Erratum: 404 Mechanisms of a Dynamic Stability Protocol for Persons with Thumb Osteoarthritis - CORRIGENDUM.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.351.].

Psychometric properties of body structures and functions measures in non-surgical thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of treatment outcomes and change in health status over time is a critical component of clinical practice and research for people with osteoarthritis. Numerous clinical tools are used to assess the structures and function of the thumb in persons with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis however their psychometrics have not yet been systematically explored. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of clinical tools used in persons with non-surgical thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis to objectively measure thumb structures and function, evaluate the quality of such studies, and subsequently make clinical and future research recommendations. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic search and screening was conducted across nine databases. Original research published between 2002 and 2022 that involved the assessment of psychometric properties (validity, reliability, precision, responsiveness, sensitivity, specificity, and minimal clinically important difference) of clinical tools were included. Sample characteristics, methods, and psychometric findings from each study were compiled. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments' checklist. Two independent researchers screened articles and assessed methodological quality and when not in agreement, a third party was consulted. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the review. The mean age of all participants in the studies was 69 years of age. The study designs included prospective case-control, prospective cohort, and cross-sectional to determine the psychometric properties of the measurements and tools. The included studies examined techniques to assess range of motion, strength, and pain-pressure thresholds, and screen for arthritis (ie, provocative tests). The intermetacarpal distance method, Kapandji index, pain-pressure threshold test, and pain-free grip and pinch dynamometry demonstrate excellent reliability and acceptable precision. Metacarpal extension, adduction, and pressure-shear provocative tests have superior sensitivity and specificity and the extension and adduction tests have excellent reliability. Other assessments included in the review yielded less robust psychometric properties. Studies were of variable methodological quality spanning from inadequate to very good. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available literature on the psychometric properties of assessments of body structures and functions in persons with non-operative thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis, we offer a limited set of recommendations for use when screening for arthritis symptomology and measuring hand strength, thumb mobility, and pain thresholds. Additional psychometric research is needed in these domains as well as in dexterity, sensation, and objective measures of hand function. Future research should employ best practices in psychometric research.

Assessment and treatment of nonsurgical thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: A modified Delphi-based consensus paper of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

BACKGROUND: While the literature is abundant on hand therapy assessment and treatment of nonsurgical thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA), clarity and uniformity are meager, making it a desirable diagnosis to establish expert consensus. PURPOSE: This study aimed to ascertain if consensus exists for the assessment and treatment of nonsurgical management of thumb CMC OA in the hand therapy clinical setting. STUDY DESIGN: This was a consensus paper via the modified Delphi approach. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to determine consensus among an expert panel, including hand therapists and hand surgeons, via two online surveys. A consensus paper steering committee (from the American Society of Hand Therapist's research division) designed the surveys and analyzed responses. Consensus was established as 75% agreement among the expert panel. Demographic information was collected from the expert panel. RESULTS: The expert panel included 34 hand therapists and seven hand surgeons. The survey response rates were 93.6% for the first survey and 90.2% for the second survey. Consensus recommendations were classified according to the World Health Organization categorization. These included evaluating the body structures for clinical signs/clinical testing and body functions for pain, range of motion for palmar abduction, radial abduction, opposition, and thumb metacarpal phalangeal flexion/extension, and grip and tripod pinch strength. Further consensus recommendations were for the assessment of function using a region-specific, upper extremity patient-reported outcome measure (activity and participation), environmental factors, outcome expectation, and illness perception within the patient's unique environmental and social contexts. Treatment recommendations included the use of an orthosis during painful activities, a dynamic stability program (stable C posture, release of tight adductors, and strengthening of stabilizers), patient education, joint protection techniques, adaptive equipment, and functional-based intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The findings describe the consensus of a group of experts and provide a clinical reference tool on the hand therapy assessment and treatment of nonsurgical thumb CMC joint OA.

Test-retest Reliability and Precision of the Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability and precision of Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer (RIHM) in healthy adults. METHODS: Twenty-nine participants originally recruited via convenience sampling at a Midwestern state fair returned approximately 8 days later for retest. An average of three trials for each of the five intrinsic hand strength measurements were collected using the same technique that was used during initial testing. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient or ICC(2,3) and precision was evaluated using the standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change (MDC90)/MDC%. RESULTS: Across all measures of intrinsic strength, the RIHM and its standardized procedures had excellent test-retest reliability. Index finger metacarpophalangeal flexion demonstrated the lowest reliability, and right small finger abduction, left thumb carpometacarpal abduction, and index finger metacarpophalangeal abduction tests had the highest reliability. Precision, as evidenced by SEM and MDC values, was excellent for tests of left index and bilateral small finger abduction strength and acceptable for all other measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Test-retest reliability and precision of RIHM across all measurements was excellent. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings indicate that RIHM is a reliable and precise tool in measuring intrinsic strength of hands of healthy adults, although further research is needed in clinical populations.

