Focused assessment with sonography for trauma exam for diagnosis of pericardial effusion in penetrating thoracic trauma - A retrospective review from a level 1 trauma center.

INTRODUCTION: Point of care ultrasound has long been used in the trauma setting for rapid assessment and diagnosis of critically ill patients. Its utility for diagnosis of pericardial effusion in the setting of penetrating thoracic trauma has more recently been a topic of consideration, given the rapid decompensation that these patients can experience. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify the diagnostic accuracy of point of care ultrasound in the diagnosis of pericardial effusion among patients with penetrating thoracic trauma. METHODS: Retrospective review of 2099 patients brought to the trauma bay between the years 2016 and 2021 were analyzed for diagnosis of pericardial effusion. Patients who were diagnosed with a pericardial effusion were investigated for point of care ultrasound findings. Descriptive statistics were performed to identify sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. RESULTS: Prevalence was calculated to be 26.7 cases of pericardial effusion per 1000 patients presenting with penetrating thoracic trauma. Incidence was estimated to be 3.8 cases of pericardial effusion per 1000 person-years. Calculation of diagnostic capabilities of ED POCUS revealed a sensitivity of 96.36 â€‹%, a specificity of 100 â€‹%, PPV of 100 â€‹%, and NPV of 99.90 â€‹%. CONCLUSIONS: Point of Care cardiac ultrasonography is a reliable tool for the rapid diagnosis of pericardial effusion in penetrating thoracic trauma patients. Patients with ultrasound suggestive of this condition should receive rapid surgical management to prevent decompensation.

Every minute matters: Improving outcomes for penetrating trauma through prehospital advanced resuscitative care.

INTRODUCTION: Prehospital resuscitation with blood products is gaining popularity for patients with traumatic hemorrhage. The MEDEVAC trial demonstrated a survival benefit exclusively among patients who received blood or plasma within 15 minutes of air medical evacuation. In fast-paced urban EMS systems with a high incidence of penetrating trauma, mortality data based on the timing to first blood administration is scarce. We hypothesize a survival benefit in patients with severe hemorrhage when blood is administered within the first 15 minutes of EMS patient contact. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of prehospital blood (PHB) administration between 2021 and 2023 in an urban EMS system facing increasing rates of gun violence. PHB patients were compared to trauma registry controls from an era before prehospital blood utilization (2016-2019). Included were patients with penetrating injury and SBP ≤ 90 mmHg at initial EMS evaluation that received at least one unit of blood product after injury. Excluded were isolated head trauma or prehospital cardiac arrest. Time to initiation of blood administration before and after PHB implementation and in-hospital mortality were the primary variables of interest. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients (PHB = 61, controls = 82) were included for analysis. Median age was 34 years with no difference in demographics. Median scene and transport intervals were longer in the PHB cohort, with a 5-minute increase in total prehospital time. Time to administration of first unit of blood was significantly lower in the PHB vs. control group (8 min vs 27 min; p < 0.01). In-hospital mortality was lower in the PHB vs. control group (7% vs 29%; p < 0.01). When controlling for patient age, NISS, tachycardia on EMS evaluation, and total prehospital time interval, multivariate regression revealed an independent increase in mortality by 11% with each minute delay to blood administration following injury (OR 1.11, 95%CI 1.04-1.19). CONCLUSION: Compared to patients with penetrating trauma and hypotension who first received blood after hospital arrival, resuscitation with blood products was started 19 minutes earlier after initiation of a PHB program despite a 5-minute increase in prehospital time. A survival for early PHB use was demonstrated, with an 11% mortality increase for each minute delay to blood administration. Interventions such as PHB may improve patient outcomes by helping capture opportunities to improve trauma resuscitation closer to the point of injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, Level IV.

Faster refill in an urban emergency medical services system saves lives: A prospective preliminary evaluation of a prehospital advanced resuscitative care bundle.

