Indicators of pulmonary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis: A Delphi survey of patients and health professionals.

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the most important indicators of pulmonary exacerbations in CF. METHODS: Two parallel Delphi surveys in 13 CF centres (UK and Ireland). Delphi 1: 31 adults with CF, ≥ one exacerbation over 12 months. Delphi 2: 38 CF health professionals. Rounds 1 and 2 participants rated their level of agreement with statements relating to indicators of exacerbation; Round 3 participants rated the importance of statements which were subsequently placed in rank order. RESULTS: Objective measurements were of higher importance to health professionals. Feelings of increased debility were rated most important by adults with CF. CONCLUSIONS: There were clear differences in perspectives between the two groups as to the most important indicators of an exacerbation. This highlights that CF health professionals should take more cognisance of specific signs and symptoms reported by adults with CF, especially since these may be a precursor to an exacerbation.

Sensitivity of the breastfeeding motivational measurement scale: a known group analysis of first time mothers.

Breastfeeding has immense public health value for mothers, babies, and society. But there is an undesirably large gap between the number of new mothers who undertake and persist in breastfeeding compared to what would be a preferred level of accomplishment. This gap is a reflection of the many obstacles, both physical and psychological, that confront new mothers. Previous research has illuminated many of these concerns, but research on this problem is limited in part by the unavailability of a research instrument that can measure the key differences between first-time mothers and experienced mothers, with regard to the challenges they face when breastfeeding and the instructional advice they require. An instrument was designed to measure motivational complexity associated with sustained breast feeding behaviour; the Breastfeeding Motivational Measurement Scale. It contains 51 self-report items (7 point Likert scale) that cluster into four categories related to perceived value of breast-feeding, confidence to succeed, factors that influence success or failure, and strength of intentions, or goal. However, this scale has not been validated in terms of its sensitivity to profile the motivation of new mothers and experienced mothers. This issue was investigated by having 202 breastfeeding mothers (100 first time mothers) fill out the scale. The analysis reported in this paper is a three factor solution consisting of value, midwife support, and expectancies for success that explained the characteristics of first time mothers as a known group. These results support the validity of the BMM scale as a diagnostic tool for research on first time mothers who are learning to breastfeed. Further research studies are required to further test the validity of the scale in additional subgroups.

Long-term survival from 801 adjunctive coronary endarterectomies in diffuse coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: The role of coronary endarterectomy (CE) in modern cardiac surgery has been an extant debate as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has advanced. However, as cardiac surgeons are being referred ever more complex coronary disease for surgical correction, adjunctive strategies may need re-evaluation. The long-term results of CE are largely unknown. We present the longest cohort follow-up in a single institution looking at our 20-year experience of CEs employed as an adjunct to CABG in diffuse coronary artery disease. METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively on 801 patients undergoing CEs between February 1988 and September 2010 by a single surgeon using a standard open hydrodissection technique. We looked at patient demographics, characteristics of the vessels subjected to endarterectomy and predictors of long-term survival within this surgical group using Cox's regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean age was 63.2 (±9.6) years. The mean number of coronary arteries undergoing endarterectomy was 1.16 (±0.4) per patient. Of these, 63.7% were performed on the right coronary artery (n = 558) and 32.3% on the left anterior descending artery (n = 283). The operative mortality was 2.62% (n = 21). The median survival time was 16.67 years (95% confidence interval 15.14-18.19 years). The significant predictors of survival (P < 0.05) were a lower age at surgery, a lower EuroSCORE I, the absence of peripheral vascular disease and shorter bypass times. CONCLUSION: This significant long-term survival demonstrates that CE can be an attractive adjunct to CABG in otherwise inoperable coronary artery disease.

Assessing education in pulmonary rehabilitation: the Understanding COPD (UCOPD) questionnaire.

