Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome and controversies in diagnosis and management.

Compression of the neurovascular structures at the level of the scalene triangle and pectoralis minor space is rare, but increasing awareness and understanding is allowing for the treatment of more individuals than in the past. We outlined the recognition, preoperative evaluation, and treatment of patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Recent work has illustrated the role of imaging and centrality of the physical examination on the diagnosis. However, a fuller understanding of the spatial biomechanics of the shoulder, scalene triangle, and pectoralis minor musculotendinous complex has shown that, although physical therapy is a mainstay of treatment, a poor response to physical therapy with a sound diagnosis should not preclude decompression. Modes of failure of surgical decompression stress the importance of full resection of the anterior scalene muscle and all posterior rib impinging elements to minimize the risk of recurrence of symptoms. Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is a rare but critical cause of disability of the upper extremity. Modern understanding of the pathophysiology and evaluation have led to a sounder diagnosis. Although physical therapy is a mainstay, surgical decompression remains the gold standard to preserve and recover function of the upper extremity. Understanding these principles will be central to further developments in the treatment of this patient population.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Infrainguinal Bypass in the Endovascular Era.

BACKGROUND: The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) developed objective performance goals (OPGs) for lower extremity bypass (LEB) in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) based on studies that included patients who were at good risk for open revascularization. In the endovascular era, many LEB patients have had prior interventions, and most would be considered high-risk by the original SVS OPG standards. The goal of this study is to characterize a contemporary patient population undergoing LEB for CLTI and determine if outcomes remain commensurate with the parameters established by the SVS OPG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent LEB for CLTI over a 10-year period (2012-2021) were identified. Patients were stratified into low- and high-risk categories based upon the clinical, conduit, and anatomic parameters used in the SVS OPG. Limb salvage at 1 year and amputation-free survival, a composite outcome of major amputation and mortality, at 1 year were compared with the SVS OPG cohort. Primary, assisted, and secondary patency at 1 and 3 years were also evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: There were 169 LEBs performed for CLTI. One hundred and two (60.36%) males, 101 (59.76%) current or former smokers, 115 (68.05%) with hypertension, 69 (40.83%) with diabetes mellitus, and 40 (23.67%) with coronary artery disease. Median age was 71.84 years, and mean follow-up was 2.17 years. 65 (38.46%) had a prior ipsilateral endovascular intervention, and 18 (10.65%) were redo bypasses. 21 (12.43%) were deemed clinically high-risk, 44 (26.04%) were high-risk conduits, and 118 (69.82%) had high-risk anatomic factors. Freedom from amputation at 1 year was 87.05% in this cohort which was similar to the overall SVS OPG cohort (88.9%). Amputation-free survival at 1 year was 77.78%, which was also similar to the overall SVS OPG cohort (76.5%). Primary patency at one and three years was 46.84% and 37.59%, assisted patency at one and three years was 61.87% and 44.81%, and secondary patency at one and three years was 72.13% and 61.16%. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients undergoing LEB in the endovascular era meet the SVS OPG criteria for high risk. Despite this, the 1-year limb salvage and amputation-free survival in this cohort were equivalent to the SVS OPG LEB cohort. This supports the continued use of LEB for limb salvage in high-risk patients and those who have failed endovascular approaches.

Dysphagia.

Dysphagia, or difficult swallowing, can result in malnutrition, dehydration, aspiration pneumonia, and airway obstruction. Some primary etiologies of dysphagia include neurological disorders, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, head and neck cancer, cervical spine injury, and stroke. Home care clinicians are often the first healthcare professionals to encounter patients exhibiting signs of dysphagia and can play an important role in identifying, referring, and educating patients with dysphagia. This article will discuss the broad types of dysphagia, the signs and symptoms that suggest dysphagia, and the possible etiology and treatment.

Bilateral ovarian micrometastatic adenocarcinoma upon prophylactic oophorectomy concurrent with low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This case report draws attention to the debated role of prophylactic oophorectomy in women undergoing definitive surgical resection of colon and rectal cancers. It can be challenging to discern the indications and appropriate patient population for this procedure based on the current literature. Potential benefits include treatment and prevention of metastatic disease, preventing development of primary ovarian cancer, and prolonging survival. Negative effects include an increase in operative time and potential morbidity, development of osteoporosis, the risk of cardiac events, and decreasing sexual function. Multiple patient factors such as age, menopausal status, patient preference, presence of hereditary conditions, exposure to radiation, site, and stage of disease should be considered. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case in which a premenopausal 49-year-old female underwent a prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy concurrently with a low anterior resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for clinical stage III rectal cancer. On pathologic examination, resection margins and all 14 lymph nodes harvested were negative for malignancy. Interestingly, she was found to have micrometastatic adenocarcinoma in the bilateral ovaries which had appeared grossly normal at the time of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: After consideration of the current literature, patient preference, and our clinical judgment, our patient ultimately had a therapeutic effect after undergoing prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy concurrently with a low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The addition of prophylactic oophorectomy in a select population, specifically women 50 years of age or younger and/or women who are in the premenopausal state, may carry a survival benefit in the setting of definitive surgical resection of colon and rectal cancers.

High-sensitivity ST2 for prediction of adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Soluble ST2 reflects activity of an interleukin-33-dependent cardioprotective signaling axis and is a diagnostic and prognostic marker in acute heart failure. The use of ST2 in chronic heart failure has not been well defined. Our objective was to determine whether plasma ST2 levels predict adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure in the context of current approaches. METHODS AND RESULTS: We determined the association between ST2 level and risk of death or transplantation in a multicenter, prospective cohort of 1141 chronic heart failure outpatients. Adjusted Cox models, receiver operating characteristic analyses, and risk reclassification metrics were used to assess the value of ST2 in predicting risk beyond currently used factors. After a median of 2.8 years, 267 patients (23%) died or underwent heart transplantation. Patients in the highest ST2 tertile (ST2 >36.3 ng/mL) had a markedly increased risk of adverse outcomes compared with the lowest tertile (ST2 ≤22.3 ng/mL), with an unadjusted hazard ratio of 3.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2 to 4.7; P<0.0001) that remained significant after multivariable adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.9; P=0.002). In receiver operating characteristic analyses, the area under the curve for ST2 was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.79), which was similar to N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (area under the curve, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.81; P=0.24 versus ST2) but lower than the Seattle Heart Failure Model (area under the curve, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.85; P=0.014 versus ST2). Addition of ST2 and NT-proBNP to the Seattle Heart Failure Model reclassified 14.9% of patients into more appropriate risk categories (P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: ST2 is a potent marker of risk in chronic heart failure and when used in combination with NT-proBNP offers moderate improvement in assessing prognosis beyond clinical risk scores.