INTRODUCTION: Military experience has demonstrated mortality improvement when advanced resuscitative care (ARC) is provided for trauma patients with severe hemorrhage. The benefits of ARC for trauma in civilian emergency medical services (EMS) systems with short transport intervals are still unknown. We hypothesized that ARC implementation in an urban EMS system would reduce in-hospital mortality. METHODS: This was a prospective analysis of ARC bundle administration between 2021 and 2023 in an urban EMS system with 70,000 annual responses. The ARC bundle consisted of calcium, tranexamic acid, and packed red blood cells via a rapid infuser. Advanced resuscitative care patients were compared with trauma registry controls from 2016 to 2019. Included were patients with a penetrating injury and systolic blood pressure ≤90 mm Hg. Excluded were isolated head trauma or prehospital cardiac arrest. In-hospital mortality was the primary outcome of interest. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients (ARC, 61; controls, 149) met the criteria. The median age was 32 years, with no difference in demographics, initial systolic blood pressure or heart rate recorded by EMS, or New Injury Severity Score between groups. At hospital arrival, ARC patients had lower median heart rate and shock index than controls ( p ≤ 0.03). Fewer patients in the ARC group required prehospital advanced airway placement ( p < 0.001). Twenty-four-hour and total in-hospital mortality were lower in the ARC group ( p ≤ 0.04). Multivariable regression revealed an independent reduction in in-hospital mortality with ARC (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.68; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Early ARC in a fast-paced urban EMS system is achievable and may improve physiologic derangements while decreasing patient mortality. Advanced resuscitative care closer to the point of injury warrants consideration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Tropical Storms and Hurricanes in New Orleans Lead to Increased Rates of Violent Injury.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of named weather storms on the rates of penetrating trauma is poorly understood with only case reports of single events currently guiding public health policy. This study examines whether tropical storms and hurricanes contribute to trauma services and volume. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional review of tropical storms/hurricanes affecting New Orleans, Louisiana, during hurricane seasons (June 1-November 30) from 2010-2021, and their association with the rate of penetrating trauma. Authors sought to determine how penetrating trauma rates changed during hurricane seasons and associate them with demographic variables. RESULTS: There were 5531 penetrating injuries, with 412 (7.4%) occurring during landfall and 554 (10.0%) in the aftermath. Black/African Americans were the most affected. There was an increase in the rate of penetrating events during landfall (3.4 events/day) and aftermath (3.5 events/day) compared to the baseline (2.8 events/day) (P = < 0.001). Using multivariate analysis, wind speed was positively related to firearm injury, whereas the rainfall total was inversely related to firearm violence rates during landfall and aftermath periods. Self-harm was positively related to distance from the trauma center. CONCLUSIONS: Cities at risk for named weather storms may face increasing gun violence in the landfall and aftermath periods. Black/African Americans are most affected, worsening existing disparities. Self-harm may also increase following these weather events.

Association Between Markers of Structural Racism and Mass Shooting Events in Major US Cities.

Importance: The root cause of mass shooting events (MSEs) and the populations most affected by them are poorly understood. Objective: To examine the association between structural racism and mass shootings in major metropolitan cities in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study of MSEs in the 51 largest metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in the United States analyzes population-based data from 2015 to 2019 and the Gun Violence Archive. The data analysis was performed from February 2021 to January 2022. Exposure: Shooting event where 4 or more people not including the shooter were injured or killed. Main Outcome and Measures: MSE incidence and markers of structural racism from demographic data, Gini income coefficient, Black-White segregation index, and violent crime rate. Results: There were 865 MSEs across all 51 MSAs from 2015 to 2019 with a total of 3968 injuries and 828 fatalities. Higher segregation index (ρ = 0.46, P = .003) was associated with MSE incidence (adjusted per 100 000 population) using Spearman ρ analysis. Percentage of the MSA population comprising Black individuals (ρ = 0.76, P < .001), children in a single-parent household (ρ = 0.44, P < .001), and violent crime rate (ρ = 0.34, P = .03) were other variables associated with MSEs. On linear regression, structural racism, as measured by percentage of the MSA population comprising Black individuals, was associated with MSEs (ß = 0.10; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.14; P < .001). Segregation index (ß = 0.02, 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.06; P = .53), children in a single-parent household (ß = -0.04, 95% CI, -0.11 to 0.04; P = .28), and Gini income coefficient (ß = -1.02; 95% CI, -11.97 to 9.93; P = .93) were not associated with MSEs on linear regression. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that major US cities with higher populations of Black individuals are more likely to be affected by MSEs, suggesting that structural racism may have a role in their incidence. Public health initiatives aiming to prevent MSEs should target factors associated with structural racism to address gun violence.

