Human milk, breastfeeding, and early neurodevelopmental outcomes for infants with critical CHD.

Human milk improves neurodevelopment for preterm infants, but relationships between human milk and neurodevelopment for infants with critical CHD are unknown. We aimed to (1) explore associations between human milk/direct breastfeeding and neurodevelopment at 1-year and 2-year follow-up and (2) describe patterns of human milk (maternal, donor) and commercial formula during hospitalisation in the first year of life.This retrospective cohort study included infants who underwent surgery for CHD < 6 months old. The primary outcome was neurodevelopment via Bayley Scales of Infant Development-IV. Analysis included adjusted linear regression for associations between exclusive human milk while inpatient during the first 6 months or any direct breastfeeding while inpatient during the first year of life and 1-year Bayley-IV scores. Models were adjusted for race, insurance type, genetic diagnosis, and length of stay.Of 98 eligible infants, 40% followed up at 1 year; 27% at 2 years. There were differences in follow-up related to demographics (race, ethnicity) and social determinants of health (insurance type, distance from clinic). In adjusted models, infants who directly breastfed had 13.18 points higher cognition (95% CI: 0.84-25.53, p = 0.037); 14.04 points higher language (2.55-25.53, p = 0.018); and 15.80 points higher motor scores (3.27-28.34, p = 0.015) at 1-year follow-up. Infants fed exclusive human milk had 12.64 points higher cognition scores (-0.53-25.82, p = 0.059).Future investigation into nutrition and neurodevelopment in the context of critical CHD is warranted. As neurodevelopmental follow-up becomes standard of care in this population, efforts are needed to mitigate disparities in access to this care.

Adaptive Leadership in Parents Caring for their Children Born with Life-Threatening Conditions.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to chronicle the adaptive challenges and adaptive work, including emerging leadership behaviors, recounted over time by the parents of very young children diagnosed before birth with life threatening conditions. DESIGN AND METHODS: A descriptive, follow-up study design was used for the current study. Following the original grounded dimensional analysis study completed in 2012, the corpus for this analysis was collected in 2014. In-depth, audio-recorded interviews were conducted with 15 families (8 couples, 7 mothers). The 15 children, born with cardiac, abdominal, and cerebrospinal anomalies, were 14 - 37 months or deceased at follow-up. A directed content analysis of transcribed verbatim interviews was structured by the Adaptive Leadership framework. RESULTS: Parents described behaviors that indicated a non-linear development towards adaptive leadership as they accomplished the adaptive work within intra- and interpersonal domains that was necessary to address challenges over time. Not all parents described abilities and/or a willingness to mobilize others to do adaptive work, suggesting that adaptive leadership remained an unrealized potential. CONCLUSIONS: Understood as a complex adaptive system, parents of medically at-risk children hold potential for development towards adaptive leadership and collaborative partnership within the family and with healthcare providers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Due to improved survival rates, parents face ongoing challenges related to their children's unpredictable and often chronic health needs. Study findings illustrate parents' adaptive work and leadership behaviors, which can inform nursing assessments, as well as the type and timing for intervention.

Appreciation of the Research-Practice Link: Authentic Learning Environments for Writing-Intensive Nursing Courses.

Undergraduate students often perceive a disconnect between research and nursing practice. To support student understanding of this relationship, an innovative, authentic learning environment was created in a writing-intensive, capstone-level nursing course. Authentic learning environments couple real-life situations/simulations with personal, experiential learner engagement. Students completed pre- and postsurveys assessing their beliefs about and confidence in using research to inform practice. Quantitative and open-ended qualitative responses were analyzed with inferential statistics and conventional content analysis techniques, respectively. Findings suggested the learning environment increased student confidence and facilitated connections between research and practice, supporting continued use and further evaluation of this approach.