Effect of changes in tidal volume on multiple breath washout outcomes.

The lung clearance index (LCI), measured by multiple breath washout (MBW), reflects global ventilation inhomogeneity and is a sensitive marker of early obstructive airway disease. For the MBW test to accurately reflect a subject's gas mixing within the lungs, the breathing pattern should represent physiologically appropriate tidal volumes (VT) and respiratory rate (RR). We aimed to assess whether changes in VT impact MBW outcome measures with a series of prospective and retrospective studies. MBW testing was performed using the Exhalyzer ® D (EcoMedics AG, Switzerland). Healthy adult subjects performed MBW with uninstructed tidal breathing and a series of instructed tidal breathing tests, designed to isolate specific features of the breathing pattern. In addition, we retrospectively analyzed MBW data from two pediatric multi-centre interventional studies of cystic fibrosis (CF) subjects to determine the range of VT observed during uninstructed breathing, and whether breathing outside this range impacted results. The LCI was lower, but not significantly different between deep breathing at 20 ml/kg body weight and uninstructed tidal breathing; whereas LCI was significantly higher during shallow breathing compared with normal tidal breathing. For the majority of subjects with CF (80%), VT ranged from 9-15mL/kg. Within the observed VT range, LCI was similar in trials with mean VT /kg below this range compared to trials with VT /kg within the range. If subjects breathe naturally and are not instructed to use specific targets, the range of VT is within physiologically appropriate limits and normal variations observed do not impact MBW outcomes.

Does the multiple-breath washout test need to be measured before spirometry?

Spirometry does not have a short-term effect on multiple-breath washout outcomes, thus allowing greater flexibility for implementation into clinical practice http://ow.ly/2Tg330ngXk4.

Comparison of facemask and mouthpiece interfaces for multiple breath washout measurements.

BACKGROUND: Different interfaces (mouthpiece/nose clip vs. facemask) are used during multiple breath washout (MBW) tests in young children. METHODS: We investigated the effect of interface choice and breathing modalities on MBW outcomes in healthy adults and preschool children. RESULTS: In adults (n = 26) facemask breathing significantly increased LCI, compared to mouthpiece use (mean difference (95% CI) 0.4 (0.2; 0.6)), with results generalizable across sites and different equipment. Exclusively nasal breathing within the facemask increased LCI, as compared to oral breathing. In preschoolers (2-6 years, n = 46), no significant inter-test difference was observed across interfaces for LCI or FRC. Feasibility and breathing stability were significantly greater with facemask (incorporating dead space volume minimization), vs. mouthpiece. This was more pronounced in subjects <4 years of age. CONCLUSION: Both nasal vs. oral breathing and mouthpiece vs. facemask affect LCI measurements in adults. This effect was minimal in preschool children, where switching between interfaces is most likely to occur.

Correcting for tissue nitrogen excretion in multiple breath washout measurements.

Nitrogen excreted from body tissues impacts the calculation of multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBWN2) outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of tissue N2 on MBWN2 outcomes in both healthy subjects and patients with CF and to assess whether it is possible to correct for tissue N2. The contribution of tissue N2 to MBWN2 outcomes was estimated by comparing MBWN2-derived functional residual capacity (FRCN2) to FRC measured by body plethysmography (FRCpleth) and by comparing MBW outcome measures derived from MBWN2 and sulfur hexafluoride MBW (MBWSF6). Compared to plethysmography and MBWSF6, MBWN2 overestimated FRC and lung clearance index (LCI). Application of mathematical tissue N2 corrections reduced FRCN2 values closer to FRCpleth in health and reduced LCIN2 in both health and CF, but did not explain all of the differences observed between N2-dependent and -independent techniques. Use of earlier washout cut-offs could reduce the influence of tissue N2. Applying tissue N2 corrections to LCIN2 measurements did not significantly affect the interpretation of treatment effects reported in a previously published interventional trial. While tissue N2 excretion likely has an impact on MBWN2 outcomes, better understanding of the nature of this phenomenon is required before routine correction can be implemented into current MBWN2 protocols.