Improving the ability of mental health nurses to give second opinion in Judicial Reviews: an evaluation study.

In New Zealand, concern has been expressed regarding the variable quality of second opinions given by health professionals assisting judicial decisions on the use of compulsory assessment and treatment under mental health legislation. This second opinion is mostly given by registered mental health nurses. An innovative education programme based on experiential learning and adult learning principles was developed to assist health professionals to effectively undertake this role. A mixed method pre-post test intervention research design was developed to evaluate the effectiveness of the programme in assisting health professionals to feel more competent in undertaking the role. Data from the participants (n= 112) was subjected to descriptive statistical analysis and a thematic analysis of open-ended questions. The findings suggested gains in all competencies following the education programme, although there was room for further improvement. These changes were sustained over time at the next occasion when the health professionals undertook the role. There is a need to nationally disseminate such educational innovations to assist more mental health nurses to maximize their input into judicial decisions, which have a marked impact on the lives of those service users involved.

What is the role of procedural justice in civil commitment?

OBJECTIVE: To determine best practice management strategies in the clinical application of civil commitment. METHOD: All relevant literature on the topics of 'civil commitment', 'coercion' and 'procedural justice' were located on MEDLINE and PsychLIT databases and reviewed. Literature on the use of Ulysses contracts and advance directives in mental health treatment was integrated into the findings. RESULTS: Best practice evidence that guides management strategies is limited to the time of enactment of civil commitment. Management strategies involve enhancing the principles of procedural justice as a means of limiting negative patient perception of commitment. In the absence of evidence-based research beyond this point of enactment, grounds for the application of the principles of procedural justice are supported by reference to ethical considerations. Ulysses contracts provide an additional method for strengthening procedural justice. CONCLUSIONS: Procedural justice principles should be routinely applied throughout the processes of civil commitment in order to enhance longer term therapeutic outcomes and to blunt paternalism.