Improved left ventricular performance during exercise with verapamil or nifedipine in patients with chronic stable angina.

To examine the effects of chronic oral therapy with verapamil, 120 mg three times a day, and nifedipine, 20 mg four times daily, on left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion at rest and exercise, 10 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris underwent serial rest and exercise radionuclide angiography. Pre drug control study revealed a resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 0.62 +/- 0.08, falling to 0.54 +/- 0.12 at peak exercise (p less than 0.05). Wall motion score deteriorated from a resting value of 13.8 +/- 2.3 to 10.6 +/- 1.8 (p less than 0.01) with exercise. Patients were subsequently randomized to verapamil or nifedipine for 4 weeks each in an open-labeled crossover design. Rest and exercise radionuclide angiography were repeated at the end of each 4-week period. Neither verapamil nor nifedipine had a significant effect on resting LVEF (verapamil LVEF = 0.61 +/- 0.10, nifedipine LVEF = 0.64 +/- 0.02). Likewise, they had no significant effect on resting wall motion score (verapamil = 14.2 +/- 2.2, nifedipine = 14.4 +/- 1.6). Both verapamil and nifedipine significantly increased LVEF at peak exercise (verapamil = 0.63 +/- 0.09, nifedipine = 0.65 +/- 0.08, p less than 0.05 vs pre drug control) and improved peak exercise wall motion score (verapamil = 13 +/- 1.9, nifedipine = 13.8 +/- 1.6, p less than 0.05 vs pre drug control). Both drugs significantly reduced maximal ST depression at peak exercise and prolonged exercise duration. Episodes of angina and nitroglycerin use were also significantly reduced. In summary, verapamil and nifedipine improved left ventricular performance at exercise in patients with angina pectoris.

Effect of long-term administration of digoxin on exercise performance in chronic airflow obstruction.

We have studied the effect of long-term digoxin on exercise performance in 15 patients with pulmonary heart disease due to severe chronic airflow obstruction (FEV1/VC ratio 29 +/- 6%: mean +/- SD). Digoxin (0.25 mg/day) was given for 8 weeks in a randomized, double-blind crossover, placebo-controlled trial. All patients were ambulatory and had clinical features of right ventricular dysfunction but no clinical evidence of left ventricular dysfunction. Assessments included progressive and steady-state exercise, pulmonary function studies and evaluation of right and left ventricular function. In all patients the right ventricular ejection fraction was reduced; in 4 patients the left ventricular ejection fraction was also reduced. In patients whose left ventricular ejection fraction was initially abnormal, 8 weeks of digoxin increased left ventricular ejection fraction to normal. In spite of the improvement in resting ventricular function, exercise performance, the cardiopulmonary response to exercise, pulmonary function and general health status did not improve. We conclude that in patients with pulmonary heart disease: 1) digoxin improves ventricular function only if left ventricular function is reduced, and 2) despite the improvement in ventricular function digoxin does not improve pulmonary function, cardiopulmonary response to exercise or general feeling of well being.

Effect of diuretics on cardiopulmonary performance in severe chronic airflow obstruction. A controlled clinical trial.

In a randomized, controlled trial, ten patients with pulmonary heart disease due to severe chronic airflow obstruction were stratified into two groups: group 1 had clinical features of congestive heart failure during respiratory failure and were regularly receiving diuretics; group 2 had no such clinical features and were not receiving diuretics. In group 1, when placebo was substituted for diuretics, pulmonary edema developed in three patients; exercise performance and ventricular function of the remaining two patients deteriorated. In group 2, there was no difference in exercise tolerance or ventricular function between placebo and diuretic therapy. The clinical deterioration in group 1 was related to abnormal left ventricular function. Thus, diuretics benefit only patients who have clinical features of congestive heart failure. In patients with isolated abnormal right ventricular function, diuretics may be harmful.

Effect of digoxin on right ventricular function in severe chronic airflow obstruction. A controlled clinical trial.

The effect of digoxin on the right and left ventricular ejection fractions in 15 patients with pulmonary heart disease caused by severe chronic airflow obstruction was studied in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. All patients were ambulatory and had clinical features of right but not left ventricular dysfunction. Equilibrium radionuclide angiography showed reduced right ventricular ejection fraction in all patients and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in four. After 8 weeks of digoxin treatment, the abnormal left ventricular ejection fractions were normal; right ventricular ejection fractions increased only in those patients who had had abnormal left ventricular ejection fractions. We conclude that in patients with pulmonary heart disease, the right ventricular ejection fraction is abnormal and improves with digoxin treatment only when the left ventricular ejection fraction also is initially abnormal.