abuse.

Child victims of sexual abuse may present with physical findings that can include anogenital problems, enuresis or encopresis. Behavioral changes may involve sexual acting out, aggression, depression, eating disturbances and regression. Because the examination findings of most child victims of sexual abuse are within normal limits or are nonspecific, the child's statements are extremely important. The child's history as obtained by the physician may be admitted as evidence in court trials; therefore, complete documentation of questions and answers is critical. A careful history should be obtained and a thorough physical examination should be performed with documentation of all findings. When examining the child's genitalia, it is important that the physician be familiar with normal variants, non-specific changes and diagnostic signs of sexual abuse. Judicious use of laboratory tests, along with appropriate therapy, should be individually tailored. Forensic evidence collection is indicated in certain cases. Referral for psychologic services is important because victims of abuse are more likely to have depression, anxiety disorders, behavioral problems and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Comparison of the urine-based ligase chain reaction test to culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in pediatric sexual abuse victims.

BACKGROUND: The urine-based ligase chain reaction (LCR) assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae is an attractive alternative to culture because of the relative ease with which specimens may be collected, transported and processed. In addition LCR offers superior sensitivity while maintaining high specificity when compared with culture in various studies of adolescents and adults. A study comparing LCR to culture has not been published concerning children. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, comparison trial of the urine-based LCR test for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae as compared with culture among children at a specialized referral center for evaluation for alleged sexual assault. Of the 1,010 children presenting to the center during the study period, 164 met the study requirements for risk of a sexually transmissible disease and collection of both culture and urine LCR specimens. RESULTS: Eight specimens tested positive by both methods for C. trachomatis. Another 10 specimens tested positive for C. trachomatis by LCR but were negative by culture. No patient with a negative LCR for C. trachomatis had a positive culture. For N. gonorrhoeae 2 specimens tested positive by both methods, and 3 specimens tested positive by LCR but negative by culture. No patient with a negative LCR for N. gonorrhoeae had a positive culture. CONCLUSIONS: The low prevalence of disease in the study population precluded statistical analysis. LCR may prove to be as specific and more sensitive than culture for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae in children. Further studies are needed.

Evaluation of sexual abuse in the pediatric patient.

Evaluating a patient for suspected child sexual abuse can be daunting for many pediatric primary care practitioners. The consequences of misdiagnosis can be devastating. Knowledge of common clinical presentations, both physical signs and symptoms and behavioral changes, is paramount. Sexual abuse allegations must be reported and investigated by child protection agencies or law enforcement. Practitioners must be aware of when and how to report suspected child sexual abuse, in addition to having a basic understanding of the medical examination and findings. With a caring, knowledgeable, and sensitive approach to allegations of sexual abuse, the practitioner can assist the child and his or her family through this very difficult process.