Succinate metabolism and membrane reorganization drives the endotheliopathy and coagulopathy of traumatic hemorrhage.

Acute hemorrhage commonly leads to coagulopathy and organ dysfunction or failure. Recent evidence suggests that damage to the endothelial glycocalyx contributes to these adverse outcomes. The physiological events mediating acute glycocalyx shedding are undefined, however. Here, we show that succinate accumulation within endothelial cells drives glycocalyx degradation through a membrane reorganization-mediated mechanism. We investigated this mechanism in a cultured endothelial cell hypoxia-reoxygenation model, in a rat model of hemorrhage, and in trauma patient plasma samples. We found that succinate metabolism by succinate dehydrogenase mediates glycocalyx damage through lipid oxidation and phospholipase A2-mediated membrane reorganization, promoting the interaction of matrix metalloproteinase 24 (MMP24) and MMP25 with glycocalyx constituents. In a rat hemorrhage model, inhibiting succinate metabolism or membrane reorganization prevented glycocalyx damage and coagulopathy. In patients with trauma, succinate levels were associated with glycocalyx damage and the development of coagulopathy, and the interaction of MMP24 and syndecan-1 was elevated compared to healthy controls.

Traumatic Injury in Pregnancy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma represents the leading cause of nonobstetrical maternal death. How in-hospital outcomes of acutely injured pregnant patients (PP) compares to that of similarly aged nonpregnant control groups (CGs) has not been described. We hypothesized that PPs suffering acute traumatic injuries would have worse outcomes compared to a matched CG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) was used to identify traumatically injured females between 2017 and 2019. Propensity score matching on age, race, injury severity score , and type of trauma (blunt, penetrating, or other) was used to compare PPs and the CG. Primary outcomes were mortality, disposition, length of stay (LOS), and complications. RESULTS: A total of 1078 traumatically injured pregnant females were identified. Propensity score matching resulted in 990 patients in the PP and CG cohorts. After matching, PPs were more likely to be assault victims (11% versus 6%, P < 0.001), had longer length of stay (LOS) (5 versus 3 d, P < 0.001), and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation (26% versus 16%, P < 0.001) or intensive care unit (ICU) admission (44% versus 32%, P < 0.001). PPs were more likely to proceed directly to the operating room (OR)(34% versus 15%, P < 0.001) and less likely to be discharged home from the emergency department (ED) (1% versus 12%, P < 0.001). Complications and mortality rates were similar among PPs. CONCLUSIONS: After acute trauma, PPs did not have increased mortality or complications when compared to matched controls, although they were more likely to be victims of assault, directly proceed to the OR, require mechanical ventilation or ICU admission, and have longer LOSs.

Iatrogenic Injuries in Manual and Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

PURPOSE: Mechanical chest compression has been shown to be equivalent to manual chest compression in providing survival benefits to patients experiencing cardiac arrest. There has been a growing need for a contemporary review of iatrogenic injuries caused by mechanical in comparison with manual chest compression. Our study aims to analyze the studies that document significant life-threatening iatrogenic injuries caused by mechanical and manual chest compression. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed and Embase was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All studies published after January 1st, 2000 were reviewed using inclusion/exclusion criteria and completed by May 2020. A total of 7202 patients enrolled in 15 studies were included in our meta-analysis. RESULTS: Significant life-threatening iatrogenic injuries had higher odds of occurring when mechanical chest compression was used compared to manual chest compression, especially for hemothorax and liver lacerations. Mechanical chest compression involves consistently deeper compression depths compared to manual chest compression, potentially resulting in more injuries. In the mechanical chest compression cohort, chest wall fractures had the highest incidence rate (55.7%), followed by sternal fracture (28.3%), lung injuries (3.7%), liver (1.0%), and diaphragm (.2%) lacerations. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical chest compression was associated with more iatrogenic injuries as compared to manual chest compression. Further research is needed to define the appropriate application of mechanical in comparison with manual chest compression in different scenarios. Levels of provider training, different mechanical chest compression device types, patient demographics, and compression duration/depth may all play roles in influencing outcomes.

