Timely Recognition of Abusive Injuries (TRAIN): Results from a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.

Early recognition of physical abuse is critical as children often experience recurrent abuse if their environment remains unchanged. The Timely Recognition of Abusive Injuries (TRAIN) Collaborative was a quality improvement network of 6 Ohio children's hospitals created in 2015 to improve the management of injuries concerning for abuse in infants. TRAIN's first phase sought to reduce recurrent abuse by recognizing and responding to injured infants. This study aimed to reduce reinjury rate among infants ≤6 months by 10% at 1 year and 50% by 2 years and sustain improvement for 1 year as reflected in 3- and 12-month reinjury rates. Methods: The TRAIN Collaborative adopted the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Breakthrough Series Collaborative Model, where partnerships between organizations facilitate learning from each other and experts. Collaborative members identified opportunities to improve injury recognition, implemented changes, responded to data, and reconvened to share successes and obstacles. As a result, institutions implemented different interventions, including education for clinical staff, increased social work involvement, and scripting for providers. Results: Data collected over 3 years were compared to a 12-month baseline. The number of injuries increased from 51 children with concerning injuries identified monthly to 76 children sustained throughout the collaborative. However, within 2 years, the 3- and 12-month reinjury rates ultimately significantly decreased from 5.7% to 2.1% and 6.5% to 3.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Our data suggest the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Breakthrough Series model can be applied across large populations to improve secondary injury prevention in infants.

From Arksey and O'Malley and Beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology.

This article presents a method of conducting a scoping review that synthesizes recommendations from previous literature while contributing additional customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed method approach. A form of knowledge synthesis, scoping reviews aim to describe the breadth of an existent knowledge base and inform future research, practice, and policy. Scoping review methodology has continued to evolve since the inception of the Arksey and O'Malley Framework in 2005. After examining recommendations from the body of literature on scoping review methodology and scoping reviews about scoping reviews, we found that teamwork and mixed method approaches were rarely addressed. Following the Arksey and O'Malley Framework, we discuss current recommendations within the literature, rationale for our customizations to enhance the method, and present an application of these customizations as illustrated in our companion article, "Outcomes and outputs affiliated with children's advocacy centers in the United States: A scoping review."In sum, our enhancements to the Arksey and O'Malley Framework:•Explicitly integrate qualitative and quantitative assessment of the literature following best practices in mixed methods research, and,•Integrate a team-based approach throughout all stages of the scoping review process.

Outcomes and outputs affiliated with Children's Advocacy Centers in the United States: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The Children's Advocacy Center (CAC) model is the predominant multidisciplinary model that responds to child sexual abuse (CSA) in the United States (US). While the CAC model has made important contributions in case coordination and referrals for specialty services, little is known about child- or family-oriented outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Explore the trends and gaps involving outcome and output measures affiliated with CACs in the US. PARTICIPANTS & SETTING: A scoping review of the literature was conducted on English language articles published between 1985-2019 that involved CACs and children less than 18 years of age. METHODS: An electronic database search using the terms "Children's Advocacy Center(s)," "Child Advocacy Center(s)," and "CAC(s)" identified titles and abstracts. Data from articles selected for full text review were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team using a mixed methods approach. RESULTS: Measures of CAC impact frequently focus on service and programmatic outputs with person-centered outcomes left often reported. The most prevalent output measures related to case prosecution and forensic interviews. Person-centered outcomes most commonly emphasized child mental health and caregiver satisfaction. The majority of articles were limited by weak or unspecified study designs. CONCLUSION: The current literature on CACs suggests that while they are successful in coordinating services and facilitating referrals, little is known about how engagement with CACs impacts short- and long-term outcomes for children and families. Further research beyond cross sectional or quasi-experimental designs is necessary to better understand how variability in CAC structure, function, and resources can be optimized to meet the needs of the diverse communities that they serve. This is especially salient given the national dissemination of the CAC model. Without such additional studies, knowledge will remain limited regarding the enduring impacts of CACs on the lives of those impacted by CSA.

Foster Care and Child Health.

Children in foster care need more from health providers than routine well-child care. The changes in legislation that were designed to prevent children from languishing in foster care also necessitate a plan that works with the child, the biological family, and the foster family in ensuring the best outcome for the child. This approach acknowledges that most foster children will return to the biological family. Recent research on the effect of adverse childhood experiences across all socioeconomic categories points to the need for specifically designed, focused, and coordinated health and mental health services for children in foster care.

Increased incidence of nonaccidental head trauma in infants associated with the economic recession.

OBJECT: Nonaccidental head trauma (NAHT) is a major cause of death in infants. During the current economic recession, the authors noticed an anecdotal increase in infants with NAHT without an increase in the overall number of infants admitted with traumatic injuries. An analysis was performed to determine whether there was an association between economic recession and NAHT. METHODS: With Institutional Review Board approval, the trauma database was searched for NAHT in infants 0-2 years old during nonrecession (December 2001 to November 2007) and recession (December 2007 to June 2010) periods. Incidence is reported as infants with NAHT per month summarized over time periods. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U-tests, and proportions were compared using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-nine infant traumas were observed during the study time period. From the nonrecession to the recession period, there was an 8.2% reduction in all traumas (458 in 72 months [6.4 /month] vs 181 in 31 months [5.8/month]) and a 3.5% reduction in accidental head traumas (142 in 72 months [2.0/month] vs 59 in 31 months [1.9/month]). Nonaccidental head trauma accounted for 14.6% of all traumas (93/639). The median patient age was 4.0 months and 52% were boys. There were no significant differences in the representative counties of referral or demographics between nonrecession and recession populations (all p > 0.05). The monthly incidence rates of NAHT doubled from nonrecession to recession periods (50 in 72 months [0.7/month] vs 43 in 31 months [1.4/month]; p = 0.01). During this recession, at least 1 NAHT was reported in 68% of the months compared with 44% of the months during the nonrecession period (p = 0.03). The severity of NAHTs also increased, with a greater proportion of deaths (11.6% vs 4%, respectively; p = 0.16) and severe brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8: 19.5% vs 4%, respectively; p = 0.06) during the recession. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of an overall reduction in head trauma, the significant increase in the incidence of NAHT appears coincident with economic recession. Although the cause is likely multifactorial, a full analysis of the basis of this increase is beyond the scope of this study. This study highlights the need to protect vulnerable infants during challenging economic times.