Early outcomes of kidney transplant recipients from donors with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A report of 5 cases.

BACKGROUND: Transplanting kidneys from donors with a recent history of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is uncommon due to concerns about the risk of viral transmission and the quality of kidneys from these donors. To date, there are no conclusive data on viral transmission from extrapulmonary solid organ transplants. Given the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in potential donors, shortage of kidneys available for transplantation, and low risk of viral transmission, we developed a clinical protocol for accepting kidneys from donors with recent severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who demonstrate preserved kidney function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected data on early outcomes of 5 kidney transplant recipients from 4 deceased donors hospitalized for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Donor creatinine ranged from 0.51 to 0.60 mg/dL and kidney donor profile index (KDPI) from 14 to 52%. Three of the five kidneys were from donation after circulatory death. All recipients were fully vaccinated, and 4/5 received post-exposure prophylactic monoclonal antibody treatment. While 3 recipients had delayed graft function, all had excellent graft function at 3 or 4 weeks post-operatively. None of the recipients displayed signs or symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection post-transplant. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that kidney grafts from donors with a recent history of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection but with preserved kidney function can be safely used and have good early outcomes.

New ERAS in liver transplantation - Past, present, and next steps.

There are parallels between the history of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) and liver transplantation. Both have been established and advanced by innovative individuals, often going against perceived wisdom and convention. Liver transplantation has traditionally been considered too complex for ERAS pathways, despite a small number of trials showing them to be both safe and of benefit. To date, there are very few randomized controlled trials and cohort studies publishing outcomes on liver transplant patients enrolled in comprehensive ERAS pathways. To progress our field, the 2022 International Liver Transplantation Society's Consensus Conference has created expert panels to analyze the evidence in 32 domains of the liver transplantation pathway using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach to generate expert recommendations. These recommendations will be voted on by the international community to gain consensus using the Danish model, and create the ERAS4OLT.org Enhanced Recovery after Liver Transplantation Pathway.

Technological Advancements in Uterus Transplantation.

Uterus transplantation is barely a decade old and in a young, evolving field it is hard to identify "technological advances" since it is, in of itself, a technological advance. Nonetheless, one can still identify advances in diagnostic imaging that have improved donor screening to avoid graft losses, highlight the adoption of robotic surgery to make the living donor uterus procurement more minimally invasive, and look to a future of biotechnology like perfusion pumps and bioengineering such as synthetic uterus to increase donor supply. Additional technologies are on the horizon and promise to shape the field further.

Robotic Donor Hysterectomy Results in Technical Success and Live Births After Uterus Transplantation: Subanalysis Within the Dallas Uterus Transplant Study (DUETS) Clinical Trial.

Minimally invasive procurement of uterine grafts for transplantation can decrease living donor recovery time. We examined recipient outcomes for grafts procured by robotic-assisted donor hysterectomies with transvaginal extraction in the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study (DUETS). All 5 grafts were successfully transplanted. Recipients had a median 4.5-hour surgical time, 0.25 L estimated blood loss, and 4-day hospital stay. Four recipients had grade III surgical complications and three had acute cellular rejection. At 18 months, graft viability was 100%, with an 80% live birth rate. This report demonstrates the feasibility and reproducible success of using uterus grafts from living donors who underwent robotic-assisted donor hysterectomy.

The Evolution of Transplantation From Saving Lives to Fertility Treatment: DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study).

OBJECTIVE: We report the results of the first 20 uterus transplants performed in our institution. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Uterus transplantation (UTx) aims at giving women affected by absolute uterine-factor infertility the possibility of carrying their own pregnancy. UTx has evolved from experimental to an established surgical procedure. METHODS: The Dallas Uterus Transplant Study (DUETS) program started in 2016. The uterus was transplanted in orthotopic position with vascular anastomoses to the external iliac vessels and removed when 1 or 2 live births were achieved. Immunosuppression lasted only for the duration of the uterus graft. RESULTS: Twenty women, median age 29.7 years, enrolled in the study, with 10 in phase 1 and 10 in phase 2. All but 2 recipients had a congenital absence of the uterus. Eighteen recipients received uteri from living donors and 2 from deceased donors. In phase 1, 50% of recipients had a technically successful uterus transplant, compared to 90% in phase 2. Four recipients with a technical success in phase 1 have delivered 1 or 2 babies, and the fifth recipient with a technical success is >30 weeks pregnant. In phase 2, 2 recipients have delivered healthy babies and 5 are pregnant. CONCLUSIONS: UTx is a unique type of transplant; whose only true success is a healthy child birth. Based on results presented here, involving refinement of the surgical technique and donor selection process, UTx is now an established solution for absolute uterine-factor infertility.

DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): Complete report of 6-month and initial 2-year outcomes following open donor hysterectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Uterus transplantation has shown success in treating women with uterine factor infertility who want to carry their own pregnancy. METHODS: We report the medical, sexual, and psychological outcomes of our first cohort of 13 living donor hysterectomies. As we have transitioned from open to robotically assisted hysterectomy, this report represents the complete series of open donor hysterectomies at our center, all with ≥6-month postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: The open donor hysterectomy had a median of a 6.5-hour surgical time, 0.8 L estimated blood loss, 6-day hospital stay, and 28-day sick leave. Three donors had a grade III or IV complications, one reported new-onset psychological symptoms, and 9 experienced transient sexual discomfort. All complications were addressed and resolved, and all donors returned to their presurgical social and physical activities. CONCLUSION: Since uterus transplantation is not life-saving or life-extending, the risks in living uterus donation must be weighed against the benefit of giving another woman the opportunity to give birth to her own child. This report provides data to support more detailed informed consent regarding the medical, psychological, and sexual complications of open living donor hysterectomy and allows for further evaluation of the ethical acceptability of this procedure.

Eversion Bile Duct Anastomosis: A Safe Alternative for Bile Duct Size Discrepancy in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation.

Bile duct size discrepancy in liver transplantation may increase the risk of biliary complications (BCs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and outcomes of the eversion bile duct anastomosis technique in deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) with duct-to-duct anastomosis. A total of 210 patients who received a DDLT with duct-to-duct anastomosis from 2012 to 2017 were divided into 2 groups: those who had eversion bile duct anastomosis (n = 70) and those who had standard bile duct anastomosis (n = 140). BC rates were compared between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of biliary strictures (P = 0.20) and leaks (P = 0.17) between the 2 groups. The BC rate in the eversion group was 14.3% and 11.4% in the standard anastomosis group. All the BCs in the eversion group were managed with endoscopic stenting. A severe size mismatch (≥3:1 ratio) was associated with a significantly higher incidence of biliary strictures (44.4%) compared with a 2:1 ratio (8.2%; P = 0.002). In conclusion, the use of the eversion technique is a safe alternative for bile duct discrepancy in DDLT. However, severe bile duct size mismatch may be a risk factor for biliary strictures with such a technique.

Recipient characteristics and morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Over the last decade, liver transplantation of sicker, older non-hepatitis C cirrhotics with multiple co-morbidities has increased in the United States. We sought to identify an easily applicable set of recipient factors among HCV negative adult transplant recipients associated with significant morbidity and mortality within five years after liver transplantation. METHODS: We collected national (n = 31,829, 2002-2015) and center-specific data. Coefficients of relevant recipient factors were converted to weighted points and scaled from 0-5. Recipient factors associated with graft failure included: ventilator support (five patients; hazard ratio [HR] 1.59; 95% CI 1.48-1.72); recipient age >60 years (three patients; HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.23-1.36); hemodialysis (three patients; HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.16-1.37); diabetes (two patients; HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.14-1.27); or serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dl without hemodialysis (two patients; HR 1.15; 95% CI 1.09-1.22). RESULTS: Graft survival within five years based on points (any combination) was 77.2% (0-4), 69.1% (5-8) and 57.9% (>8). In recipients with >8 points, graft survival was 42% (model for end-stage liver disease [MELD] score <25) and 50% (MELD score 25-35) in recipients receiving grafts from donors with a donor risk index >1.7. In center-specific data within the first year, subjects with ≥5 points (vs. 0-4) had longer hospitalization (11 vs. 8 days, p <0.01), higher admissions for rehabilitation (12.3% vs. 2.7%, p <0.01), and higher incidence of cardiac disease (14.2% vs. 5.3%, p <0.01) and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (78.6% vs. 39.5%, p = 0.03) within five years. CONCLUSION: The impact of co-morbidities in an MELD-based organ allocation system need to be reassessed. The proposed clinical tool may be helpful for center-specific assessment of risk of graft failure in non-HCV patients and for discussion regarding relevant morbidity in selected subsets. LAY SUMMARY: Over the last decade, liver transplantation of sicker, older patient with multiple co-morbidities has increased. In this study, we show that a set of recipient factors (recipient age >60 years, ventilator status, diabetes, hemodialysis and creatinine >1.5 mg/dl) can help identify patients that may not do well after transplant. Transplanting sicker organs in patients with certain combinations of these characteristics leads to lower survival.