Trends and Burden of Firearm-Related Injuries Among Children and Adolescents: A National Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Firearm-related injuries in America have been under increasing scrutiny over the last several years. Few studies have examined the burden of these injuries in the pediatric population. The objective of this study was to describe the incidence of firearm-related injuries in hospitalized pediatric patients in the United States and identify the risk factors associated with readmission in this young population. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database was examined from 2010 to 2017. Pediatric patients (aged ≤18 y) who survived their index hospitalization for any firearm injury were analyzed to determine incidence rate, case fatality rate, risk factors for 30-d readmission, and financial health care burden. RESULTS: There were 35,753 pediatric firearm injuries (86.8% male) with an overall incidence rate of 10.49 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.26-11.71) per 100,000 pediatric hospitalizations. Adolescents aged >12 y had the highest incidence rate (60.51, 95% CI: 55.19-65.84). In-hospital mortality occurred in 1948 cases (5.5%), with higher case fatality rates in males. There were 1616 (5.7%) unplanned 30-d readmissions. Multivariate analysis showed abdominal firearm injuries (hazard ratio: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03-1.24; P = 0.006) and longer length of stay (hazard ratio: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.04-1.55; P = 0.016) were associated with a greater risk of 30-d readmission. The median health care cost for firearm-related injuries was $36,535 (interquartile range: $19,802-$66,443), 22% of which was due to readmissions. Cost associated with 30-d readmissions was $7978 (interquartile range: $4305-$15,202). CONCLUSIONS: Firearm-related injury is a major contributor to pediatric morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Males are disproportionately affected by firearm injury, but females are more likely to require unplanned 30-d readmissions. Interventions should target female sex, injuries of suicidal intent, psychiatric comorbidities, prolonged index hospitalization, and abdominal injuries.

Stab Wound to the Right Ventricle With Creation of Ventricular Septal Defect Managed With an Endovascular Occlusive Patch.

Penetrating trauma to the cardiac box is associated with high rates of cardiac injury, structural complications, morbidity, and mortality. Early identification and intervention of these injuries is paramount to obtaining good patient outcomes. In this paper, we report a 55-year-old male who sustained a single stab wound to left chest which perforated the right ventricle. The patient also sustained a muscular ventricular septal defect (VSD) which led to a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) course complicated by late pericardial tamponade. We present successful management of this patient's initial injury along with his ICU course culminating in successful endovascular occlusive patch VSD repair.

Thromboembolic Outcomes in Tetrahydrocannabinol-Positive Trauma Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant source of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Recent shifts in state legislation have increased the use of recreational and medical marijuana. While cannabinoids and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) have known anti-inflammatory effects, the impact of preinjury THC use on clinical outcomes in the setting of severe TBI is unknown. We hypothesized that preinjury THC use in trauma patients suffering TBI would be associated with decreased thromboembolic events and adverse outcomes. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program was used to identify patients aged ≥18 y with TBI and severe injury (Injury Severity Score ≥ 16) in admit year 2017. Patients with smoking or tobacco history or missing or positive toxicology tests for drug and/or alcohol use other than THC were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to compare THC+ patients to similar THC- patients. RESULTS: A total of 13,266 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 1669 were THC+. A total of 1377 THC+ patients were matched to 1377 THC- patients. No significant differences were found in in-hospital outcomes, including mortality, length of stay, cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, or acute respiratory distress syndrome. No patients had ischemic stroke, and THC+ patients had significantly decreased rates of hemorrhagic stroke (0.5% versus 1.5%, P = 0.02, odds ratio 0.41 [95% confidence interval 0.18-0.86]). CONCLUSIONS: Preinjury THC use may be associated with decreased hemorrhagic stroke in severely injured patients with TBI, but there was no difference in thromboembolic outcomes. Further research into pathophysiological mechanisms related to THC are needed.

