Bone suture anchor fixation in the lower extremity: a review of insertion principles and a comparative biomechanical evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Suture anchors have been developed for the fixation of ligaments, capsules, or tendons to bone. These devices have led to improved fixation, smaller incisions, earlier limb mobility, and improved outcomes. They were originally developed for use in shoulder reconstructions but are now used in almost all extremities. In the lower leg they are used in the tibia, the talus, the calcaneus, tarsal bones, and phalanges. Nevertheless, techniques for insertion and mechanisms of failure are not well described. METHODS: Five suture anchors were studied to determine the pullout strength in four distal cadaver femurs and four proximal cadaver tibias from 55- and 62-year-old males. Eight hundred ninety Newton line was used, testing the anchors to failure with an Instron testing device (Instron, Norwood, MA). The anchor devices were inserted randomly and tested blindly (12 tests per anchor device, 60 tests in all). RESULTS: Two anchors in each group tested failed at low loads. Both types of plastic anchors had failures at the eyelet. Average pullout strength varied from 85.4 to 185.6 N. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion techniques are specific for each device, and they must be followed for optimal fixation. In this study, in all five groups of anchors tested two of the 12 anchors in each group failed with minimal force. On the basis of this finding we recommend that, if suture anchor fixation is necessary, at least two anchors should be used. Since there appears to be a percentage of failure in all devices, the second anchor can serve as a backup. It is imperative that surgeons be familiar with the insertion techniques of each device before use.

Variations in fibular position, talar length, and anterior talofibular ligament length.

BACKGROUND: Proprioceptive deficiencies, peroneal muscle weakness, varus hindfoot, and varus tibial plafond have each been implicated as a predisposing factor in recurrent ankle instability. Another predisposing factor for instability is a position of the fibula posterior to the transverse axis of the talus. This study examined the relationship of fibular position and ankle instability with anatomic dissection and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Data were obtained from 100 consecutive MRI scans of adult ankles: the malleolar index in degrees and the fibular position anterior or posterior to the anteromedial malleolar plane and relative to the transverse axis of the talus. Twenty cadaver ankles also were studied by MRI and then by anatomic dissection. The malleolar index, the talar length, and the length of the anterior talofibular (ATF) ligament were recorded. RESULTS: The MRI study showed that variation of the malleolar index ranged from 2 to 30 degrees. There was no correlation between the malleolar index and the talar length or the length of the ATF ligament. CONCLUSIONS: There is a bell-shaped curve of variation of the position of the fibula relative to the transverse axis of the talus. An ankle mortise with a more posteriorly positioned fibula has less structural stability and is more susceptible to sprain. Neither talar length nor ATF ligament length correlated with fibular position.