Living uterus donation and transplantation: experience of interest and screening in a single center in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about attitudes toward uterus donation and transplantation in society and the interest of the women the treatment is aimed to assist. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the interest of recipients and living donors in our uterus transplantation program; it describes the screening protocol we developed and the results of the screening and reports demographic data and characteristics of screened candidates. STUDY DESIGN: Initial screening and evaluation included physical examinations by a gynecologist and a transplant surgeon; psychological evaluation; imaging (x-ray, computed tomography, ultrasound); blood tests; immunological testing; viral, bacterial, and fungal testing; drug screen; hormonal testing; Papanicolau smear; urinalysis; and electrocardiogram. For selected recipients, the process also included in vitro fertilization. RESULTS: A total of 351 women contacted our department with interest in participating in uterus transplantation; 272 were potential recipients and 79 were potential donors. Among these women, 179 potential recipients and 62 potential donors continued the evaluation after the initial telephone screening. The mean age of the donor candidates was 40 years; all had completed their own family, and 80% were nondirected. Most recipient candidates (92%) had an anatomical lack of the uterus, and of these, 36% had a congenital malformation. The women with a congenital uterine absence were in general younger than the women in the group whose uterus had been removed (mean of 28 and 33 years, respectively). In every step of the initial screening and evaluation process, there were donor and recipient candidates that chose not to continue the process. The reasons for self-withdrawal after expressing interest were not returning phone calls or e-mails (17 donors and 76 recipients); after initial phone screening, no longer interested (1 donor and 9 recipients); in step 1, health history questionnaire not returned after 1 reminder (10 donors and 9 recipients); step 2, not right in their current life situation (2 donors and 2 recipients), and in step 3, chose another way to achieve motherhood (1 recipient). Most donor and recipient candidates (52% and 78%, respectively) could be screened out (because of self-withdrawal or transplant team's decision) during the noninvasive and cost-efficient initial screening. CONCLUSION: Our initial experience shows a great interest in participating in a trial of uterus transplantation by both potential recipients and donors. It is the first study to show interest in nondirected donation. A sufficient but thoughtful screening process of living donors and recipients is essential and should aim both to assure donor/recipient safety and to provide good quality grafts.

Tumor biology and pre-transplant locoregional treatments determine outcomes in patients with T3 hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis. This study was conducted to determine the impact of pre-transplant locoregional therapy (LRT) on HCC and our institution's experience with expansion to United Network of Organ Sharing Region 4 T3 (R4T3) criteria. Two hundred and twenty-five patients with HCC (176 meeting Milan and 49 meeting R4T3 criteria) underwent liver transplantation from 2002 to 2008. Compared with the Milan criteria, HCCs in R4T3 criteria displayed less favorable biological features such as higher median alpha-fetoprotein level (21.9 vs. 8.5 ng/mL, p = 0.01), larger tumor size, larger tumor number, and higher incidence of microvascular invasion (22% vs. 5%, p = 0.002). As a result, patients meeting Milan criteria had better five-yr survival (79% vs. 69%, p = 0.03) and a trend toward lower HCC recurrence rates (5% vs. 13%, p = 0.05). Pre-transplant LRT did not affect post-transplant outcomes in patients meeting Milan criteria but did result in lower three-yr HCC recurrence (7% vs. 75%, p < 0.001) and better three-yr survival (p = 0.02) in patients meeting R4T3 criteria. Tumor biology and pre-transplant LRT are important factors that determine the post-transplant outcomes in patients with HCC who meet R4T3 criteria.

Sirolimus and cardiovascular disease risk in liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Two adverse effects of sirolimus are hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia. These elevated levels often lead clinicians to discontinue the sirolimus from concerns of an increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; however, evidence suggests that sirolimus might be cardioprotective. There are no published reports of sirolimus CVD in liver transplantation. METHODS: We reviewed all 1812 liver recipients who underwent transplantation from 1998 to 2010, identifying a cohort using sirolimus as part of the initial immunosuppression (SRL Cohort) and a control group of the remaining patients from this period where SRL was never given (Non-SRL Control). A prospectively maintained database identified all episodes of myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and cerebrovascular accident and tracked triglyceride, high-density and low-density lipoproteins, and total cholesterol levels. A Framingham Risk Model calculated the predicted 10-year risk of CVD for both groups. RESULTS: The SRL Cohort (n=406) is older, more predominantly male, with more pretransplantation hypertension and diabetes and posttransplantation hypertension compared to Non-SRL Controls (n=1005). The SRL Cohort has significantly higher triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein, and cholesterol levels at 6 months and 1 year. There is no difference in MI incidence in the SRL Cohort (1.0% vs. 1.2%) and no difference in AAA, cerebrovascular accident, and CHF. The Framingham Risk Model predicts that the SRL Cohort should have almost double the 10-year risk of CVD compared to the Non-SRL Control (11% vs. 6%). CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus causes hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia, but it does not increase the incidence of MI or other CVDs. Considering the SRL Cohort has more cardiac risk factors and nearly double 10-year predicted CVD risk, the fact that the CVD incidence is similar suggests that sirolimus is in fact cardioprotective.