How Does Insurance Status Correlate With Trauma Mechanisms and Outcomes? A Retrospective Study at a Level 1 Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVE: Studies showed that a lack of insurance is associated with worse trauma outcomes. We examine insurance status and trauma mortality in a diverse metropolitan city and hypothesize that the higher risk of mortality in uninsured patients is due to insurance status and other factors. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients admitted to a Level 1 Trauma center for emergent surgery in a diverse metropolitan city from Jan 2016-May 2020 was conducted. Patients of different insurance statuses were analyzed for their injury mechanism and surgical intervention outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression was performed and the results were presented as odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals and P values. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: 738 patients met study criteria. Medicaid patients made up the largest proportions of injury mechanisms: 65.1% of gunshot wound cases, sharp object (41.7%), and falls (32.5%). Private insurance (OR = .13, 95% CI: .05-.35, P = .000), Medicaid (OR = .19, 95% CI: .10-.35, P = .000), Medicare (OR = .65, 95% CI: 0.28-1.51, P = .31), and other insurance (OR = .44, 95% CI 0.22-.87, P = .01) were associated with survival. Uninsured patients had the highest mortality rate resulting from trauma at 32.6% (P < .001), and the lowest mortality rate belonged to the private insurance cohort (6.3%, P < .001). Uninsured patients accounted for 10.5% of gunshot wound cases, 8.5% of motor vehicle accident cases, 25% of sharp object cases, and 6.6% of falls. CONCLUSION: Being uninsured was independently associated with mortality, while having insurance improved outcomes. Underlying mechanisms should be further elucidated to improve health equity and trauma outcomes in diverse patient populations.

New Injury Severity Score and Trauma Injury Severity Score are superior in predicting trauma mortality.

BACKGROUND: Trauma scores are used to give clinicians appropriate quantitative context in making decisions. Studies show that anatomical trauma scores predicted intensive care unit admission better, while physiological trauma scores predicted mortality better. We hypothesize that trauma scores have a hierarchy of efficacies at predicting mortality and operative decision making. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of our trauma patient database at a level 1 trauma center from 2016 to 2020 and calculated the following trauma scores: Glasgow Coma Scale, Revised Trauma Score, Trauma Injury Severity Score, Injury Severity Score, Shock Index, and New Trauma Injury Severity Score (NISS). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of trauma scores for predicting mortality. RESULTS: A total of 738 patients were included (mean ± SD age, 35.7 ± 15.6 years). Area under the curve (AUC) results from the DeLong test showed that NISS predicted mortality the best compared with other trauma scores. New Trauma Injury Severity Score was superior in predicting mortality for penetrating trauma (AUC, 0.86 ± 0.02; p < 0.001) compared with blunt trauma (AUC, 0.73 ± 0.04; p < 0.001). Trauma Injury Severity Score was the best predictor of mortality for patients with gunshot wounds (AUC, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.92; p < 0.001), motor vehicle accidents (AUC, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.61-1.00; p = 0.01), and falls (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85; p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: New Trauma Injury Severity Score was the best scoring index for predicting mortality in trauma patients, especially for penetrating trauma. Clinicians should consider incorporating other trauma scores, especially NISS and Trauma Injury Severity Score, in determining injury severity and the likelihood of mortality. These scores can help physicians determine the best course of action in patient management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiologic; level IV.

