Adverse Events Associated with Intra-Arterial Administration of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the risk of immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HRs), contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI), nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), and gadolinium retention associated with use of intra-arterial gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1988 (GBCAs approved for clinical use) to March 2021 for studies reporting adverse events associated with intra-arterial administration of GBCAs. The number of adverse events and GBCA administrations were used to calculate incidence in individual studies, and results across studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: There were 72 studies (patients = 1,221) that reported on HR, 59 studies (patients = 1,142) that reported on CA-AKI, and 6 studies (patients = 291) that reported on NSF. No studies reported gadolinium retention as an outcome. Based on 5 events and 1,451 GBCA administrations, the incidence of HR per 100 administrations was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.52-1.51). Based on 90 events and 1,318 GBCA administrations, the incidence of CA-AKI per 100 administrations was 5.94 (95% CI, 3.92-8.34). Based on 7 events and 361 GBCA administrations, the incidence of NSF per 100 Group I GBCA administrations was 4.72 (95% CI, 0.35-13.70). There were no unconfounded NSF events after Group II GBCA administration. CONCLUSIONS: HRs to intra-arterial administration of GBCAs are rare, with no serious reactions. Limited data demonstrate a higher-than-expected rate of CA-AKI; however, multiple confounding factors were noted. Thus, any causative link of CA-AKI to GBCA remains controversial. Also, severe physiologic reactions (including life-threatening arrhythmias) during coronary angiography have been reported.

Optimal vascular access strategies for patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review.

IMPORTANCE: Systemic chemotherapy can be administered either through a peripheral vein (IV), or centrally through peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), totally implanted vascular access devices (PORTs) or tunnelled cuffed catheters. Despite the widespread use of systemic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer, the optimal choice of vascular access is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluated complication rates and patient satisfaction with different access strategies for administering neo/adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEWED: Ovid Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1946 to September 2017. Two reviewers independently assessed each citation. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of cohort and case-control studies. FINDINGS: Of 1584 citations identified, 15 unique studies met the pre-specified eligibility criteria. There were no randomised studies comparing types of vascular access. Reports included six single-institution retrospective cohort studies, one retrospective multi-institution cohort, one retrospective cohort database study, five prospective single-institution studies, one prospective multi-institution study and one nested case-control study. Median complication rates were infection: 6.0% PICC (2 studies) versus 2.1% PORT (8 studies); thrombosis: 8.9% PICC (2 studies) versus 2.6% PORT (9 studies); extravasation: 0 PICC (1 study) versus 0.4% PORT (4 studies) and mechanical issues: PICC 3.8% (1 study) versus 1.8% PORT (9 studies). Satisfaction/quality of life appeared high with each device. CONCLUSION: In the absence of high-quality data comparing vascular access strategies, randomised, adequately powered, prospective studies would be required to help inform clinical practice and reduce variation.

Intracellular lipid in clear cell renal cell carcinoma tumor thrombus and metastases detected by chemical shift (in and opposed phase) MRI: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

BACKGROUND: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RRC) characteristically contain intracellular lipid which is also detectable in tumor thrombus and metastases. PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of intracellular lipid in clear cell RCC metastases and tumor thrombus using chemical shift MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: With REB approval, 33 consecutive patients with clear cell RCC and tumor thrombus/metastatic disease underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over a 10-year period. Diagnosis was established by histopathology for tumor thrombi (n = 25) and metastases (n = 15) or growth for metastases (n = 14). Two blinded radiologists independently assessed for a signal intensity (SI) drop at chemical shift MRI (indicative of intracellular lipid) and a third radiologist established consensus. Chemical shift SI (CS-SI) index ([SItumorIP - SItumorOP]/SITumorIP x 100) was calculated. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using intra-class correlation (ICC) and tests of association were performed using the Chi-square test and Spearman correlation. RESULTS: Using CS-MRI, intracellular lipid was detected in 36.4% of clear cell RCC, with moderate agreement, (ICC = 0.5). Intracellular lipid was detected in 20% of tumor thrombi and 20% of metastases with strong agreement (ICC = 0.73). Intracellular lipid within tumor thrombi/metastases was not associated with lipid within the primary tumor (P = 0.09). There was a correlation in CS-SI index between primary tumor and thrombi/metastases when lipid was detected in both lesions (r = 0.91, P = 0.005); however, there was no correlation when lipid was not detected in both lesions (r = -0.09, P = 0.72). CONCLUSION: The presence of intracellular lipid in tumor thrombus and metastases from clear cell RCC is uncommon and, is not necessarily associated with lipid within the primary tumor at chemical shift MRI.

Complication rates and effectiveness of uterine artery embolization in the treatment of symptomatic leiomyomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the rates of major complications, other associated adverse events, reintervention, and clinical improvement from studies reporting complications of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of symptomatic leiomyomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for publications on the treatment of leiomyomas by UAE. Data pertaining to study characteristics, numbers of complications, symptomatic improvement, and reinterventions were collected by two readers. Pooled event rates were calculated using a random effects method. RESULTS: Fifty-four study populations met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 8159 patients. There were no reported deaths. Major complications occurred at a rate of 2.9% (95% CI, 2.2-3.8%). The rate of hysterectomy for resolution of a complication from UAE was 0.7% (0.5-0.9%), and the rate of readmission was 2.7% (1.9-3.7%). Multiple other specific complications were recorded including leiomyoma tissue passage (4.7% [3.9-5.7%]), deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (0.2% [0.2-0.4%]), and permanent amenorrhea (3.9% [2.7-5.3%]). Reintervention rates including repeat UAE, myomectomy, or hysterectomy calculated per patient-year occurred at 5.3% (4.2-6.4%) with follow-up ranging from 0.25 to 5 years. Clinical symptomatic improvement ranged from 78% to 90%, with follow-up ranging from 0.25 to 2 years. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic uterine leiomyoma treatment by UAE is an effective procedure with a low rate of major complications supporting its use as an alternative to hysterectomy.

Multidetector helical CT in the evaluation of acute small bowel obstruction: comparison of non-enhanced (no oral, rectal or IV contrast) and IV enhanced CT.

PURPOSE: To compare accuracy of non-enhanced CT (NECT) (no oral or IV contrast) and enhanced CT (ECT) (IV enhanced only) to diagnose small bowel obstruction and evaluate reviewer's experience impact. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine adult patients underwent 105 NECT and ECT (6 patients had 2 examinations) on a four-detector CT. An abdominal radiologist, an abdominal imaging fellow, a second-year radiology resident retrospectively reviewed NECTs and ECTs separately and independently blinded to outcome. Discrepancy of diameter of proximal and distal small bowel+/-a transition was considered indication of mechanical bowel obstruction. Reference standard was surgery in 26 and chart review in 79. RESULTS: Mechanical obstruction was present in 56% (59/105). The average sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive and accuracy values for NECT were 88.1% (CI: 80-96%), 77% (CI: 65-89%), 83.0% (CI: 72-95%), 83% (CI: 74-92%), and 83% (CI: 76-90%) with no significant difference between three reviewers. The corresponding numbers for ECT were 87.6% (CI: 79-96%), 75% (CI: 63-88%), 82.6.0% (CI: 71-94%), 82.1% (CI: 73-92%), and 82% (CI: 75-90%) (p>0.5). Area under curve (AUC) of ROC curves of three reviewers did not show significant statistical difference (p>0.5). CONCLUSIONS: NECT and ECT have comparable accuracy to diagnose mechanical small bowel obstruction and can be interpreted by reviewers with different levels of expertise.