Bluetooth Tactical Headsets Improve The Speed of Accurate Patient Handoffs.

BACKGROUND: The Committee on En Route Combat Casualty Care recently ranked the patient handoff as their fourth research priority. Bluetooth technology has been introduced to the battlefield and has the potential to improve the tactical patient handoff. The purpose of this study is to compare the traditional methods of communication used in tactical medical evacuation by Special Operations medical personnel (radio push-to-talk [PTT] and Tactical Medic Intercom System [TM-ICS]) to Bluetooth communication. METHODS: Twenty-four simulated tactical patient handoffs were performed to compare Bluetooth and traditional methods of communication used in tactical medical evacuation. Patient scenario order and method of communication were randomized. Accuracy and time required to complete the patient handoff were determined. The study took place using a rotary-wing aircraft kept at level 2 to simulate real-world background noise. Preferred method of communication for each study participant was determined. RESULTS: There were no differences in accuracy of the received patient handoffs between groups or patient handoff transmission times at the ramp of the aircraft. However, when comparing patient handoff times to the medical team within the aircraft, Bluetooth communication was significantly faster than both TM-ICS and radio PTT, while Bluetooth PTT and radio PTT were also significantly faster than TM-ICS. Bluetooth communication was ranked as the preferred method of handoff by all study participants. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that utilization of Bluetooth technology for patient handover results in faster handoffs compared with traditional methods without sacrificing any accuracy in a scenario with high levels of noise.

Cumulative Blast Exposure Estimate Model for Special Operations Forces Combat Soldiers.

Special Operations Forces (SOF) Service members endure frequent exposures to blast and overpressure mechanisms given their high training tempo. The link between cumulative subconcussive blasts on short- and long-term neurological impairment is largely understudied. Neurodegenerative diseases such as brain dysfunction, cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia may develop with chronic exposures. This hypothesis remains unproven because of lack of ecologically valid occupational blast exposure surveillance among SOF Service members. The purpose of the study was to measure occupational blast exposures in a close quarter battle (CQB) training environment and to use those outcomes to develop a pragmatic cumulative blast exposure (CBE) estimate model. Four blast silhouettes equipped with a field-deployable wireless blast gauge system were positioned in breaching positions during CQB training scenarios. Silhouettes were exposed to flashbangs and three interior breaching charges (single strand roll-up interior charge, 300 grain (gr) explosive cutting tape (ECT), and Jelly charge). Mean blast measures were calculated for each silhouette for flashbangs (n = 93), single strand roll-up interior charge (n = 80), 300 gr ECT (n = 28), and Jelly charge (n = 71). Mean peak blast pressures per detonation are reported as follows: (1) flashbangs (1.97 pounds per square inch [psi]); (2) single strand roll-up interior charge (3.88 psi); (3) 300 gr ECT (2.78 psi); and (4) Jelly charge (1.89 psi). Pragmatic CBE estimates for SOF Service members suggest 36.8 psi, 184 psi, and 2760 psi may represent daily, weekly, and training cycle cumulative pressure exposures. Estimating blast exposures during routine CQB training can be determined from empirical measures taken in CQB environments. Factoring in daily, weekly, training cycle, or even career length may reasonably estimate cumulative occupational training blast exposures for SOF Service members. Future work may permit more granular exposure estimates based on operational blast exposures and those experienced by other military occupational specialties.