Re-visiting Drain Use in Operative Liver Trauma: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the liver being one of the most frequently injured abdominal organs in trauma patients, clinical management strategies differ between trauma surgeons. Few studies have critically evaluated current practice patterns in the operative management of liver trauma. Historical studies recommended against the use of drains but there has not been a modern investigation of this issue. The objective of this study was to analyze outcomes associated with intra-operative drain use for liver trauma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all adult trauma patients presenting to a Level I trauma center from 2012 to 2018 was performed. Patients who underwent operative management of liver trauma were divided into groups based on whether an intra-abdominal drain was utilized and differences in outcomes between the groups were analyzed. The primary endpoint evaluated was post-operative intra-abdominal abscesses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: 184 patients with operative management of liver trauma were included in the study. Closed suction drains were utilized in 26.1% of post-operative patients. Rate of intra-abdominal abscesses was significantly higher in the drain group (35.4% versus 8.8%, P < 0.001). Drains were more commonly used in patients receiving more units of PRBCs (median, 9 units [IQR 4-20] versus median 5.5 units, [IQR 2-14], P = 0.03). Drain use was found to be an independent risk factor for post-operative intra-abdominal abscess on multivariate analysis (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.7-14, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support previous conclusions that drain placement for operative liver trauma is associated with increased risks of infectious complications. Drains were used in patients with more severe liver injury, intra-operative bile leaks, penetrating trauma, and increased blood transfusion requirements. Future studies should focus on the development of specific guidelines for the use of drains in liver trauma.

Elevated K/iCa ratio is an ancillary predictor for mortality in patients with severe hemorrhage: A decision tree analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma patients receiving massive transfusion protocol (MTP) are at risk of citrate-induced hypocalcemia and hyperkalemia. Here we evaluate potassium (K), ionized calcium (iCa), and K/iCa ratio as predictors of mortality. METHODS: This retrospective study includes all adult trauma patients who received MTP within 1 h at our level I trauma center between 2014 and 2019. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis assessed predictive accuracy of K/iCa ratio at admission on 120-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 614 patients, 146 received MTP within 1 h and 38 expired. Patients who expired had higher K/iCa ratio than survivors (median [IQR] = 5.7 [3.8-7.2] vs 3.7 [3.1-4.9], p < 0.001). Area under the curve of K/iCa was 0.72 (95%CI = 0.62-0.82, p < 0.001) with sensitivity = 63.2% and specificity = 77.6%. At the optimum K/iCa cutoff (5.07), patients with high ratios had 4 times higher mortality risk (HR = 3.97, 95%CI = 1.89-8.32, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Elevated K/iCa ratio was an independent predictor of mortality in trauma patients managed with MTP.

Surgical stabilization of traumatic rib fractures is associated with reduced readmissions and increased survival.

BACKGROUND: Surgical stabilization for rib fractures (SSRF) in trauma patients remains controversial, with guidelines currently suggesting the procedure for only select patient groups. How surgical stabilization for rib fractures affect hospital readmission in patients with traumatic rib fractures is unknown. We hypothesized that surgical stabilization for rib fractures would not decrease the risk of readmission. METHODS: The National Readmission Database was examined for adults with any rib fractures from 2010 to 2017. Readmission up to 90 days was examined. Patients receiving surgical stabilization for rib fractures were compared with those receiving nonoperative treatment. RESULTS: In total, 864,485 patients met criteria, with 13,701 (1.6%) receiving SSRF. For patients receiving SSRF, 338 (1.5%) were readmitted. Readmitted patients had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and were more likely to have flail chest. On multivariate propensity score-matched analysis, SSRF (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.92, P = .022) was associated with reduced readmission. Addition of surgical stabilization for rib fractures to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.95, 95% CI 0.52-1.73, P = .86) or thoracotomy (OR: 1.97, 95% CI 0.83-4.70, P = .13) was not associated with increased readmission. On further propensity matched analysis, VATS + SSRF when compared with SSRF alone (HR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.18-3.20, P = .696), and VATS + SSRF when compared with VATS alone (HR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.11-2.22, P = .355) was also not associated with increased readmission. SSRF on primary admission was associated with increased in-hospital survival (HR: 0.27, 95% CI 0.22-0.32, P < .001). For patients with retained hemothorax who underwent VATS, addition of SSRF did not improve survival (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.58-1.46, P = .72). However, for patients requiring thoracotomy for retained hemothorax, concomitant SSRF was associated with improved survival (HR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.06-0.32, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Surgical stabilization for rib fractures is associated with reduced readmission risk while also being associated with improved survival. Patients who had a thoracotomy for retained hemothorax appear to especially benefit from concomitant surgical stabilization for rib fractures.

