Effect of increased time in the therapeutic range on atrial fibrillation outcomes within a centralized anticoagulation service.

BACKGROUND: Clinical pharmacy anticoagulation services have improved the quality of anticoagulant therapy and are associated with lower rates of bleeding and thromboembolism compared to usual care. Several studies have found that higher time-in-therapeutic range (TTR) during warfarin therapy is associated with better warfarin outcomes. However, whether increasing TTR over time within an established anticoagulation service is associated with further reduction in bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes is unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation conducted at an integrated healthcare delivery system with a centralized, pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service. Clinical outcomes (clinically-relevant bleeding, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality) and TTR were compared between two distinct time periods: 1/1/2006 through 12/31/2007 (control group) and 1/1/2012 through 12/31/2013 (observation group) with regression modeling to adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: There were 3641 and 4764 patients in the control and observation groups, respectively. The mean age was 74.3 years and 54.4% of the cohort was female. Mean TTR was higher in the observation group (70.5% vs. 63.4%, p < 0.001). The composite outcome of clinically-relevant bleeding, thromboembolism and all-cause mortality occurred in 4.6% and 3.6% of the control and observation groups, respectively (adjusted odds ratio = 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.87). Individual rates of stroke/systemic embolism and all-cause mortality were each lower in the observation group (both p < 0.05) while clinically-relevant bleeding was not significantly different (p = 0.256). CONCLUSION: Increased TTR within a clinical pharmacy anticoagulation management service was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcomes of bleeding, thromboembolism and death in a large atrial fibrillation population receiving warfarin.

Bleeding, Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism, and Mortality Risks During Warfarin Interruption for Invasive Procedures.

IMPORTANCE: The risk of bleeding and recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients receiving long-term warfarin sodium therapy for secondary VTE prevention who require temporary interruption of anticoagulant therapy for surgery or invasive diagnostic procedures has not been adequately described. OBJECTIVE: To describe the rates of clinically relevant bleeding and recurrent VTE among patients in whom warfarin therapy is interrupted for invasive procedures and compare these rates among patients who did and did not receive bridge therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, an integrated health care delivery system. Patients in whom warfarin therapy was interrupted for invasive diagnostic or surgical procedures between January 1, 2006, and March 31, 2012, were identified via queries of administrative data sets. A total of 1812 procedures in 1178 patients met inclusion criteria. Data on outcomes and exposures were collected between June 1, 2005, and April 30, 2012. EXPOSURES: Use of bridge therapy vs no bridge therapy during warfarin interruption. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Thirty-day clinically relevant bleeding, recurrent VTE, and all-cause mortality. Outcomes were verified via manual review of medical records. RESULTS: Among the 1178 patients, the mean (SD) age was 66.1 (12.7) years, 830 procedures (45.8%) were in men, and the most common indication for warfarin therapy was deep vein thrombosis (56.3%). Most patients were considered to be at low risk for VTE recurrence at the time of warfarin interruption (1431 procedures [79.0%]) according to the consensus guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians. Clinically relevant bleeding within 30 days after the procedure in the bridge therapy and non-bridge therapy groups occurred in 15 patients (2.7%) and 2 patients (0.2%), respectively (hazard ratio, 17.2; 95% CI, 3.9-75.1). There was no significant difference in the rate of recurrent VTE between the bridge and non-bridge therapy groups (0 vs 3; P = .56). No deaths occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Bridge therapy was associated with an increased risk of bleeding during warfarin therapy interruption for invasive procedures in patients receiving treatment for a history of VTE and is likely unnecessary for most of these patients. Further research is needed to identify patient- and procedure-related characteristics associated with a high risk of perioperative VTE recurrence during warfarin therapy interruption.

Assessment of warfarin dosing requirements after bariatric surgery in patients requiring long-term warfarin therapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To quantify the change in weekly warfarin dose after bariatric surgery in patients requiring long-term warfarin therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective matched-cohort study. SETTING: Anticoagulation management service in an integrated health care delivery system. PATIENTS: Patients receiving long-term warfarin anticoagulation who underwent bariatric surgery between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2010 (27 patients), were matched by date of surgery (± 2 years), age (± 5 years), and target international normalized ratio (INR) range to patients receiving long-term anticoagulation therapy who underwent other abdominal surgical procedures: cholecystectomy or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (59 patients [control group]). MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The main end point was change in postoperative warfarin dose from baseline (preoperative dose), measured at weekly postoperative intervals from weeks 1 to 8 and again at months 3 and 6. After surgery, patients in the bariatric surgery group had statistically significant decreases in weekly warfarin doses compared with preoperative dose at all postoperative time points (week 1 dose vs preoperative dose, p<0.01; doses at all other time points vs preoperative dose, p<0.001), except at 6 months (p>0.05). No statistically significant decreases in warfarin dose were detected at any postoperative time points in the control group. Twenty patients (74.1%) in the bariatric surgery group experienced a 20% or more decrease in weekly warfarin dose compared with 19 patients (32.2%) in the control group (p=0.004). No significant differences in warfarin-related adverse events were noted between groups. CONCLUSION: Weekly warfarin doses decreased in the immediate postoperative period in anticoagulated patients after bariatric surgery but returned to their preoperative doses after approximately 6 months. A similar pattern was not observed in patients in the control group who underwent other types of abdominal surgery. Compared with preoperative anticoagulation control, this resulted in reduced anticoagulation control despite close INR monitoring. If a causal relationship between bariatric surgery and warfarin sensitivity is established in future research, developing and validating a postbariatric surgery warfarin-dosing algorithm would be valuable.