Implications of a positive crossmatch in liver transplantation: a 20-year review.

Whether a positive crossmatch result has any relevance to liver transplantation (LT) outcomes remains controversial. We assessed the impact of a positive crossmatch result on patient and graft survival and posttransplant complications. During a 20-year period, 2723 LT procedures with crossmatch results were identified: 2479 primary transplants and 244 retransplants. The rates of positive B cell and T cell crossmatches were 10.1% and 7.4%, respectively, for primary transplants and 14.6% and 6.4%, respectively, for retransplants (P = 0.049 for a B cell crossmatch). Across all primary transplants, females (P < 0.001) and patients with autoimmune hepatitis (P < 0.001) had greater frequencies of positive crossmatches. There was no effect from race or age. For both primary transplants and retransplants, patient survival and graft survival were not affected by the presence of a positive crossmatch. With respect to posttransplant complications, there were no differences in rejection episodes (hyperacute, acute, or chronic) or technical complications (biliary and vascular) between negative and positive crossmatch groups. However, there were significant differences in the pathological findings of preservation injury (PI) on liver biopsy samples taken at the time of transplantation and within the first week of transplantation (P = 0.003 for B cells and P = 0.03 for T cells). In summary, a positive crossmatch had no significant impact on patient survival or graft outcomes. However, there was a significantly higher incidence of PI in primary LT recipients with a positive crossmatch. This finding is important for a broader understanding of PI, which may include a significant immunological component.

Renal-sparing immunosuppressive protocol using OKT3 after liver transplantation: a 19-year single-institution experience.

Different renal-sparing immunosuppressive protocols have been used in liver transplantation. At our institution, muromonab-CD3 (OKT3) is used in patients with acute renal failure (ARF), along with a delay in starting a calcineurin inhibitor. This study was conducted to compare outcomes in liver transplant patients with ARF who received OKT3 and those who did not. From 1988 to 2007, ARF was present in 1685 of 2587 patients (65%). OKT3 was used in 109 patients (OKT3 group). The control group (1416 patients) received a low-dose calcineurin inhibitor. The OKT3 group was more critically ill. In spite of this, the OKT3 group patients who were on renal replacement therapy (RRT) achieved long-term survival similar to that of the control group on RRT. Among the patients who were not on RRT, the OKT3 group had a higher complete recovery rate, but this did not translate into improved long-term survival. Bacterial and fungal infections were more common in the OKT3 group; however, there was no increased risk of malignancy or death from hepatitis C recurrence. The use of OKT3 in patients with ARF allowed more critically ill patients on RRT to achieve survival rates similar to those of patients who did not receive OKT3.

Effect of tacrolimus on survival in hepatitis C-infected patients after liver transplantation.

The observation that cyclosporine inhibits HCV replication in vitro has led some programs to use cyclosporine as the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) of choice after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Previous studies comparing outcomes with different CNIs used small HCV cohorts or had short-term follow-up. We examined patient survival and fibrosis progression in all HCV-infected adult primary OLT recipients from 1995 to 2004 at the Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute (n = 516). Patients were categorized by their CNI on day 7 post-OLT, and they were excluded if they died before day 14. Patient and donor age, sex, race, and prevalence of cytomegalovirus infection post-OLT were similar in the tacrolimus and cyclosporine patients. As expected, acute cellular rejection and steroid-resistant rejection were less common in tacrolimus-treated patients. Although no difference in 1-year survival was seen, tacrolimus patients (n = 268) had superior 5-year survival compared to cyclosporine patients (n = 248) (75% vs. 67%; P = 0.02). Fibrosis progression was no different between the groups. In our retrospective analysis of 516 post-OLT patients, tacrolimus improved long-term survival compared to cyclosporine in HCV-infected patients, although it did not impact HCV fibrosis progression.