Comparing school environments with and without legislation for the prevention and management of anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: School personnel in contact with students with life-threatening allergies often lack necessary supports, creating a potentially dangerous situation. Sabrina's Law, the first legislation in the world designed to protect such children, requires all Ontario public schools to have a plan to protect children at risk. Although it has captured international attention, the differences a legislative approach makes have not been identified. Our study compared the approaches to anaphylaxis prevention and management in schools with and without legislation. METHODS: Legislated (Ontario) and nonlegislated (Alberta, British Columbia, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Quebec) environments were compared. School board anaphylaxis policies were assessed for consistency with Canadian anaphylaxis guidelines. Parents of at-risk children and school personnel were surveyed to determine their perspectives on school practices. School personnel's EpiPen5 technique was assessed. RESULTS: Consistency of school board policies with anaphylaxis guidelines was significantly better in a legislated environment (P=0.009). Parents in a legislated environment reported more comprehensive anaphylaxis emergency forms (P<0.001), while school personnel in nonlegislated environments reported more comprehensive forms (P=0.004). Despite school personnel in both environments receiving EpiPen5 training (>80%), suboptimal technique was commonly observed. However, school personnel in the legislated environment had better technique (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that school boards in legislated environments have made greater efforts to support students at risk for anaphylaxis compared to nonlegislated environments. However, significant gaps exist in both environments, especially with respect to EpiPen5 administration, content, and distribution of anaphylaxis emergency forms, and awareness of school procedures by school personnel and parents.

Factors associated with poor asthma control in children aged five to 13 years.

BACKGROUND: Most children with asthma should be able to achieve acceptable control. However, are there differences between those with acceptable and poor control, and if so, how can health care approaches be modified accordingly? OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics of elementary school children aged five to 13 years with acceptable and poor levels of asthma control. METHODS: The present cross-sectional study of children with asthma used five indicators of control, as outlined by the Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, to categorize acceptable and poor asthma control. RESULTS: Of 153 children, 115 (75%) were rated as having poorly controlled asthma. Of those with poor control, 65 (64%) children were currently using inhaled corticosteroids, and 65% of those reported using inhaled corticosteroids daily versus as needed. Fifty-one per cent of the children with poorly controlled asthma had exposure to tobacco smoke, whereas 79% of the children with asthma under acceptable control were from households with no smokers (P=0.002). The poor control group also had significantly worse parental perceptions of the psychosocial impact of asthma on their child. No significant difference was found in the percentage of those who had written action plans in the poor control group (28%) compared with the acceptable control group (26%), and similar percentages in each group stated that they used the plans. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high use of inhaled corticosteroids, the majority of children had poorly controlled asthma. The poor control group had more exposure to tobacco smoke and a worse psychosocial impact due to asthma. Few children had past asthma education and action plans, suggesting that there is a need to improve access to and tools for education.

The epidemiology of childhood asthma in Red Deer and Medicine Hat, Alberta.

OBJECTIVES: To document the prevalence of asthma among school-aged children in two Alberta communities, to understand host and indoor environmental factors associated with asthma, and to compare these factors between the two communities. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study with a nested, case-control follow-up. SETTING: Red Deer and Medicine Hat, Alberta. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to families of children aged five to 19 years in Red Deer (n=5292) and Medicine Hat (n=5372) to identify children with current asthma. A random sample of 592 children with current asthma and 443 with no history of asthma constituted a case-control population; they were followed up by telephone to obtain responses to the European Respiratory Health Survey and, in children with current asthma, the Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire. RESULTS: Cross-sectional response rates were 84% and 73% for Red Deer and Medicine Hat, respectively. The prevalence of asthma was higher in Medicine Hat (17.0%) than in Red Deer (12.8%). In the follow-up study, factors associated with the presence of asthma were parental asthma or allergies, number of siblings, presence of cats, serious respiratory illnesses before five years of age, sex, age, presence of mould and/or mildew and use of a gas cooking stove. The presence of mould and/or mildew was a significant risk factor in Red Deer but not in Medicine Hat. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma prevalence among school children in Red Deer was consistent with recently published Canadian data; the prevalence in Medicine Hat was higher than expected, especially given the low relative humidity. Risk factor data are consistent with other studies in that parental asthma, especially maternal asthma, was a significant predictor of childhood asthma. Cats in the house (both communities) and environmental tobacco smoke (Medicine Hat only) were significantly less common among children with asthma, suggesting that preventive actions may have been taken in the homes of some children with asthma.

The "Roaring Adventures of Puff": a childhood asthma education program.

The "Roaring Adventures of Puff" (RAP) is a childhood asthma education program that targets children 7 to 12 years of age and their families. This program is designed to improve the quality of life of these children and improve asthma management for optimal asthma control. The program uses interactive educational strategies based on the principles of the Social Cognitive Theory. The article highlights aspects of the theory, provides an overview of the RAP program, and outlines some of the practical components of the program. RAP is an innovative program that is adaptable to a variety of settings and may serve as a health education model for children.