There is currently no questionnaire available that comprehensively assesses patients' understanding, self-efficacy and satisfaction with the education component of pulmonary rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to develop the Understanding COPD (UCOPD) questionnaire. The key stages in the development of the UCOPD questionnaire were: (i) Generation of questions, and assessment of face and content validity, user-centredness, acceptability and feasibility; (ii) Assessment of plain English and readability; (iii) Assessment of structural validity; (iv) Assessment of test-retest reliability and internal consistency; (v) Assessment of the responsiveness, convergent validity and floor and ceiling effects. The UCOPD questionnaire assesses understanding, self-efficacy and use of key self-management skills (Section A) and satisfaction (Section B). It has good validity and practical properties, and readability was acceptable. It has good test-retest reliability (Section A: ICC range: 0.87 to 0.96; Section B: Wilcoxon: p > 0.05) and internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha range: 0.78 to 0.95). It is responsive to pulmonary rehabilitation (Mean change: About COPD: 18.26 [12.12 to 24.40]%, Managing Symptoms 20.94 [13.86 to 28.01]%, Accessing Help and Support 24.06 [14.53 to 33.60]%, Total 20.59 [14.43 to 26.75]%, p < 0.001). It had a moderate correlation with the Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire (BCKQ): pre-pulmonary rehabilitation: r = 0.41, p = 0.02; post-pulmonary rehabilitation: r = 0.35, p = 0.047. In conclusion, the UCOPD questionnaire offers the opportunity to assess the benefit of the education component of pulmonary rehabilitation in terms of its effect on understanding, self-efficacy and satisfaction. Further research is needed across different pulmonary rehabilitation settings to demonstrate the robustness of the UCOPD questionnaire, and to establish the minimum clinically important difference.

Factors that influence low back pain in people with a stoma.

PURPOSE: People with a stoma believe that there is a link between their surgery and low back pain (LBP). AIM: To explore factors relating to (i) core stability in people with a stoma and LBP and (ii) biopsychosocial factors related to LBP. METHODS: Adults with an ileostomy and LBP (n = 17) completed (i) a range of standardised instruments, (ii) clinical tests and (iii) an ultrasound scan of right and left transversus abdominis (TrA). RESULTS: The findings showed moderate pain and disability: RMDQ: median = 12 (IQR: 9.5-13), EQ-5D health state: mean = 6.9 (±1.75), BPI pain severity: median = 4.5 (IQR: 2.87-5.4). The TrA contraction was less on the operated than the unoperated side and this was linked to less control for BKFO to the operated side, and the presence of a parastomal hernia. Co-morbidities were associated with greater balance problems during the stork test (p < 0.05). Men had more fear avoidance (p < 0.05) on the FABQ regarding physical activity. DISCUSSION: Abdominal function may be altered after stoma surgery leading to reduced ability to perform functional tasks and a possible increased risk of back pain. These results should be viewed with caution due to the small sample size.

Hypoalgesia in response to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) depends on stimulation intensity.

UNLABELLED: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an electrophysical modality used for pain management. This study investigated the dose response of different TENS intensities on experimentally induced pressure pain. One hundred and thirty TENS naïve healthy individuals (18-64 years old; 65 males, 65 females) were randomly allocated to 5 groups (n = 26 per group): Strong Non Painful TENS; Sensory Threshold TENS; Below Sensory Threshold TENS; No Current Placebo TENS; and Transient Placebo TENS. Active TENS (80 Hz) was applied to the forearm for 30 minutes. Transient Placebo TENS was applied for 42 seconds after which the current amplitude automatically reset to 0 mA. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were recorded from 2 points on the hand and forearm before and after TENS to measure hypoalgesia. There were significant differences between groups at both the hand and forearm (ANOVA; P = .005 and .002). At 30 minutes, there was a significant hypoalgesic effect in the Strong Non Painful TENS group compared to: Below Sensory Threshold TENS, No Current Placebo TENS and Transient Placebo TENS groups (P < .0001) at the forearm; Transient Placebo TENS and No Current Placebo TENS groups at the hand (P = .001). There was no significant difference between Strong Non Painful TENS and Sensory Threshold TENS groups. The area under the curve for the changes in PPT significantly correlated with the current amplitude (r(2) = .33, P = .003). These data therefore show that there is a dose-response effect of TENS with the largest effect occurring with the highest current amplitudes. PERSPECTIVE: This study shows a dose response for the intensity of TENS for pain relief with the strongest intensities showing the greatest effect; thus, we suggest that TENS intensity should be titrated to achieve the strongest possible intensity to achieve maximum pain relief.

