RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Given substantial advances in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) technology, long-term support is increasingly feasible. Although the benefits of short-term ECMO as a bridge to recovery in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are well described, the utility and outcomes of long-term support remain unclear. METHODS: Patients requiring ECMO for ARDS between January 2009 and November 2012 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed separately for those requiring ECMO support for less than 3 weeks or for 3 weeks or longer. Demographic factors, ECMO variables, and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with ARDS received ECMO during the study period, with 11 patients requiring long-term ECMO support and a median duration of 36 (interquartile range: 24 to 68) days. Recovery was the initial goal in all patients. Pre-ECMO mechanical ventilatory support, indices of disease severity, and the ECMO cannulation strategy were similar between the two groups. Eight (73%) patients receiving long-term support were bridged to recovery, and 1 patient was bridged to transplantation after a refractory course. Eight (73%) patients receiving long-term support and 25 (57%) patients receiving short-term support survived to 30 days and hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Previously, long-term ECMO support was thought to be associated with unfavorable outcomes. This study, however, may provide support for the efficacy of ECMO support even for 3 weeks or more as a bridge to recovery or transplantation.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Respiração Artificial , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has increased as a bridge to recovery for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) refractory to conventional support. Morbid obesity can pose a significant challenge to obtaining indexed flows, and outcomes in this population are not well described. METHODS: Patients requiring ECMO for ARDS between January 2009 and November 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, ECMO variables, and outcomes were assessed. Morbid obesity and super obesity were defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m(2) and greater than 50 kg/m(2), respectively. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with ARDS were placed on ECMO during the study period. Twelve were morbidly obese with a BMI of 49.0 kg/m(2) (interquartile range [IQR]: 45.4-57.3 kg/m(2)). Pre-ECMO mechanical ventilatory support and indices of disease severity were similar between the 2 groups, as were cannulation strategy and duration of ECMO support. Nine (75%) morbidly obese patients and 27 (63%) non-morbidly obese patients were successfully weaned from ECMO support, and patient survival to time of discharge was 67% and 58%, respectively. In the subset of super obese patients (n = 6; BMI, 57.3 kg/m(2) [IQR: 51.3-66.5 kg/m(2)]), recovery and midterm survival was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: In this review, class III obesity was not associated with poorer outcomes, and based on these data, ECMO support should not be withheld from this patient population.