Adjusting our sails to the storm: The resiliency of hand therapists.

Our profession now faces unprecedented challenges. The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have been acutely catastrophic and the uncertainty of the effects of value-based healthcare also raises concerns. However, while the state of the world as we know it is turbulent and uncertain, our profession has a long-standing history of resilience, can weather this storm, and has great potential to thrive. The purpose of this lecture is to highlight the profession's history of resilience, feature the many commendable and resilient acts of hand therapists, explore the traits of adaptable people, and offer perspectives on how we, as individuals and a profession, might "adjust our sails" and navigate our way to a stronger presence, improved practices, and unparalleled outcomes.

Characterizing response to a dynamic stability modeled approach for thumb carpometacarpal joint pain: A retrospective study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. INTRODUCTION: Literature trends indicate that thumb dynamic stabilization may benefit clients with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint pain and arthritis. There is minimal research investigating whether client characteristics predict responsiveness to hand therapy for thumb dynamic stabilization. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: 1) To investigate how adults with thumb CMC joint pain responded to a hand therapy dynamic stabilization modeled intervention. 2) To determine if various client factors influenced responsiveness and to what extent. METHODS: An electronic medical record search identified adults treated from August 2009 through December 2015 for thumb CMC joint pain. Radiographs were retrospectively staged. Outcome measures were 1) Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) total disability score and 2) Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Paired t-tests were performed to compare pre and post treatment measures. Multivariate analyses were used to investigate predictive factors. RESULTS: A total of 249 charts were analyzed. Large overall significant effects were noted for disability score (QuickDASH P <.001, X = 12.1, Cohen's d = 0.9). The average improvement of 2.1 (SD = 2.6) points exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 1.7 points on the NPRS pain scale. Significant predictors of QuickDASH Scores were radiographic staging, bilateral hand involvement and initial pain ratings. Significant predictors for change in pain scores (meeting or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference for the NPRS) were bilateral thumb involvement and initial "pain at worst" rating. CONCLUSION: After completing hand therapy with a dynamic stabilization approach, clients had less pain and disability. Those who had unilateral thumb pain, or those who started with higher pain levels were most likely to have clinically meaningful improvements in pain. Clients in early CMC osteoarthritis (OA) stages responded better than those in later stages, indicating that early referral to therapy is important.

Thumb carpometacarpal palmar and radial abduction in adults with thumb carpometacarpal joint pain: Inter-rater reliability and precision of the inter-metacarpal distance method.

STUDY DESIGN: Psychometric study of inter-rater reliability. INTRODUCTION: Functional use of the thumb can be limited in individuals with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis(OA), especially in the presence of a thumb adduction contracture. Goniometry is a common method of assessing palmar and radial abduction of the thumb base and can be used as a method of determining effectiveness of an intervention for adduction contracture. However, goniometry for the assessment of these motions has been shown to have low to moderate reliability. The intermetacarpal distance (IMD) measurement method has been shown to be the most reliable for measuring CMC palmar abduction in individuals with healthy hands but has not been studied in persons with thumb CMC OA. PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability and precision of the inter-metacarpal distance method for measuring palmar and radial abduction in persons with symptoms of thumb CMC OA. METHODS: Two trained hand therapists utilized the IMD method to measure palmar and radial abduction in the affected hands of 22 subjects (28 thumbs) with a physician-confirmed diagnosis or positive provocative test consistent with a diagnosis of thumb CMC OA. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,2) was used to assess inter-rater reliability of the IMD method. To determine the precision of the measurements, the standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and MDC percent were calculated. Findings were supplemented with descriptive data on the IMD values as well as descriptive data on the sample. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients for both radial and palmar abduction were found to be >.75, indicating excellent reliability. The precision of the IMD measurements were acceptable-to-excellent as evidenced by MDC% values of <30% and <10% for radial and palmar abduction respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We present a new method for measuring thumb radial abduction. The inter-metacarpal distance method has excellent inter-rater reliability and acceptable-to-excellent precision when measuring palmar and radial abduction in individuals with or suspected to have thumb CMC OA. Currently, it is the most reliable tool for measuring thumb abduction.