Do smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease report their smoking status reliably? A comparison of self-report and bio-chemical validation.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is predominantly caused by cigarette smoking and is considered a worldwide preventable chronic illness. Smoking cessation is considered the primary intervention for disease management and nurses should play a major role in assisting patients to stop smoking. Currently there is a lack of professional consensus on how cessation interventions should be evaluated. The vast array of biochemical markers reported in the literature can be confusing and can make the comparisons of results difficult. OBJECTIVE: To validate self-report data on smoking with exhaled carbon monoxide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease over twelve months. DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of a previously published randomized controlled trial evaluating nursing interventions to assist respiratory patients to stop smoking. SETTING: Northern Ireland's Regional Respiratory Centre. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 91 cigarette smokers attending secondary care for the treatment for COPD participated in the study. METHOD: Self-reported smoking status and cigarettes smoked per day were compared to exhaled carbon monoxide readings at baseline, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The cut-off value of ≤10 ppm was used to identify non-smokers. The p-values are based on Pearson's correlation coefficient and Kappa Coefficient as appropriate. RESULTS: Findings suggest self-reported smoking status and cigarette consumption amongst patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was highly consistent with exhaled carbon monoxide results (p = 0.001-0.003). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease reliably report their cigarette consumption.

An investigation of the hypoalgesic effects of TENS delivered by a glove electrode.

UNLABELLED: This randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded study investigated the hypoalgesic effects of high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) delivered via a glove electrode compared with standard self-adhesive electrodes. Fifty-six TENS-naïve, healthy individuals (18 to 50 years old; 28 men, 28 women) were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 groups (n = 14 per group): glove electrode; placebo TENS using a glove electrode; standard electrode; and no treatment control. Active TENS (continuous stimulus, 100 Hz, strong but comfortable intensity) was applied to the dominant forearm/hand for 30 minutes. Placebo TENS was applied using a burst stimulus, 100-Hz frequency, 5-second cycle time for 42 seconds, after which the current amplitude was automatically reset to 0 mA. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were recorded from 3 points on the dominant and nondominant upper limbs before and after TENS. Statistical analyses of dominant PPT data using between-within groups ANOVA showed significant differences between groups at all 3 recording points (P = .01). Post hoc Scheffe tests indicated no significant difference between the standard electrode and glove electrode groups. There was a significant hypoalgesic effect in the standard electrode group compared with the control group and between the glove electrode group and both the control and placebo TENS groups. There was no significant interactive effect between time and group at any of the recording points (P > .05). PERSPECTIVE: This study presents a comparison of the hypoalgesic effects of 2 different types of TENS electrode, a novel glove electrode and standard self-adhesive rectangular electrodes. The glove electrode provides a larger contact area with the skin, thereby stimulating a greater number of nerve fibers. The results show that both electrodes have similar hypoalgesic effects and therefore give the clinician another choice in electrode.

Which is the correct statistical test to use?

This paper explains how to select the correct statistical test for a research project, clinical trial, or other investigation. The first step is to decide in what scale of measurement your data are as this will affect your decision-nominal, ordinal, or interval. The next stage is to consider the purpose of the analysis-for example, are you comparing independent or paired groups? Several statistical tests are discussed with an explanation of when it is appropriate to use each one; relevant examples of each are provided. If an incorrect test is used, then invalid results and misleading conclusions may be drawn from the study.