The effect of a patellar brace on three-dimensional patellar kinematics in patients with lateral patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Patellar bracing is a mechanical treatment strategy for patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) that aims to unload the lateral compartment of the joint by translating the patella medially. Our objective was to determine whether a patellar brace can correct patellar kinematics in patients with patellofemoral OA. DESIGN: We assessed the effect of a patellar brace on three-dimensional patellar kinematics (flexion, spin and tilt; proximal, lateral and anterior translation) at sequential, static knee postures, using a validated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based method, in 19 patients with radiographic lateral patellofemoral OA. Differences in kinematics between unbraced and braced conditions were assessed in the unloaded and loaded knee (15% bodyweight load) using hierarchical linear random-effects models. Random slope and quadratic terms were included in the model when significant (P<0.05). RESULTS: Bracing with load caused the patellae to translate 0.46 mm medially (P<0.001), tilt 1.17° medially (P<0.001), spin 0.62° externally (P=0.012) and translate 1.09 mm distally (P<0.001) and 0.47 mm anteriorly (P<0.001) over the range of knee flexion angles studied. Bracing also caused the patellae to extend in early angles of knee flexion (P<0.001). The brace caused similar trends for the unloaded condition, though magnitudes of the changes varied. CONCLUSION: Bracing changed patellar kinematics, but these changes did not appear large enough to be clinically meaningful because no reduction in pain was observed in the parent study.

A randomized trial of patellofemoral bracing for treatment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: The number of effective knee osteoarthritis (OA) interventions, especially those tailored to specific compartmental involvement, are small. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of a realigning patellofemoral (PF) brace in improving pain and function among persons with symptomatic lateral PF OA. METHOD: We conducted a double blind, randomized crossover trial of a realigning PF brace for persons with lateral PF OA. Participants had lateral PF OA with anterior knee symptoms on most days of the month, lateral PF joint space narrowing, and radiographic evidence of a definite osteophyte in the PF joint. We compared two treatments: (1) Control treatment consisting of a BioSkin Q Brace with patellar realigning strap removed; and (2) Active treatment consisting of a realigning BioSkin Q Brace with the strap applied. For each participant, the trial lasted 18 weeks, including 6 weeks each of active and control treatment period separated by a 6-week washout period. The order of treatments was randomized. The primary outcome was change in knee pain on the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included WOMAC pain, function, and stiffness. An unstructured correlation matrix for observations within participants was used in generalized estimating equation fitting to derive a linear regression model that expressed the relation between the intervention and change in VAS pain. RESULTS: 80 participants (63 F) with a mean age and body mass index of 61 years and 28 kg/m(2), respectively, were randomized by order of treatment. A model examining the main effects for change in VAS knee pain (0-100) demonstrated no significant treatment effect (-0.68 VAS units, 95% CI: -6.2, 4.8 units, P=0.81) and no differential carryover effect. There was also no significant difference between active and control treatments for WOMAC pain, function, or stiffness outcomes. CONCLUSION: The effects of a specific realigning PF brace are not of clinical or statistical significance.

Knee alignment differences between Chinese and Caucasian subjects without osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the lower prevalence of obesity (a known risk factor for osteoarthritis (OA)), the prevalence of lateral tibiofemoral OA is higher in Chinese communities compared with Caucasian communities. One potential explanation is the difference in knee alignment between the two populations. We measured various knee alignment indices among Chinese and Caucasians and assessed whether these indices were different between the two racial groups. METHODS: We selected participants from the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study (FOA) and the Beijing Osteoarthritis Study (BOA), all without knee OA (Kellgren & Lawrence grade <2). Bilateral, fully extended anteroposterior knee radiographs were measured for the following angles in both knees: the anatomic axis (AA), the condylar angle (CA), the tibial plateau angle and the condylar-plateau angle (CP). We compared the mean of each measurement between the two racial groups adjusting for age and body mass index using linear regression and stratified by sex. RESULTS: The mean AA, CA and CP were significantly different in the BOA compared with the FOA. For women, the mean AA and CA were significantly more valgus in BOA subjects, while in men, the mean AA and CP were more valgus in BOA subjects. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in knee morphology between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts, which result in a more valgus alignment of the distal femur in Chinese. This would serve to shift the mechanical loading towards the lateral compartment, and provide a possible explanation why Chinese have a higher prevalence of lateral tibiofemoral OA.