Concurrent validity and precision of the thumb disability examination (TDX) in first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis.

STUDY DESIGN: A descriptive psychometric study of precision and concurrent validity of the Thumb Disability Examination (TDX). INTRODUCTION: Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC OA) is a painful joint condition impacting the functionality of the hand. Therapists use patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate change in disability and symptomology in response to interventions. The TDX is the only condition-specific outcome measure for persons with thumb CMC OA. Its responsiveness, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity with the DASH are published, yet it's precision and concurrent validity with a hand-region-specific tool has not yet been established. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: We aimed to determine the precision and concurrent validity of the TDX with a region-specific outcome measure in people with thumb CMC OA. METHODS: Sixteen individuals with a medical diagnosis of CMC OA or a positive pressure-shear test completed the TDX across two visits and the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (bMHQ) at the initial visit. The second visit was 7 to 21 days after the first. Self-administration of the TDX and bMHQ were observed by a licensed occupational therapist. RESULTS: Across total and subscale scores of the TDX, standard error of measurement (SEM) values are used to indicate the precision of tool and demonstrate how confident a user can be that change in score exceeds the error inherent to the tool. Minimal detectable change percentage (MDC%) values for the TDX are acceptable (<30%). The TDX demonstrated high concurrent validity with the bMHQ (rs = -0.733; P = .001). DISCUSSION: Precision of the TDX is acceptable and the concurrent validity of the TDX with a commonly used region-specific scale is high. The study was limited by a small, demographically homogeneous sample due to difficulty in recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: The TDX is a precise and valid outcome measure for individuals having a clinical diagnosis or indications of having thumb CMC OA.

Reliability and validity of a novel instrument for the quantification of hand forces during a jar opening task.

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical Measurement INTRODUCTION: Jar opening is a task that relies heavily on the ability to generate adequate hand forces and is often reported in the literature as being difficult for women with hand arthritis. Many have studied relationships between diminished grip/pinch strength and occupational performance but few have investigated how much hand force is necessary to successfully engage in manual tasks. Those who studied this have relied on approaches and tools which lack ecology. Additionally, few have instrumented daily objects to understand if joint protection techniques do, in fact, reduce the hand force generation when performing manual tasks. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The objectives of this study were to one) determine the within session repeatability of a device used to quantify these forces and two) probe into the ecological validity of a novel device to be used in the future study of women with hand osteoarthritis to measure hand force requirements and study the impact of joint protection interventions on hand force profiles. METHODS: A plastic jar was instrumented with a torque limiter, 6-axis load cell, and six force sensing resistors so as to capture the grip and compressive hand forces which act on a jar lid when opening a sealed jar. To assess intra-rater reliability of the tool and its testing procedures, 31 adult women with hand osteoarthritis were asked untwist the jar's lid so as to break its seal with each hand twice while stabilizing the base with the opposing hand. The agreement between trials of peak forces and torques from each hand was assessed through statistical approaches including Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Standard Error of the Measurement, and Minimal Detectable Change. The jar's ecological validity was then assessed via survey. RESULTS: This instrument and methods yielded good to excellent repeatability across all force outputs. The majority of our subjects (87%) reported the jar to be similar to those used at home, 87% reported to use a similar jar 2-3 times/month or greater, and rated the importance of opening such a jar as being, on average, 8.7/10. DISCUSSION: The jar instrument appears to have high reliability and ecologic validity. It has the potential to reveal hand force requirements for a population known to have difficulties opening jars and understanding these force thresholds could help to inform therapy goal-setting. Beyond this, it has the potential to support the study of the hand forces used across various joint protection approaches so as to inform best "jar-opening" practices. CONCLUSIONS: This tool was designed to represent the qualities of a standard, large sealed jar while still housing sophisticated kinetic measurement capacities. Our findings support that we have presented a tool which can be used in future study within this population to better understand the hand kinetics associated with the highly problematic task of jar-opening and joint protection strategies intended to reduce hand loads.

Age- and gender-stratified adult myometric reference values of isometric intrinsic hand strength.

