Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Adv Nurs ; 76(10): 2586-2596, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32748979

RESUMO

AIM: To describe the nature of readmission to acute care and identify patient characteristics associated with avoidable readmission to acute care from inpatient brain injury rehabilitation. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort design. METHODS: Data prospectively documented between 1 January 2012 -31 December 2018 in local clinical and administrative database were used. Patient medical records were accessed when missing data were identified. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the nature of readmission episodes and univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify patient characteristics associated with readmission to acute care. RESULTS: Of the 383 patients admitted for rehabilitation, 83 (22%) experienced readmission to acute care for a total of 171 episodes. Thirty-seven percent of readmission episodes were due to hospital acquired complications and therefore potentially avoidable. Infection accounted for 63% of hospital acquired complications. Patients with an avoidable readmission episode (N = 38) were more likely to have a significantly lower Functional Independence Measure score, be incontinent, have a tracheostomy, require a mobility aid, and be prescribed a dysphagia diet on rehabilitation admission. Patients with a tracheostomy on rehabilitation admission had a 56% probability for an avoidable readmission to acute care. CONCLUSION: Brain injury rehabilitation patients with an avoidable readmission to acute care were more likely to have a higher burden of care on rehabilitation admission and infection was the leading cause of avoidable readmission episodes. IMPACT: Research into readmission to acute care in the mixed brain injury inpatient rehabilitation population is limited. In this patient population, readmission to acute care is a contemporary issue that can occur at any time during a patient's rehabilitation admission. This study provides valuable information informing practice change for preventing avoidable readmission episodes. Locally developed policy aimed at preventing readmission episodes should include proactive prevention, early recognition of complications and discrete escalation care pathways.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas , Pacientes Internados , Hospitalização , Humanos , Readmissão do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
J Clin Nurs ; 29(3-4): 593-601, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31769573

RESUMO

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To identify the predictors of unplanned readmission to acute care (RTAC) from inpatient brain injury rehabilitation and to develop a risk prediction model. BACKGROUND: RTAC from inpatient rehabilitation is not uncommon. Individual rehabilitation patient populations require their own body of evidence regarding predictors of RTAC. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Adult patients with new onset acquired brain injury admitted to a stand-alone rehabilitation facility between 1 January 2012-31 December 2018 were included in the study. The main measures were RTAC, sensitivity, specificity, the C-statistic and Youden's index. This paper is reported using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. RESULTS: Of 383 patients admitted for rehabilitation, 83 (22%) experienced a RTAC; 69 (18%) patients had at least one unplanned RTAC episode. Patients requiring unplanned RTAC were more likely to have lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores on rehabilitation admission, a higher burden of care on rehabilitation discharge and be discharged to a nonhome residence. Rehabilitation admission GCS and motor FIM were identified as the independent RTAC predictors in multivariate regression modelling. The combined C-statistic was 0.86. A GCS cut-off score of ≤14 and motor FIM cut-off score of ≤40 were identified as optimal, yielding a combined Youden's index of 0.56 (sensitivity = 0.72; specificity = 0.83). CONCLUSION: Patients requiring an unplanned RTAC had a lower functional status on rehabilitation admission. A prediction model for unplanned RTAC has been developed using validated and readily available clinical measures. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The developed RTAC risk prediction model is the first step in preventing unplanned RTAC from inpatient brain injury rehabilitation. Future research should focus on discrete interventions for preventing unplanned RTAC from inpatient brain injury rehabilitation.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/reabilitação , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Idoso , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Feminino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
3.
PM R ; 11(12): 1335-1345, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31041836

RESUMO

Readmission to acute care (RTAC) from inpatient rehabilitation can have negative consequences for individuals and associated financial costs are increasing. Consequently, preventing avoidable RTAC represents a target for improvement in quality of care. The aim of this integrative review was to identify predictors of RTAC from inpatient rehabilitation. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ProQuest, and CINAHL databases was used. Thematic analysis was used to examine extracted data. Strong evidence indicating that the principal predictors of RTAC are lower functional status on admission to rehabilitation, a more severe injury and a higher number of comorbidities was identified in this review. This is despite the heterogeneous nature of impairment groups and factors/measures examined. However, the relevance of some predictors of RTAC (such as patient demographics, invasive devices and primary diagnoses) may be dependent on rehabilitation setting, impairment group or time between rehabilitation admission and RTAC (eg, below 3 vs 30 days). Consequently, findings of this integrative review highlight that RTAC is a complex, multifactorial patient issue with a complex interplay between the predictors and reasons for RTAC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Reabilitação , Humanos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...