Successful renal transplantation despite low levels of donor-specific HLA class I antibody without IVIg or plasmapheresis.

We prospectively transplanted 10 primary kidney recipients with deceased donor organs (nine kidney and one pancreas/kidney) when their flow cytometric T-cell IgG, HLA class I donor-specific crossmatch was positive but the AHG T-cell crossmatch was negative, with a median follow-up of 1.8 yr. No pre- or peri-operative IVIg or plasmapheresis was administered to any patient. All but one of the 11 organs transplanted into patients with a flow T(+)/AHG(-) crossmatch is currently functioning despite the continued presence of circulating low levels of HLA class I antibody. Flow HLA class I antigen-coated beads showed the presence of at least one donor-specific HLA class I antibody at transplantation in each of the 10 cases. No rejections were observed in seven of the 10 cases (70%). Six rejection episodes, four cellular and two humoral, occurred in three patients. Each rejection was successfully treated. The only graft loss occurred in a kidney recipient on day 667 secondary to ischemia to the kidney because of cardiac surgery. Thus, short-term (one to two years) graft survival in primary transplants was not influenced by low levels of donor-specific HLA class I antibody present at transplantation and no prophylactic treatment such as IVIg, plasmapheresis, anti-CD20 or splenectomy was needed peri-operatively.

Flow cytometry beads rather than the antihuman globulin method should be used to detect HLA Class I IgG antibody (PRA) in cadaveric renal regraft candidates.

HLA Class I antibody screening can be performed by flow cytometry using a mixture of 30 distinct bead populations each coated with the Class I antigen phenotype derived from different cell lines. In this study we compared the efficacy of Class I antibody screens done by flow cytometry beads with the antihuman globulin (AHG) method for patients awaiting cadaveric renal retransplantation. Class I panel reactive antibody (PRA) screening by flow cytometric beads of 21 regraft serum samples that had all been found to be negative by AHG DTT Class I PRA, revealed that 57.1% (12 of 21) had a flow Class I PRA of > or = 10%. Furthermore, when five regraft sera with an intermediate PRA were screened (mean AHG DTT PRA = 33.2 +/- 13%) the mean flow Class I PRA almost doubled (mean flow PRA = 72.4 +/- 10.2%) (p < 0.01). When active UNOS waiting list regraft candidates, after several months of screening the Class I PRA by flow beads, were divided into the three PRA categories based on their peak flow Class I PRA value (0-20%, 21-79% and > or = 80%), the incidence of a positive flow cross-match was 0%, 72% and 85% and the incidence of retransplantation was 60%, 22% and 10%, in each of these groups, respectively. These data provided our histocompatibility laboratory with the rationale to stop performing the AHG PRA and perform only the flow Class I PRA method for regraft candidates.