Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity with the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing patients: does size matter?

BACKGROUND: Currently, the manufacturer of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA; Laryngeal Mask Company, Ltd., Northfield End, Henley on Thames, Oxon, United Kingdom) recommends using as large a mask size as possible. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity after the use of a large (size 5 in males and size 4 in females) or small (size 4 in males and size 3 in females) LMA in spontaneously breathing patients. METHODS: A total of 258 male and female patients were randomly assigned to insertion of a large or small LMA while breathing spontaneously during general anesthesia. After insertion of the LMA, a "just-seal" cuff pressure was obtained, and intracuff pressure was measured at 10-min intervals until just before removal of the LMA. The 2- and 24-h incidence of postoperative sore throat, pain, hoarseness, dysphagia, and nausea and vomiting was assessed. Complications after LMA removal, including body movement, coughing, retching, regurgitation, vomiting, biting on the LMA, bronchospasm, laryngospasm, or the presence of blood on the LMA, were recorded. RESULTS: The use of a large LMA was associated with a higher incidence of sore throat in both sexes (20% vs. 7% in men, 21% vs. 5% in women; P < 0.05) and a higher incidence of hoarseness in male patients at 2 h postoperatively (21% vs. 9%, P < 0.05). There was a higher incidence of sore throat in male patients at 24 h postoperatively with the use of a large LMA (26% vs. 12%, P < 0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of complications of LMA removal orother pharyngolaryngeal morbidity, such as difficulty swallowing, drinking, and eating, or nausea and vomiting, between male or female groups at any time period with the use of a large LMA. CONCLUSIONS: Selection of a small laryngeal mask airway (size 4) in spontaneously breathing male patients may be more appropriate to limit the occurrence of sore throat on the first postoperative day. All patients had a fourfold increased risk of developing sore throat when a large LMA was used.

Fatal subdural haemorrhage following lumbar spinal drainage during repair of thoraco-abdominal aneurysm.

A 63-year-old male patient collapsed and died from a major subdural haemorrhage 5 days after elective repair of a Type III thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm. The anaesthetic technique had included the use of a lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drain. The management of the patient is described, and the association between subdural haemorrhage and cerebrospinal fluid drainage is discussed.

Intraoperative vs postoperative morphine improves analgesia without increasing PONV on emergence from ambulatory surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the timing of administration of morphine in patients undergoing painful ambulatory surgical procedures to determine whether there was a difference in postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV), quality of analgesia, and recovery profile. METHODS: In a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, prospective study, 70 ASA I-II patients were randomized to receive 0.1 mg x kg(-1) morphine intraoperatively (lop) (n=35), or postoperatively (Pop) (n=35). The severity of nausea and pain were measured using visual analog scales (VAS). RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups in postoperative nausea scores or the incidence of PONV. Upon awakening, patients who received Pop morphine had higher pain VAS scores with movement (7.6 +/- 2 vs 5.4 +/- 3, P < 0.003) and at rest (6.9 +/- 3 vs 5.1 +/- 3, P < 0.013) than the lop morphine group. The total number of PCA attempts and analgesic requirements were similar. Patients who received Pop morphine were able to drink sooner than the lop group (90 +/- 34 vs 111 +/- 38 min, P < 0.05). All other recovery milestones were similar. Times to discharge from hospital were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of 0.1 mg x kg(-1) morphine iv intraoperatively improves postoperative analgesia upon emergence from painful ambulatory surgical procedures without increasing the incidence of PONV There was no increase in PONV when morphine was administered intraoperatively rather than postoperatively.

A comparison of midazolam, alfentanil and propofol for sedation in outpatient intraocular surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine the ideal sedative regimen for intraocular surgery under peribulbar or retrobulbar block. The addition of alfentanil and or propofol to midazolam was evaluated with regard to hemodynamic variables, respiratory rate, pain, anxiety, sedation, postoperative recovery and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Eighty two patients aged between 50 and 85 were recruited into this prospective, randomised, double blind study. Patients, in four groups, received 0.015 mg x kg(-1) midazolam, 5 microg x kg(-1) alfentanil and 0.15 mg x kg(-1) propofol; 0.015 mg x kg(-1) midazolam and 0.15 mg x kg(-1) propofol; 0.015 mg x kg(-1) midazolam and 5 microg x kg(-1) alfentanil or 0.015 mg x kg(-1) midazolam alone. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, pain, anxiety and sedation scores were measured. Times to discharge from the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and Day Surgery Unit (DSU) were documented. A 24 hr telephone interview was carried out to determine patient satisfaction. RESULT: Systolic blood pressure of patients in groups that had received alfentanil was 6% lower than that of patients who had not (P<0.05) at the time of insertion of intraocular block. Patients in the alfentanil groups also had lower respiratory rates during the first 15 min after drug administration, but all patients were given supplemental oxygen therefore oxygen saturation was unaffected. Pain scores of patients who had been given alfentanil were lower during the first postoperative hour than those who had not. CONCLUSION: The addition of alfentanil to midazolam is advantageous in providing sedation for insertion of intraocular block.

Postoperative sore throat: cause, prevention and treatment.

Sore throat is a common postoperative complaint, occurring most often following tracheal intubation. Factors such as tracheal-tube size and cuff design have been shown to be important causative factors. Routine tracheal intubation for elective surgical procedures can result in pathological changes, trauma and nerve damage which may also account for postoperative throat symptoms. Sore throat following the use of a laryngeal mask appears to be related to the technique of insertion but the contribution of intracuff pressure remains to be clarified. It would appear, however, that high intracuff pressure is associated with nerve palsies due to neuropraxia and nerve compression. Careful insertion techniques for both the tracheal tube and laryngeal mask are of paramount importance in the prevention of airway trauma and postoperative sore throat.

Patient-controlled extradural analgesia with bupivacaine, fentanyl, or a mixture of both, after Caesarean section.

In this randomized, double-blind study of 60 patients, we have assessed the analgesic efficacy of extradural bupivacaine and extradural fentanyl, either alone or in combination, after Caesarean section. Patients received 0.1% bupivacaine (group B), fentanyl 4 micrograms ml-1 (group F) or 0.05% bupivacaine combined with fentanyl 2 micrograms ml-1 (group BF) by patient-controlled extradural analgesia (PCEA). Adding fentanyl to bupivacaine reduced the dose of bupivacaine by up to 68%, improved analgesia at rest and decreased PCEA use. Motor and sensory block were decreased, but there was more pruritus. Overall patient satisfaction was increased. Adding bupivacaine to fentanyl reduced the dose of fentanyl by up to 57% without altering pain scores or PCEA use. Sensory block increased but pruritus did not decrease. Bupivacaine 0.05% produced clinically significant leg weakness in three patients. Overall patient satisfaction was not altered. There was a significant additive analgesic effect between 0.05% bupivacaine and fentanyl but no clinical benefit was demonstrated from using the combination compared with fentanyl alone for this group of postoperative patients.