After 800 Mtp Events, Mortality Due to Hemorrhagic Shock Remains High and Unchanged Despite Several In-Hospital Hemorrhage Control Advancements.

BACKGROUND: Numerous advancements in hemorrhage control and volume replacement that comprise damage control resuscitation (DCR) have been implemented in the last decade to reduce deaths from bleeding. We sought to determine the impact of DCR interventions on mortality over 12 years in a massive transfusion protocol (MTP) population. We hypothesized that mortality would be decreased in later years, which would have used more DCR interventions. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of all MTP patients treated at a large regional Level I trauma center from 2008 to 2019. Interventions by year of implementation examined included MTP 1:1 ratio (2009), liquid plasma (2010), tranexamic acid (2012), prehospital tourniquets (2013), REBOA/TEG (2017), satellite blood station (2018), and whole blood transfusion (2019). Relative risk and odds of mortality for DCR interventions were examined. RESULTS: There were 824 MTP patients included. The cohort was primarily male (80.6%) injured by penetrating mechanism (68.1%) with median (interquartile range) age 31 years (23-44) and New Injury Severity Score 25 (16-34). Overall mortality was unchanged [(38.3%-56.6%); P = 0.26]. Tourniquets (P = 0.02) and whole blood (WB) (P = 0.03) were associated with lower unadjusted mortality; only tourniquets remained significant after adjustment (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.17-0.89; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Despite lower mortality with use of tourniquets and WB, mortality rates due to hemorrhage have not improved at our high MTP volume institution, suggesting implementation of new in-hospital strategies is insufficient to reduce mortality. Future efforts should be directed toward moving hemorrhage control and effective resuscitation interventions to the injury scene.

Maintaining trauma center operational readiness during a pandemic.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a slow-moving global disaster with unique challenges for maintaining trauma center operations. University Medical Center New Orleans is the only level 1 trauma center in New Orleans, LA, which became an early hotspot for COVID-19. Intensive care unit surge capacity, addressing components including space, staff, stuff, and structure, is important in maintaining trauma center operability during a high resource-strain event like a pandemic. We report management of the trauma center's surge capacity to maintain trauma center operations while assisting in the care of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Lessons learned and recommendations are provided to assist trauma centers in planning for the influx of COVID-19 patients at their centers.

Firearm homicide mortality is influenced by structural racism in US metropolitan areas.

INTRODUCTION: Metropolitan cities in the United States suffer from higher rates of gun violence. However, the specific structural factors associated with increased gun violence are poorly defined. We hypothesized that firearm homicide in metropolitan cities would be impacted by Black-White segregation index. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis evaluated 51 US metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) using data from 2013 to 2017. Several measures of structural racism were examined, including the Brooking Institute's Black-White segregation index. Demographic data were derived from the US Census Bureau, US Department of Education, and US Department of Labor. Crime data and firearm homicide mortality rates were obtained from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Centers for Disease Control. Spearman ρ and linear regression were performed. RESULTS: Firearm mortality was associated with multiple measures of structural racism and racial disparity, including White-Black segregation index, unemployment rate, poverty rate, single parent household, percent Black population, and crime rates. In regression analysis, percentage Black population exhibited the strongest association with firearm homicide mortality (ß = 0.42, p < 0.001). Black-White segregation index (ß = 0.41, p = 0.001) and percent children living in single-parent households (ß = 0.41, p = 0.002) were also associated with higher firearm homicide mortality. Firearm legislation scores were associated with lower firearm homicide mortality (ß = -0.20 p = 0.02). High school and college graduation rates were not associated with firearm homicide mortality and were not included in the final model. CONCLUSION: Firearm homicide disproportionately impacts communities of color and is associated with measures of structural racism, such as White-Black segregation index. Public health interventions targeting gun violence must address these systemic inequities. Furthermore, given the association between firearm mortality and single-parent households, intervention programs for at-risk youth may be particularly effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological level II.