Differential Use of Radiotherapy Fractionation Regimens in Prostate Cancer.

Importance: Technical advances in treatment of prostate cancer and a better understanding of prostate cancer biology have allowed for hypofractionated treatment courses using a higher dose per fraction. Use of ultrahypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has also been characterized. Objective: To characterize US national trends of different RT fractionation schemes across risk groups of prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data collected by the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to characterize the fractionation regimens used for 302 035 patients diagnosed as having prostate cancer from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2020, who underwent definitive RT. The analysis was performed between February 1 and April 30, 2023. Exposure: Stereotactic body RT or ultrahypofractionation, defined as 5 or fewer fractions of external beam RT (EBRT), moderate hypofractionation, defined as 20 to 28 fractions of EBRT, or conventional fractionation, defined as all remaining EBRT fractionation schemes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Temporal trends and clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with SBRT, moderate hypofractionation, and conventional fractionation use. Results: A total of 302 035 men receiving EBRT for localized prostate cancer between 2004 and 2020 were identified (40.1% aged 60-69 years). Black patients comprised 17.6% of this cohort; White patients, 77.9%; and other races and ethnicities, 4.5%. Patients with low-risk disease comprised 17.5% of the cohort; favorable intermediate-risk disease, 23.5%; unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, 23.9%; and high-risk disease, 35.1%. Treatment consisted of conventional fractionation for 81.2%, moderate hypofractionation for 12.9%, and SBRT for 6.0%. The rate of increase over time in patients receiving SBRT compared with conventional fractionation was higher (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] for 2005 vs 2004, 3.18 [95% CI, 2.04-4.94; P < .001]; AOR for 2020 vs 2004, 264.69 [95% CI, 179.33-390.68; P < .001]) than the rate of increase in patients receiving moderate hypofractionation compared with conventional fractionation (AOR for 2005 vs 2004, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.98-1.12; P = .19]; AOR for 2020 vs 2004, 4.41 [95% CI, 4.15-4.69; P < .001]). Compared with White patients, Black patients were less likely to receive SBRT compared with conventional fractionation or moderate hypofractionation (AOR for conventional fractionation, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.80-0.89; P < .001]; AOR for moderate hypofractionation, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.72-0.81; P < .001]). Compared with 2019, patients treated with all fractionation regimens declined in 2020 by 24.4%. Conclusions and Relevance: In this hospital-based cohort study of patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive EBRT, use of moderate hypofractionation and SBRT regimens for definitive prostate cancer treatment has increased from 2004 to 2020. Despite this increasing trend, findings suggest potential health care disparities for Black patients receiving EBRT for localized prostate cancer. The number of patients treated with EBRT in the year 2020 decreased, coinciding with official onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020.

Role of endorectal magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in two different Gleason scores in prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The major goal of the work was to record three-dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) and to compare metabolite ratios between different Gleason scores (GS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRSI localized by endorectal coil-acquired point-resolved spectroscopy was performed in 14 men with prostate cancer of GS 6 (n = 7) and 7 (n = 7) using a 1.5-tesla MRI scanner. RESULTS: The ratio of (choline + creatine)/citrate was increased with an increase of GS, i.e. 0.590 ± 0.171 in the target lesion and 0.321 ± 0.157 in the contralateral region of patients with a GS of 6 as opposed to 1.082 ± 0.432 in the target lesion and 0.360 ± 0.243 in the contralateral region of patients with a GS of 7. CONCLUSION: Our pilot results demonstrated that MRSI was an additional biochemical tool which is complementary to the current imaging modalities for early diagnosis and therapeutic management of prostate cancer.

Correlation of endorectal 2D JPRESS findings with pathological Gleason scores in prostate cancer patients.

To determine the metabolite ratios of (Cho + Cr)/Cit and (Cho + Cr)/Spm in patients with two ranges of pathological Gleason scores, namely (3 + 4) and (4 + 3). By using the localized two-dimensional (2D) J-resolved spectroscopy (JPRESS) technique, the metabolites ratios can be calculated and correlated with prostate cancer aggressiveness. A total of 24 patients who underwent endorectal 2D JPRESS between April 2006 and July 2007 were included in this study. The 2D JPRESS voxel was localized predominantly in the peripheral zone suspected for malignancy based on pathology. Using the metabolites such as total choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), spermine (Spm) and citrate (Cit), the ratios (Cho + Cr)/Cit and (Cho + Cr)/Spm were calculated. In 14 prostate cancer patients who had a final pathologic Gleason scores of i) (3 + 4 = 7, n = 7) and ii) (4 + 3 = 7, n = 7), the metabolite ratios (mean +/- SD) of (Cho + Cr)/Cit and (Cho + Cr)/Spm were calculated using the 2D JPRESS spectra as follows: i) (1.48 +/- 0.83) and (1.59 +/- 0.73); ii) (2.90 +/- 0.94) and (2.71 +/- 1.47), respectively. Higher percentage of aggressive disease correlates with higher metabolites ratio. Our pilot study suggests that 2D JPRESS can be reliably evaluated in a clinical setting using an endorectal coil. In addition to the citrate ratio, the spermine ratio also correlates with pathology based Gleason score.