Intensive care following in-hospital cardiac arrest / periarrest calls-experience from one Scottish hospital.

BACKGROUND: In-hospital cardiac arrest/periarrest is a recognised trigger for consideration of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to investigate the rates of ICU admission following in-hospital cardiac arrest/periarrest, evaluate the outcomes of such patients and assess whether anticipatory care planning had taken place prior to the adult resuscitation team being called. METHODS: Analysis of all referrals to the ICU page-holder within our district general hospital is between 1st November 2018 and 31st May 2019. From this, the frequency of adult resuscitation team calls was determined. Case notes were then reviewed to determine details of the events, patient outcomes and the use of anticipatory care planning tools on wards. RESULTS: Of the 506 referrals to the ICU page-holder, 141 (27.9%) were adult resuscitation team calls (114 periarrests and 27 cardiac arrests). Twelve patients were excluded due to health records being unavailable. Admission rates to ICU were low - 17.4% for cardiac arrests (4/23 patients), 5.7% (6/106) following periarrest. The primary reason for not admitting to ICU was patients being "too well" at the time of review (78/129 - 60.5%). Prior to adult resuscitation team call, treatment escalation plans had been completed in 27.9% (36/129) with Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) forms present in 15.5% of cases (20/129). Four cardiac arrest calls were made in the presence of a valid DNACPR form, frequently due to a lack of awareness of the patient's resuscitation status. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the significant workload for the ICU page-holder brought about by adult resuscitation team calls. There is a low admission rate from these calls, and, at the time of resuscitation team call, anticipatory planning is frequently either incomplete or poorly communicated. Addressing these issues requires a collaborative approach between ICU and non-ICU physicians and highlights the need for larger studies to develop scoring systems to aid objective admission decision-making.

The ethics of treating family members.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Many medical professionals receive requests from family and friends asking for medical advice and treatment. But should medics treat their family? Ethically can we treat, or refuse to treat, family members? This is a common ethical challenge that most doctors face during their career and there is limited evidence available. By examining ethical principles, we aim to answer these questions and provide a framework that will guide decision making in this area. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a paucity of evidence available. Many ethical systems exist and have been discussed since ancient Greece but in recent years, bioethics has become more prominent in medical thinking and debate. SUMMARY: We examine ethical systems such as virtue ethics, utilitarianism, deontology and principlism and how they relate to treating family members. We then look at cases in different contexts and describe a system for approaching such cases, allowing doctors to conform to moral standards, and consider ethical arguments, prior to embarking upon any treatment course with a relative.

Resource allocation in ICU: ethical considerations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Increasing scarcity of resources on the background of ever improving medical care and prolonged life expectancy has placed a burden on all aspects of health care. In this article we examine the current problems with resource allocation in intensive care and question whether we can find guidance on appropriate resource allocation through ethical models. RECENT FINDINGS: The problem of fair and ethical resource allocation has perpetually plagued health care. Recent work has looked at value for money, benefits of therapies and how we define futility, but these still fall victim to the same problems that classical schools of ethical thought have tried to tackle. SUMMARY: Many ethical principles provide a framework on which to allocate resources to certain cohorts of patients, however, most appear too rigid to be fully and primarily utilized for intensive care admission. We suggest a collaboration of principles be applied to achieve a moral, ethical and common sense approach to this issue. Over resourcing and under resourcing is also suggested to be problematic for patients and healthcare workers alike.