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive normative. INTRODUCTION: Intrinsic hand strength can be impacted by hand arthritis, peripheral nerve injuries, and spinal cord injuries. Grip dynamometry does not isolate intrinsic strength, and manual muscle testing is not sensitive to change in grades 4 and 5. The Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer is a reliable and valid test of intrinsic hand strength; however, no adult normative data are available. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To describe age- and gender-stratified intrinsic hand strength norms in subjects aged 21 years and above and to determine if factors known to predict grip dynamometry also predict measures of intrinsic hand strength. METHODS: Three trials of 5 measures of maximal isometric intrinsic strength were performed bilaterally by 607 "healthy-handed" adult males and females. Average strength values were stratified by age and gender. Data were analyzed to determine the influence of demographic and anthropometric variables on intrinsic strength. RESULTS: Intrinsic strength generally followed age and gender trends similar to grip dynamometry. Age, gender, body mass index, and the interaction between gender and body mass index were predictors of intrinsic strength, whereas in most cases, the hand being tested did not predict the intrinsic strength. DISCUSSION: With the addition of these findings, age- and gender-stratified hand intrinsic strength norms now span from age 4 through late adulthood. Many factors known to predict grip dynamometry also predict intrinsic myometry. Additional research is needed to evaluate the impact of vocational and avocational demands on intrinsic strength. CONCLUSIONS: These norms can be referenced to evaluate and plan hand therapy and surgical interventions for intrinsic weakness.

Graded motor imagery for women at risk for developing type I CRPS following closed treatment of distal radius fractures: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRF) account for nearly one-fifth of all fractures in older adults, and women experience them 5× as often as men. Most DRF occur with low impact injuries to the wrist with an outstretched hand, and are often managed via closed treatment and cast immobilization. Women sustaining a DRF are at risk for upper limb immobility, sensorimotor changes, edema and type I complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Since CRPS onset is likely influenced by alterations in the brain's somatosensory region, a rehabilitation intervention, Graded Motor Imagery (GMI), aims to restore cortical representation, including sensory and motor function, of the affected limb. To date, there are no studies on the use of GMI in reducing risk of or preventing the onset of type I CRPS in women with DRF treated with cast immobilization. Due to a higher likelihood of women with this injury developing type I CRPS, it is important to early intervention is needed. METHODS/DESIGN: This article describes a six-week randomized comparative effectiveness trial, where the outcomes of a modified GMI program (mGMI) + standard of care (SOC) group (n = 33) are compared to a SOC only control group (n = 33). Immediately following cast immobilization, both groups participate in four 1-h clinic-based sessions, and a home program for 10 min three times daily until cast removal. Blinded assessments occur within 1 week of cast immobilization (baseline), at three weeks post cast immbolization, cast removal, and at three months post cast removal. The primary outcomes are patient reported wrist/hand function and symptomology on the Patient Rated Wristand Hand Evaluation, McGill Pain Questionnaire, and Budapest CRPS Criteria. The secondary outcomes are grip strength, active range of motion as per goniometry, circumferential edema measurements, and joint position sense. DISCUSSION: This study will investigate the early effects of mGMI + SOC hand therapy compared to SOC alone. We intend to investigate whether an intervention, specifically mGMI, used to treat preexisiting pain and motor dysfunction might also be used to mitigate these problems prior to their onset. If positive effects are observed, mGMI + SOC may be considered for incorporation into early rehabilitation program. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT02957240 (Approval date: April 20, 2017).

Measuring intrinsic hand strength in healthy adults: The accuracy intrarater and inter-rater reliability of the Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer.

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical measurement study. INTRODUCTION: Measuring the isometric strength generated during isolated hand joint motions is a challenging feat. The Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer (RIHM; med.engineers, Rotterdam, Netherlands) permits measurement of isolated movements of the hand. To date, there is limited evidence on the inter-rater reliability and limited adult normative data of RIHM. Given that multiple raters, often with varying degrees of experience, are needed to collect normative data, inter-rater reliability testing and a comparison of novice and experienced raters are needed. PURPOSES OF THE STUDY: The purposes of this study were to test the accuracy, intrarater reliability, and inter-rater reliability of the RIHM in healthy-handed adults. METHODS: RIHM accuracy was tested through use of precision class F weights. Adults 18 years or older without upper limb dysfunction were recruited. Each participant was tested by 4 raters, 3 occupational therapy graduate students, and an experienced certified hand therapist, through use of a calibrated RIHM. Five strength measures were tested bilaterally (ie, thumb carpometacarpal palmar abduction, index finger metacarpophalangeal [MP] abduction, index finger MP flexion, thumb MP flexion, and small finger MP abduction) 3 times per a standardized protocol. Statistical methods were used to test accuracy, inter-rater reliability, and intrarater/response stability. RESULTS: The accuracy of RIHM device error was 5% or less. Reliability testing included the participation of 19 women and 10 men (n = 29). All raters were in excellent agreement across all muscles (intraclass correlation coefficient, ≥0.81). Low standard error of measurement values of ≤8.3 N (1.9 lb) across raters were found. The response stability and/or intrarater reliability of the novice and certified hand therapist raters were not statistically different. DISCUSSION: The RIHM has an acceptable instrument error; the RIHM and its standardized procedure have excellent inter-rater reliability and response stability when testing those without hand limitations; and the response stability and/or intrarater reliability of expert and novice raters were consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the RIHM is justified when multiple raters of varying expertise collect normative data or conduct cohort studies on persons with healthy hands. Future research is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.

