Differences in sphere-forming cells from keratoconic and normal corneal tissue: Implications for keratoconus pathogenesis.

Keratoconus is primarily an anterior corneal disorder of unclear aetiology. Stem cells may play a role in the perpetuation of keratoconus, although this has yet to be definitively established. Sphere-forming cells from normal human donor corneas have previously been shown to be a heterogenous mix of epithelial, stromal, stem and progenitor cell components which have potential for treatment of corneal dystrophies. Our work set out to isolate and characterise sphere-forming cells from human keratoconic tissue. Keratoconic donor corneas were successfully used to culture sphere-forming cells in vitro. Time lapse imaging of these spheres on a collagen surface over 8 days revealed keratoconic spheres lack the ability to maintain a central core and have diminished ability to repopulate the surface. Immunocytochemistry showed positive labelling for the stem cell marker 'Adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette sub-family B member 5 (ABCB5)' indicating stem cell retention and the myofibroblast marker alpha smooth muscle actin indicating wound repair while droplet digital Polymerase Chain Reaction confirmed an increase in expression of stem and stromal cell markers in keratoconic spheres compared to spheres cultured from normal donors at day 7 post-placement. Keratoconic sphere-forming cells showed a diminished repopulation ability, a faster wound healing response and lack of central core retention. These results suggest stem cells in keratoconus may be in an elevated state of wound repair and unable to respond appropriately to further injury in corneal maintenance. Sphere forming cell populations in keratoconus appear to be different to those isolated from normal corneas and this may be an important consideration in unearthing keratoconus aetiology.

Implantation of Human Peripheral Corneal Spheres into Cadaveric Human Corneal Tissue.

Stem and progenitor cells isolated from human limbal tissue can be cultured in vitro as spheres. These spheres have potential for use as transplantable elements for the repopulation of corneal tissue ( Mathan et al., 2016 ). Herein we describe the detailed protocol for the implantation of human corneal spheres into cadaveric human corneal tissue. This protocol describes the procedure for sphere formation and culture, preparation of tissue for sphere implantation, corneal limbus microsurgery and sphere implantation.

Sphere-forming cells from peripheral cornea demonstrate the ability to repopulate the ocular surface.

BACKGROUND: The limbus forms the outer rim of the cornea at the corneoscleral junction and harbours a population of stem cells for corneal maintenance. Injuries to the limbus, through disease or accidents such as chemical injuries or burns, may lead to significant visual impairment due to depletion of the native stem cells of the tissue. METHODS: Sphere-forming cells were isolated from peripheral cornea for potential use as transplantable elements for limbal stem cell repopulation and limbal reconstruction. Immunocytochemistry, live cell imaging and quantitative PCR were used to characterize spheres and elucidate activity post implantation into human cadaveric corneal tissue. RESULTS: Spheres stained positively for stem cell markers ∆NP63α, ABCG2 and ABCB5 as well as the basal limbal marker and putative niche marker, notch 1. In addition, spheres also stained positively for markers of corneal cells, vimentin, keratin 3, keratocan and laminin, indicating a heterogeneous mix of stromal and epithelial-origin cells. Upon implantation into decellularized corneoscleral tissue, 3D, polarized and radially orientated cell migration with cell proliferation was observed. Cells migrated out from the spheres and repopulated the entire corneal surface over 14 days. Post-implantation analysis revealed qualitative evidence of stem, stromal and epithelial cell markers while quantitative PCR showed a quantitative reduction in keratocan and laminin expression indicative of an enhanced progenitor cell response. Proliferation, quantified by PCNA expression, significantly increased at 4 days subsequently followed by a decrease at day 7 post implantation. CONCLUSION: These observations suggest great promise for the potential of peripheral corneal spheres as transplantable units for corneal repair, targeting ocular surface regeneration and stem cell repopulation.

Comparison of stem cell properties in cell populations isolated from human central and limbal corneal epithelium.

PURPOSE: The limbus of the cornea is said to be the niche for limbal stem cells (LSCs) and the primary source of corneal epithelial maintenance. Previously, we aimed to have shown that central human epithelial cells are capable of corneal regeneration after wounding. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether central epithelial cells in human corneas have LSC properties. METHODS: Human corneal epithelial cells were separated from the central cornea and the limbus. Isolated cells were collected for sphere-forming assay, and spheres formed subsequently were analyzed using immunohistochemistry. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) was also used to analyze epithelial cells from central cornea, limbal rim, older donors, younger donors, and dissociated spheres. These analyses were based on cell size and Hoechst 33342 dye efflux ability, and side populations and non-side populations were isolated for colony growth measurement and sphere-forming assay. RESULTS: Human central and limbal epithelial cells were capable of forming spheres, in a 1:2 ratio, that were positive for p63 immunolabeling. In FACS, central and limbal epithelial cells showed no significant difference in cell size and dye efflux ability. There were almost 10 times more large cells with good dye efflux ability from younger donors than from older donors, and the gated side population showed more than 4 times faster rate of colony growth than the non-side population. Dissociated sphere cells, however, did not follow a similar pattern to tissue-derived cells using FACS analysis. In these, there were more than twice as many large cells than small cells with good dye efflux ability. CONCLUSIONS: Both limbal and central epithelial cells are capable of forming spheres in cultures that have stem cell properties. Central and limbal epithelial cells cannot be differentiated using FACS, but younger donor tissues give rise to greater numbers of large cells with high dye efflux. Therefore, results indicate that human central corneal epithelium contains cells with stem/progenitor properties, and these stem properties decline with age.