Reference values of intrinsic muscle strength of the hand of adolescents and young adults.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional clinical measurement study. INTRODUCTION: Measuring intrinsic hand muscle strength helps evaluate hand function or therapeutic outcomes. However, there are no established normative values in adolescents and young adults between 13 and 20 years of age. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To measure hand intrinsic muscle strength and identify associated factors that may influence such in adolescents and young adults through use of the Rotterdam intrinsic hand myometer. METHODS: A total of 131 participants (male: 63; female: 68) between 13 and 20 years of age completed the strength measurements of abductor pollicis brevis, first dorsal interosseus (FDI), deep head of FDI and lumbrical of second digit, flexor pollicis brevis (FPB), and abductor digiti minimi. Two trials of the measurements of each muscle were averaged for analyses. Self-reported demographic data were used to examine the influences of age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) on intrinsic hand muscle strength. RESULTS: Normative values of intrinsic hand muscle strength were presented by age groups (13, 14, 15-16, 17-18, 19-20 year olds) for each sex category (male, female). A main effect of sex, but not age, on all the muscles on both the dominant (FPB: P = .02, others: P < .001) and non-dominant (FDI: P = .005, FPB: P = .01, others: P < .001) sides was found. A significant effect of BMI was found on dominant (P = .009) and non-dominant abductor pollicis brevis (P = .002). In addition, FDI (P = .005) and FPB (P = .002) were stronger on the dominant side than the non-dominant side. DISCUSSION: Intrinsic hand muscle strength may be influenced by different factors including sex, BMI, and hand dominance. A larger sample is needed to rigorously investigate the influence of age on intrinsic strength in male and female adolescents and young adults. CONCLUSION: The results provide reference values and suggest factors to be considered when evaluating hand function and therapeutic outcomes in both clinical and research settings. Further study is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: VI.

Development, construct validity, and reproducibility of a mimetic sealed jar measuring the dynamics of opening.

Measurement of the dynamic kinetics involved in opening a jar may enable health care professionals to understand and train individuals in optimal hand/grip mechanics. This technical note details the design, validity, and reproducibility testing of a mimetic jar capable of measuring the forces and moments and isolated digital forces applied to the lid of the jar. An ecological jar instrument was designed with a torque limiter to provide a natural opening mechanism while a six-axis load cell and force sensing resistors recorded the way individuals applied force to the jar and lid during opening of a sealed container. A total of 115 volunteers participated in a validation of the device and an additional 36 participated in repeatability testing. Compared with prior instruments, this mimetic jar provides more force data and a simulated opening experience - making this jar instrument unique. Future studies utilizing the jar designed herein may allow health care professionals to evaluate patients suffering from debilitating osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia or other neuromuscular conditions and offer improvement strategies.

Evaluation of Hand Forces During a Joint-Protection Strategy for Women With Hand Osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether a joint-protection strategy changes the mechanics of opening a sealed jar. METHOD: Thirty-one adult women with hand osteoarthritis attempted to open a "sealed" jar instrument when using and not using nonskid material. Grip force, torque, success, and pain were recorded for each trial. RESULTS: Participants used less grip force when twisting with their left hand. The greatest torque and success, yet the least amount of grip force across time, and pain was noted when the left hand turned the lid, the jar was held vertically, the right hand supported the base, and nonskid material was used. CONCLUSION: Women with hand osteoarthritis should be educated to consider the hand they use and their approach when opening sealed jars. Use of nonskid material without additional reasoning may increase load on arthritic joints, pain, and dysfunction. Additional research on task kinematics and the kinetics of the stabilizing hand is needed.